Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lets be nice
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 03:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bringing this here for a procedural discussion. It was initially speedied under slightly dubious circumstances — a user tagged the band with a {{prod}}, re-added the prod after it was removed, and then tagged the album A7 (which doesn't apply to albums blah blah blah); an admin then deleted it in good faith on the grounds that the band was about to be deleted via prod. Bringing it here as a procedural nom to unravel the can of worms before it escalates; generally, albums by notable artists are automatically notable, but should it apply in a case like this where the artist is very borderline? (IMO they do pass WP:N, but on the grounds of one song which was on the "Scream" soundtrack.) Procedural nom, so I abstain. — iridescent 01:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- See, it never looked like that before the last time I saw it. Review the band which had a prod tag but, as was the case with this subject, saw me back and forth due to the removal of the templates. Dlae
│here 22:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Is it not better that it has been improved? I have also worked on the band's article a little, and intend to a little further. J Milburn (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, the article looks much better than when I originally nominated it for deletion. Nice work. Dlae
│here 11:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, the article looks much better than when I originally nominated it for deletion. Nice work. Dlae
- Is it not better that it has been improved? I have also worked on the band's article a little, and intend to a little further. J Milburn (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but maybe rename after the one successful song of the album. The article on the band itself is currently tagged for notability but not listed for deletion. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 01:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 06:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I have cleaned it up- references are hard to come by, as this was released pre-Internet-boom, but I still found a review on what claims to be the "oldest music review site on the net" (well, the link was already in the article...) and so I have cited the fact reviews were positive, and I have found citations for the appearances of the songs on other albums. Text has been cleaned up, I have categorised, added an infobox, etc. Notable album by a notable band, released by a notable label. J Milburn (talk) 13:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable album by a notable band on the largest independently owned record label in the US which had released the first Nine Inch Nails album Doc Strange (talk) 17:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep looks fine to me--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.