User contributions for 51.7.229.212

29 June 2020

• 17:5117:51, 29 June 2020 diff hist +634‎ User talk:51.7.229.212 No edit summary
• 16:0816:08, 29 June 2020 diff hist +123‎ User talk:51.7.229.212 No edit summary
• 16:0316:03, 29 June 2020 diff hist +2,370‎ User talk:51.7.229.212 what I was about to post on the article talk page
• 15:5315:53, 29 June 2020 diff hist +944‎ User talk:51.7.229.212 No edit summary
• 15:3015:30, 29 June 2020 diff hist −577‎ User talk:51.7.229.212 ←Blanked the page Tag: Blanking
• 15:3015:30, 29 June 2020 diff hist −1,757‎ Zaryadye Park Undid revision 965125199 by Favonian (talk) you obviously didn't bother to read either my earlier edit summary ("Significant editing was necessary. This was full of bad grammar and text that was a huge distance away from neutral and encyclopaedic") or what you put back (e.g. "Another advantage of the new park is a picturesque view...") Tag: Undo
• 12:5612:56, 29 June 2020 diff hist −30‎ List of Roman triumphal arches Undid revision 965059026 by Cote d'Azur (talk) you appear to have spectacularly misunderstood the manual of style Tag: Undo
• 12:5412:54, 29 June 2020 diff hist −1,757‎ Zaryadye Park Undid revision 965081445 by Cote d'Azur (talk) Tag: Undo
• 11:3511:35, 29 June 2020 diff hist −379‎ List of largest optical refracting telescopes Rewrote lead. Some of it was simply incomprehensible. Possibly vandalism, possibly severe English-language incompetence. Use of wrong decimal separator sadly supports latter view.
• 11:2511:25, 29 June 2020 diff hist 0‎ Calf Top Oops, too high. Previous fixed the poor style of starting the article with a falsehood
• 11:2411:24, 29 June 2020 diff hist +35‎ Calf Top No edit summary
• 11:1911:19, 29 June 2020 diff hist −17‎ Calf Top Uselessly vague
• 11:1811:18, 29 June 2020 diff hist −631‎ Calf Top Wikipedia is not a guide book

28 June 2020

• 21:2621:26, 28 June 2020 diff hist −4‎ Thomas Bopp →Early life and education
• 21:2521:25, 28 June 2020 diff hist −8‎ Thomas Bopp style fixing, particularly lazy use of contractions, and ludicrous misuse of the word "admitted"
• 21:2021:20, 28 June 2020 diff hist −294‎ North America Nebula a minor typographical difference that might sometimes be seen is not worth commenting on Tag: references removed
• 21:2021:20, 28 June 2020 diff hist −338‎ North America Nebula →Image gallery: none of these seem to add anything, some are merely amateur astronomer spam Tag: section blanking
• 21:1921:19, 28 June 2020 diff hist −75‎ North America Nebula →General information: style fixing, improved writing, removed spam text
• 21:1721:17, 28 June 2020 diff hist −83‎ North America Nebula style fixing
• 21:1621:16, 28 June 2020 diff hist −1,760‎ Lagoon Nebula →Gallery: 15 images:3 paragraphs of text is an absurd ratio. Reduced to 1:1 which is still excessive. Tag: references removed
• 21:1421:14, 28 June 2020 diff hist −675‎ NGC 281 removed image spamming by amateur astronomers, fixed grammar errors
• 21:1121:11, 28 June 2020 diff hist −526‎ Rosette Nebula →Image gallery: Ten images is a ludicrous excess for such a short article. Cut to three.
• 21:1021:10, 28 June 2020 diff hist −438‎ Rosette Nebula →Observing the Rosette Nebula: WP:NOT an instruction manual Tag: section blanking
• 21:0921:09, 28 June 2020 diff hist −191‎ Rosette Nebula Removed spam and style errors
• 21:0621:06, 28 June 2020 diff hist −144‎ North America Nebula Undid revision 953108744 by Aweinstein19 (talk) removed spam promo Tag: Undo
• 21:0321:03, 28 June 2020 diff hist −3‎ 2019 Reed Bank incident Undid revision 964914747 by Kguirnela (talk) it is not. It does not exist outside specialised maritime legal contexts, and Wikipedia is not a specialised maritime legal document. Tag: Undo
• 21:0021:00, 28 June 2020 diff hist −7‎ Taoiseach →Residence: There is no apparent reason to use a phrase in quotes.
• 20:5920:59, 28 June 2020 diff hist −8‎ Taoiseach →Overview: There is no need for these words to be in italics
• 20:5920:59, 28 June 2020 diff hist −2‎ Taoiseach 2 clauses is better than 3
• 20:5720:57, 28 June 2020 diff hist +22‎ Taoiseach "his/her" is an awful formulation. English provides us with a pronoun, "their", which satisfies the required meaning. Additionally, the Taoiseach does not have to be male, so "he" to refer to a generic Taoiseach is not correct.
• 20:5120:51, 28 June 2020 diff hist −58‎ List of Roman triumphal arches A first sentence which does nothing more than tell you what the title of the article is, is useless. Rewrote in accordance with the manual of style
• 20:4920:49, 28 June 2020 diff hist −1,757‎ Zaryadye Park Significant editing was necessary. This was full of bad grammar and text that was a huge distance away from neutral and encyclopaedic.