Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Teles
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdraw per @HawkAussie:'s request. (non-admin closure) FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- David Teles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
He hasn't played in a WP:FPL based league which would make him fail WP:NFOOTY. HawkAussie (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment according to his career page he seems to actually have played, albeit not much. He also seems to have been loaned out now to Condeixa. Geschichte (talk) 06:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - has played in the FPL LigaPro per this; young player with ongoing career, we keep. GiantSnowman 08:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - I can only echo what has been said above, career still ongoing after NFOOTY pass - which is consensus to keep. Teles is currently with Condeixa in the Campeonato de Portugal - per the Portuguese FA. R96Skinner (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- To me, the fact that this young man meets NFOOTY suggests that NFOOTY is overly inclusionist. We certainly can't write a well-sourced biography of him!—S Marshall T/C 10:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but an AfD isn't the place to discuss whether current guidelines are correct or incorrect; as mentioned recently at AfD/Atantaake Tooma. R96Skinner (talk) 10:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Withdraw Can someone withdraw this one for now. HawkAussie (talk) 00:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Done and done. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.