User talk:Khoikhoi/Archived

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chaldean (talk | contribs) at 03:54, 29 September 2006 (→‎[[User:Loganos]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Khoikhoi is currently busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15.

Mother Teresa

I have no idea about Latinus... As for Mother Teresa, what i know is that her father was of Aromanian origins. but i am not sure about her mother's origins... Going for the 16th archive, right?:) Hectorian 01:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your response. By the way, I do not like those unsourced edits there and elsewhere intended to present the speakers of minority languages in Turkey less than they actually are. But I do not like its exact opposite either. Atilim Gunes Baydin 09:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Khoi
The Goals of this WP are attentioned in it and so you can read here:
Goals
WikiProject Ossetia was created to help those interested in improving all of the Ossetian-related articles on Wikipedia to find a particular area in which they are interested in working. Our goals are as following:
  • Present a realistic view of Ossetia and the Ossetian people in the world.
  • Make Wikipedia a primary and reliable source of Ossetia related information.
  • To improve the quality and quantity of Ossetia related articles, including improving Ossetia to featured article status.
If you saw any part of this Goals are mentioned:
Goals
WikiProject Ossetia was created to POV User:Zandweb's Idea ...
then you can say it is POV.
If you think any of those mentioned Goals are POV you are free to moderate it, but before that I suggest you to read at least two more WPs and their Goals.
If you want to create any WP yu can read [1]. Fortunately I will not remove all stubs related to its articles like this: [2] / [3] / [4], and I will not stimulate or persuade someone to do like these: [5] / [6]. Because these are exactly POV and POV organize according to chauvinism and bigotry.

ZANDWEBT

Barzanî

Hi, I am not so firm on the name politics at en: I'd say: just try and look if someone complains :) --Erdal Ronahi 10:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Valencian Community and Galicia

(in English/en inglés)
Please, you must move give the articles "Galicia (Iberian peninsula)" and "Valencia (autonomous community)" to "Galicia (Spain)" and "Valencian Community", because it's more suitable. I cannot do it. Thank you.


(en español/in Spanish)
Por favor, usted debe trasladar los artículos "Galicia (Iberian peninsula)" y "Valencia (autonomous community)" a "Galicia (Spain)" y "Valencian Community", porque es más adecuado. Yo no puedo hacerlo. Gracias. Satesclop 18:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

In the Valencian case, "Comunitat Valenciana" is translated to English as "Land of Valencia" according to the Regional Government, as it's used, i.e., in official tourism information. Cheers. --Joanot Martorell 20:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Joanot has invented it. The translation of his official name is "Valencian Community". He is a Valencian separatist, and has forged the reality. See the web of the Generalitat Valenciana: [7]

Jemten and Celikokte

Hey,I'm really not them, if you would like to check you can do it of course. There are thousands of users here in wikipedia, naturally someone may think like me about Roma people, sincerely- Zaparojdik 22:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Please see this edit [8] which was made without any prior discussion. I have raised it on the article's Talk page, but I can't revert anymore or I will be in 3RR trouble. What to do? Need advice. - Mauco 21:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Still some issues, but not as blatantly POV as before. I found out, luckily, that I was not the only editor on that article with common sense... - Mauco 15:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

The thread which you started in Talk:Transnistria has had several entries since then. Please give us your opinion on the last few. See Talk:Transnistria#Referendum_section and my proposed version as a result of this reasoning[9] - Mauco 04:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Article

did you have any time to look at the articles that I have sent you?neurobio 00:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Sinan

Script and transliteration is done over at Sinan. In the meantime, over at the test version for an Ottoman Turkish Wikipedia, I've got myself involved in the very first edit war over there. Yee-haw. —Saposcat 04:18, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Names and spelling

Hi, look how they are doing it with Russian names: Tchaikowsky. The English is the title, but cyrillic and transliteration are mentioned in the article. That's logical, since it's the English WP. --Erdal Ronahi 07:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok then, thanks for asking. See you. --Erdal Ronahi 12:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Roma people

Hey, of course there is no bad feelings about chencking user, I think that's one of your work on Wikipedia. Roma people's has no official population in records but Turkey just guess it by forse of first records of the republic and it's being 300.000 to 600.000 currently. They are mostly live in Thrace and large part of them migrated of way lawless to Turkey from Bulgaria after Bulgaria being an indepent state. Today they are really assimilated and they speak Turkish. I have never met with a Roma but I also don't think bad about them, I just think that It may be anti-Turkism to put Roma people page false and not current information. Sincelery- Zaparojdik 20:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Khoikhoi for adding 300.000- 2 million into the Roma people article, it's more right because it was look indubitable about their population in Turkey but not indubitable in Bulgaria, thanks again. -Zaparojdik 22:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully earlier this week with a result of (50/3/0). If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free to write me. I hope I will live up to your trust. Michael 19:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Hey Khoikhoi. Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate your support. By the way, the image on your user page is awesome! Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 20:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Page is suffering from neutrality issues. Care to assist? --Cat out 00:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

In Istanbul article, there is a link to the etymology of Istanbul in the first sentence. If those Greek city articles have an etymology section, the Turkish names can be removed. I am trying to be logical. If you can also at least try to be logical, it will be nice. Please, do not waste the time of the people ;-) Osmanaral 02:42, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

How many Turks live in Plovdiv? And, how many Greeks live in Istanbul? Could you give me these numbers with reference if you are trying to be logical? ;-) Even though the Greek population is very minor in Istanbul (less than 2000), you can find the Greek name of the city in etymology page. So, do not need to create a duplicate on the main [Istanbul] article. Osmanaral 04:35, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
In those Greek city articles, if they place the Turkish name for historical reasons in the history section or on an etymology page, that's fine. I would appreciate that. I am not saying that the Turkish name should be in the first sentence of the Greek city articles. We should not be upsetting our fellow Greek friends by doing that. agree? Osmanaral 04:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
ok. Could you tell me your reason for having the Greek name in the first sentence of Istanbul article even though it is in etymology page? Osmanaral 03:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
well, in this case the Greek name is not the historical name. The historical names of the city are Constantinople and Stamboul. And, Istanbul is derived from Stamboul. You know that, right? Osmanaral 03:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
This is English wikipedia, so it would be more appropriate to keep it in English. Osmanaral 03:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
I did. :) It doesn't make your case true. It is for the countries whose alphabet is in non-Latin. Take a look at it and try harder to make your case true ;) Osmanaral 04:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
haha..if you do not have an answer, you act like u didn't understand? Let me give you an example, the Chinese do not use the latin alphabet, the article name for their cities has to be in latin, but they can write the name in Chinese alphabet in the first line of the article. Osmanaral 04:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
playing the fool, huh? According to WP:UE, you can add the city's name in Greek alphabet in the first sentence of the Greek city articles. Of course, the article name will be in English - no one is saying the opposite (stop being funny). So, make some logic.. Osmanaral 04:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
I am giving you an example. It means that if the Greek language had been used in Turkey, it would be appropriate to add the name in Greek alphabet in the first sentence of the city article, and vice versa in Greece. This is the WP:UE guideline. Otherwise, you ll be adding the non-latin names of cities in many different languages in the first sentence. Osmanaral 05:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Those are your judgements which do not apply to WP:UE. Today, the Greek language is used by only a few thousand in Istanbul. Adding the Greek name in the first sentence of Istanbul article is only Chauvinism. You cannot explain it in any other way. I am not against our Greek sisters and brothers. I respect the Byzantium and the Ottoman history. So, the Greek name is very welcome in the etymology or history section. Yassas... Osmanaral 05:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

It's so silent here...

Hi, where have you disappeared? We miss you. --Ghirla -трёп- 12:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Spam advice

Thanks for the note--I will be more careful with my editing. For the record, I do not add commercial links. KonaScout 13:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

bonnie back?

I don't know how you manage to always nail him, but here you have a candidate: Cromwells Legacy (talk · contribs). `'mikka (t) 15:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The Halo's RfA

Syrians/Syria

I noticed that you took the correct view (that these are mostly used to refer to the country of Syria) at the beginning of the debate but then decided to change your mind to a dab page. I have NEVER heard the term Syrian/Syrians used to refer to Aramaic-speaking Christians, so it definitely doesn't warrant a dab page. Yuber(talk) 22:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes I am. I think Wiki is making a mockery of itself if it lets groups of determined nationalists make dab pages just because their ethnicity sounds similar to the name of a nationality. Yuber(talk) 21:51, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Cromwell Legacy

Who is Cromwell Legacy? Is Bonaparte, that legend of Wikipedia? I looked at his contributions, he is a new user who start contributing at articles not related with Romania/Moldova.

Regarding the edit he made in the Talk page of Transnistria, I believed it was a valid point: to name it "Moldovan region of Transnistria", in order not to confuse it with the entire region between rivers Dniester and Bug, which was also named Transnistria in WW2 (and which is a teritory ten times bigger). Sometimes such confusions appear, when old demographic data for the entire teritory between Dniester and Bug are compared with actual demographic data of Transnistria - the thin slice on the left of Dniester which belong to the Republic of Moldova.

Anyhow, the edit that was deleted was not vandalism, it was in a talk page (and this is why talk pages are). In my opinion, you overreacted by reverting it.--MariusM 23:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Abdul Hamid

No problem man, I found a few sites with references...I hope their alright. --Fedayee 22 September, 2006

Stalin

Gamarjobat. Thanks for the quote. You might like this one: - Comrade Zhukov, Khrushev says that you said word "pig" upon leaving my cabinet. Who did you mean? - Of course Hitler Comrade Stalin! - Right, I thought so. Comrade Khrushev who did you think Comrade Zhukov meant? Tamokk 04:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


Hey Mr Khoi

Hey Mr Khoi update your gallery with these Romanian pictures...tell me your opinion soon --Blaga 10:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Several editors have been fooling around with the Mount Ararat intro. I did a copy edit on what they did, but I'd appreciate if you would take a look. Hope your summer was nice! -- Ssilvers 15:51, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Theater

I know you're a smart guy, just compare the two photos:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:CJROtheatre.jpg or http://www.cs.ubbcluj.ro/~blaga/Cluj/Pictures/Big/theater.jpg

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4384315

:) It's the same building..--Blaga 18:02, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


You can upload them, just my 2 cents..--Blaga 18:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

This is a typical landscape from Romania, most probably from Transylvania

The secret?

LOL :) to be able to get this shot (20 min or so to play with exposures between 2,5 sec@f/8.0 and 15 sec@f/2.8) --Blaga 18:16, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Blaga=user:Bonaparte. Am I right in assuming this, Khoikhoi? Dahn 19:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Perfect. Also see User:Danutz, please. Dahn 19:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Are you sure? On the ro page, Danutz did not create himself a link to an English user's page, and it looks like the English Danutz came up with the idea of a "Romanian-speaking states" template that koko bonnie here keeps reverting to... Dahn 19:37, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

LOL:) --Blaga 19:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Template

Could you please do it? There is some weird kink in the template that does not allow me to view it on its own, and I'm sure you could bypass it quicker than I (and consequently list it for deletion). I am currently reviewing another article and my Internet connection has turned frustratingly slow, but do drop a note in case you decide to do this, so I can cast my vote. Many, many thanks. Dahn 00:27, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for teaching me how to fish :). That really was easy, after all. Discussion opened here: Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 September 24. Is there something I have to list with the template, and if so, could you do it? Dahn 01:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Btw, I need to ask someone: do your personal links ("my talk", "my preferences", "my watchlist" etc.) ever abruptly move from the right side of the screen to the left when you try to click them? (It happens to me quite often at certain intervals) Also, do you know who and where changes the general aspect of the entire wikipedia by underlining links willy-nilly? Please let me know, so that I may spam them with death threats for making my connection work like crap almost every time they get this bright idea... Dahn 01:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Perhaps I will. I first wanted to know if this sounds familiar (since you say it does not, I figure that the two incidents are, respectively, a bug and a stupid argument over aesthetics...). The main reason I asked was that such things were contributing to the difficulties I had earlier in editing pages (I have sinced logged out and in again, and they appear to be solved for now). Dahn 02:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Explorer... I know... Dahn 02:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
It's mainly because I have promised myself to have at least one flaw, so my perfection doesn't go to my head :). Dahn 03:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
(Come to think of it... if my perfection would go to my head... I would be flawed.) Dahn 03:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Revert

So I should revert my revert back to your version?Khosrow II 20:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up.Khosrow II 20:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Pontian Greek Genocide

Hi Khoikhoi. why are u keep adding the dispute tag? there has not been provided not even one single source to dispute it! have a look at the talk page... only rhetoric arguments. Hectorian 20:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

So, if it is so easy (and noone asks for sources and clear reasons to dispute an article), could i add 'dispute tags' for TRNC and Republic of Macedonia asking for them to be renamed? i could also provide sources, along with rhetorisms... Hectorian 21:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Ceyhan, Seyhan, Ceyhun, Seyhun

All four are different rivers Khoikhoi. Ceyhan River and Seyhan River are in Çukurova (I will shape up the Çukurova article). But Ceyhun and Seyhun are still different. In Turkish (as, I believe, in other Turkic languages), as briefly explained in the articles relating to those rivers, Ceyhun River is Amu Darya, and Seyhun River is Syr Darya, both of which are in Central Asia. Cretanforever

My 3RR

Thanks for the warning and I will certainly consider myself lucky. I've honestly never had this issue before which I why I haven't watched my steps as much as I should've. What really gets my goat is that I am always careful to state my case on Talk pages and argue the points, but the subject (Transnistria) is a bit controversial ... and, what's worse, the guy who kept ignoring our arguments and who wouldn't engage in serious discussion in the Talk page actually stated that he enjoys edit wars or else life gets too boring for him.[10] Sigh... - Mauco 05:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Three Revert Rule

The user Khosrow II violated the three revert rule in the article List_of_English_words_of_Turkic_origin. He reverted the article more than three times. I don't know where to complain. Would you please help me to solve this problem? Chapultepec 16:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Let the blocked user have his edit

I am not an admin, but I think you should immediately allow the edit to remain and then you should seek page protection until law enforcement gives an all clear or someone in authority at wikipedia decides otherwise. --Blue Tie 18:52, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Cookies

Chocolate is thought to relieve stress

Hi, Khoikhoi. I don't know if I've ever talked to you before but I saw the threatening e-mail you received on WP:ANI and I hope you're doing OK! I can't imagine how it felt to receive that e-mail. I hope the matter can be resolved and that you're not put off Wikipedia. Enjoy the cookies! :) Srose (talk) 19:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Yep, another article written by a Greek to tell the whole world how bad Turkey is, and how only Greeks ever suffer...

I have to say, i really am quite fed up of all this rubbish now. --A.Garnet 20:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment

And thanks for posting the email at WP:AN/I, more people needed to see what was happening. I wish I could be as detached about it as you are, but this thing is irritating the heck out of me. --Akhilleus (talk) 20:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

İzmir

Hi Khoikhoi. I notice you reverted my change to İzmir. My edit restored the original era usage to BC after the many instances of its use in the article had been systematically changed in violation of current Wikipedia policy (either BC or BCE is OK. The preference of the first major editor should be adhered to). I've put it back to using BC (but not AD) because this is how it was from the outset. I hope this is not too contentious. Cheers, Arcturus 21:36, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

I understand your point of view, but this article is about a place, not a religion. I think all - or most - of the articles about judaism and Islam don't use BC/AD. Personally I can't see a problem with BC, though I acknowledge some people might prefer an alternative to AD. I now tend to edit articles with just the year, e.g. 6 instead of AD 6, but for years before 1 the use of BC merely sets a marker with reference to a person who did exist, it makes no statement. Is the preference of the first editor set in stone? No, and if it was a religious article perhaps a change would be justified, but surely not in an article about about a place. Arcturus 22:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Late Reply

Hey thanks for the star :)) I will try more to improve everything. I just hope that I will be able to liberate more of my time from some disputes and try to contribute to other areas of interest (i am interested in other things than just conflicts or invasions :))..

On the other hand, I just came across to this issue of weird e-mails that some people have been receiving.. I hope that things are ok and will be ok.. I read the whole story, it was just plain weird for psychos to get worked up on such a small article (if it were a joke, it wasn't funny).. So how r u holding up? Baristarim 00:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Well I have been stressing a bit too, the usual.. friends, running around, work etc.. I am glad that you are taking it cool.. :) Well, my first full contribution to Wiki: [Constitution_of_Turkey]!! I completely rewrote the article.. It even looks better than [constitution of France]! I wish I could liberate more time from some disputes and concentrate on stuff like this.. I will try to add a history section to it when I have the time.. Take care! :) Baristarim 14:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Cretanpride

Not a problem. I understand why you did what you did: the threat was a scary one, and if I hadn't had so much experience with Cretanpride I might have taken it more seriously. As it is, knowing Cretanpride's history, I was fairly certain that "Emily" didn't exist; I still took the matter seriously enough to contact the police, but I didn't really think anyone was in jeopardy. (I think that on some level I also took comfort in the 48-hour deadline; if we had not had a result from the police by the time the deadline came close, and if we had received further notices saying "I'm serious! Change the article or she dies!", my attitude would probably have been different.

But there's no need for you to apologize. It was a stressful situation, and we were acting without guidance. I don't blame anyone for their response.—Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 02:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Cretan

Hi. The source concerning the changed edits is an english one, so i could read it. and it was not saying the things it was supposed to... thus, Miskin's edits are justifiable. Regards Hectorian 10:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Bonaparte

Should be taken care of now; let me know if something has been missed. Jayjg (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Forgive my recent excessive overtones, I never mean to create a hostile atmosphere but I can't help noticing that you have a constant prejudice against my edits. I have nothing against you and I know that supporting NPOV is always your priority. Miskin 16:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Friendly regards

Hey Khoikhoi,

I just saw the posts about the threatening e-mail you got, and just want to give my warmest regards. Unfortunately there happen to be some unpleasant personal attacks on Wikipedia. But this one is really is really distateful and offensive. I am glad to see that it didn't knock you out and that you still contribute in an honourable way. Geçmiş olsun as we say in Turkish. Bertilvidet 19:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Cretan Turks

I don't understand why it was moved.. What is the basis for it, even the Greek name in the title refer to it as such? Baristarim 20:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Urgent! I believe that Miskin and Tzekai are the same user [11] and [12].. What is the procudure? He has been requesting the same moves for ages. Your help would be appreciated.. Baristarim 21:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but after seeing your report to User:whatshisname I just cannot believe that you didn't want me to get blocked, nor that you sent me this last message out of pure desire for reconciliation. You accepted my apology after 12 hours or so, and if it weren't for a certain sequence of events you would have probably not replied to me at all. If you had wanted to find a mutually acceptable solution, you would have easily done so by suggesting it to me earlier in the day, letting me know that you're actively interested in the topic. Instead, you indirectly accused me to an administrator and most importantly, you didn't interfere once my block was put. The truth is that you were simply annoyed by my earlier overtones towards you, and that my apology was not enough to redeem it (as it was meant to). I can still co-operate with you in order to settle this debate, but don't expect me to reconcialiate as if nothing ever happened. Miskin 01:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks

Hi, Khoikhoi, and thanks for supporting me in my recent request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 70/4/4. I hope I can live up to your expectations, and if there's ever anything you need, you know where to find me! --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Want to give us your views? Hopefully this will end the most recent edit war and settle it for a while. - Mauco 05:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Please take a look on this page. The entries made by User:Timor Stultorum mix irrelevancy with inflammatory speech. Since Timor seems to like the arbitrary capitalization of words like "Mosque", since his English is of the same quality, and since his edits reproduce the exact same details as those pushed in the text by User:Vintila Barbu, I think we are dealing with a sockpuppet. You might also want to check out what he alleged on the talk page, to have an exact context for his poisonous POV. Dahn 11:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Question

Hello Khoikhoi. i uploaded an image [13], but i am not sure about its copyright status and which tag to use. the disclaimer of the site [14] puzzled me:/. i am not sure if u can help, but i would appreciate it if u could... Hectorian 17:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Things to be discussed

Dear Khoikhoi,

I am tired of edit/revert debates. I watch your transactions/edit since you sent me a welcome message. I respect your efforts for editing articles and looking for consensus.You are generally far away from fanatism. As you see, I am a new user in wikipedia.After first some my editing, I stopped to make something in wikipedia with a fear of to make big mistakes. But I continue watching some articles, some users to see and understand; what , Why and how they do.

Ok, Lets discuss somethings; 1-Samsun; You reverted my edit. And you add; "List of traditional Greek place names" again. Dear Khoikhoi, lets be serious. Is this an advertisement. There are many links there all of them reference to Greek places like as "Ancient Greek Cities in Anatolia", "Pontus" etc. which I never think about to delete them. But ,"List of traditional Greek place names" at the first line seems un suitable.Assume that; an user puts link to all Greek places related articles like as "List of traditional Turkish place names". Unsuitable. 2-You reverted some links in "Turkish Republic of Western Thrace". Please dont delete them.I know these links are empty now, but all of them are in my agenda.

Convention on naming Turkish-Greek places; There is a huge discussion. Some users offers logical solutions but many of others offers fanatic oppinions. I offered also to Barıstarım that; Lets establish a commission (not more than 7 people)with Equal number of Greek and Turkish users(can be voting among users).this commission delegate another neutral user as chairman/chief/reconciler . Commission make an agenda and puts the principles of naming(in title, in first line, and in the article),putting links,kategories etc. These rules and regulations are announced in a main template page and all related articles linked to that page as a guide. All further debates among users(especially newcomers) are solved by this commission.

I wish to take your oppinions firstly. Much regards and iyigeceler/kalinikta. Mustafa Akalp 18:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Samsun

Thanks a lot for consensus. Regards. Mustafa Akalp 20:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Nishkid64's RfA thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RfA, which closed successfully earlier today with a result of (60/9/4). Although, I encountered a few problems in my RfA, I have peacefully resolved my conflicts and made amends with the people involved. If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free talk to me. I hope I will live up to your expectations. --Nishkid64 22:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Translation

Sure, no problems.. (BTW, Wilaya comes from the Ottoman word vilayet, meaning administrative province, so I didn't translate it - same for département. préfecture is similar, it means administrative capital, daira I don't know, it must mean something like county, commune is the area around a city, generally it just means the city itself)

The Wilaya of Algiers (Arabic : ولاية الجزائر) is an administrative subdivision of Algeria, adopted from the old French département of Algiers.

Its préfecture (administrative capital) is Algiers. It has a population of 2.562.000 inhabitants.

  • Subdivisions of the wilaya
  • The wilaya of Algiers is divided into 13 daïras and 57 communes:

Question

How can I list a page in a category? I just created category:Constitutions of Turkey, but I cannot list the constitutions there even though I put a category:constitutions of turkey tag at the bottom of concerned pages.. Baristarim 06:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok i think i found out how.. :)) Baristarim 06:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Baristarim and A. Garnet independently proposed the splitting of the article, and Cretanforever edited the new articles with me. Hectorian and Nikosilver didn't object the idea. You're the only person out of 7 who did, and apparently you haven't even reading the talk pages. Will you restore it please? Miskin 18:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Inanna

Hi Khoikhoi. I comprehend your suspicion. But I am not the same Ajda. As for my username; I've borrowed it from Ajda Pekkan who is one of the most popular Turkish singers. "Ajda" is not a so common name and that makes it more attractive for used as a username. You can find hundreds of “Ajda” usernames in the internet. I should have written more stuff about my username. On the other hand, you don't know what it writes there because you're not a Turkish speaker. Inanna and Ajda17 are arguing there. :) Ajda 22:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR

Hatra article was vandalized long ago be "assyrian" members they claim it was an assyrian city, the problem is when you want to correct it they face with this :"try to add more than subtract", we will not accept lies on those articles and this article should be protected from vandalism.

On 11 August, an anonymous editor added the unsourced claim that there are 100,000 Gagauz in Brazil, but the "total population" numbers have not been updated. Should we do that, or remove the Brazil mention, or add them to the total but put a "citation needed" tag? Biruitorul 11:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you–the list looks much more professional now. Biruitorul 02:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for blocking the Greier/Bonaparte sock. However, he is back now as IP 220.130.115.44[15] and among other things just vandalized my talk page. - Mauco 20:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

'al hamaat-elements' ?? Where did you get it from? Chaldean 03:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I honestly do not know about Assyrians in Tatar. I caught that about 4 months ago, and I dont know who wrote it. Well is if there is any additional info on the net Chaldean 03:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Wow, according to this [[16]] there were 1,800 Assyrians in Krasnoyarsk Krai, so go try figure that out LOL. Chaldean 03:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I know, but I just found it wierd how there are 1,800 Assyrians all the way in Krasnoyarsk Krai. Chaldean 03:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Well I found this;[[[17]] "7. Mr. Arsen SAVVA (Kazan, Russia): Development of the Assyrian Historiography during Political Evolution in Russia (19th through 21st century).

Saturday, June 28, 2003 " - I'm guessing this guy is a representative of that Assyrian community. So I guess there must be some truth about Assyrian in Tataristan. Chaldean 03:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)