Talk:Floating charge

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Re-write

Did a bit of a re-write on this article. Apologies if I have trampled on anyone's toes, but this article looked like it needed love, and hadn't had any in a long time. Legis 13:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aus & NZ

I was reading Getzler & Payne, Company Charges - Spectrum and Beyond (ISBN 0-19-929993-5) and in the foreword Lord Millett claims that the floating charge has been abolished in Australia and New Zealand. Is that correct? --Legis (talk - contributions) 16:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Floating charge

Re-write

Aus & NZ

Navigation menu

Search