Talk:Cision Inc.
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cision Inc. redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose that Cision Inc. be merged into Cision. Confusingly, the two articles contain a hat note which indicate that the two entities should not be confused but I believe they are the same company. The first is older than the second; I have no strong opinions on which should be merged into which but I believe we generally do not include "INC." In the title which is why I proposed the order that I listed. See also Talk:Cision#Merger_proposal.--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Article does not make clear the distinction between Cision and Cision Inc. Andrew327 11:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed. Given the significant amounts of overlap (the infoboxes for example effectively cover the same entities), I see no reason that the company should be covered in separate "pre-merger" and "post-merger" articles. Meets WP:OVERLAP. Guliolopez (talk) 09:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)