Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Subservient Chicken
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 17:20, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable, viral marketing. Coq Roq is also listed on VfD. --WikiFan04Talk 3:02, 19 Aug 2005 (CDT)
- Keep; far more notable than "Coq Roq". --Golbez 08:07, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Coq Roq was advertised, Subservient Chicken wasn't. --WikiFan04
- Keep Subservient Chicken WAS advertised and is more well-known that Coq Roq (although also think Coq Roq should stay). -Wiffle0rz 09:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Golbez Tonywalton
| Talk 10:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC) - Keep Memorable little website, liked the article. CanadianCaesar 12:17, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Memorable, multiple news articles covered the initial release. -HX
- Strong Keep this was the first really successful viral advertising campaign, and brought nationwide attention to the marketing technique. Plus, the chicken looks sexy in those garters. --Outlander 14:12, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Trollderella 15:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep. -- JamesTeterenko 17:47, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. --Klander Brigade 15:28 19 August 2005 (EST)
- Definate keep Unlike Coq Roq, is amusing and makes for quite an interesting read. D-Katana
- Keep 05:36, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Widely noted and reported on. MCB 06:53, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep --Wulf 23:38, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, reported in media all the way to Finland. --Agamemnon2 14:21, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep have a heart you people. --Boycottthecaf 23:47, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Keep I just feel that it'd be probably a better idea to keep it and merge it with all the other examples of viral marketing. But that's me. --T-Boy 11:54, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
- KEEP another example of someone trying to get an article deleted just because they don't like it....--The_stuart 14:48, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Keep this site is changing the entire advertising industry. http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,63053,00.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.169.154.2 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 24 August 2005
- Keep This is valuable data as long as entered in NPOV, which seems to be the case. Lpm 19:46, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I know this isn't the Wayback machine, but the advertiser isn't going to keep the website there forever, and Wikipedia is one of those able to keep a record of something that is both relevant and entertaining. rastro
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.