Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gongki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Satori Son (talk | contribs) at 13:55, 13 September 2006 (reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Doesn't meet WP:V -Nv8200p talk 18:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It's a historical game played in Korea, [1] explains it (even though I can't read it), and WP:RS specifically says that non-English sources can be used, so V is satisfied. However, someone fluent in Korean should translate some of the sources google picks up. ColourBurst 19:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete There are a few fundamental problems here with regards to WP:V. Firstly, we need someone, who understands Thai or Korean to verify this article. A Google search shows about 200 hits. But most of the webpages which mention the subject are in Thai. Well, personally, I have little doubts that this game exist. But the main problem here is that it is impossible (at least currently) to verify this article. One must remember that one of the key policies of Wikipedia is WP:V. Perhaps, we should bring this article to the attention of our Korean users? --Siva1979Talk to me 19:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete per Siva, unless someone fluent in the source language can help us out.  :) Dlohcierekim 00:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:V. While WP:RS does allow use of non-English sources, is says:
  1. "Where sources are directly quoted, published translations are generally preferred over editors performing their own translations directly."
  2. "Where editors use their own English translation of a non-English source as a quote in an article, there should be clear citation of the foreign-language original, so that readers can check what the original source said and the accuracy of the translation."
Here, the article itself doesn't provide any references at all, English or otherwise. And while one of us has maybe found a Korean language ref, we certainly don't have a published translation, and thus far no native speaking editor has verified that single source. --Satori Son 18:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • So even the name of the article might be wrong! This is exactly why the article should be deleted and only recreated when its notability and contents are verifiable by proper sourcing. Wikipedia is now the number one online reference source in the world - we need to get it right. --Satori Son 13:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]