Talk:Monica Lewinsky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 70.237.109.151 (talk) at 08:20, 4 September 2006 (→‎Lewinsky as slang for oral sex?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This page kinda sucks. It doesn't even give the time period when she was an intern in the white house. Basic facts about the story are missing. I'm a democrat looking for information on this and its no fun to see only part of the truth on ANY page of wikipedia. SystemBuilder 03:17, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Lewinsky currently studies an MSc in Social Philosophy at the London School of Economics.

Other Information

What is she studying? Where? --Gbleem 18:19, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lewinsky as slang for oral sex?

This article claims that the word lewinsky is now slang for oral sex? Do enough people use the word in this way to justify including this?

I think most everybody knows that a "lewinsky" is a blowjob. I first heard it on TV.

Lewinsky-Tripp Lawsuit

Why isn't there any information about the Lewinsky-Tripp lawsuit?

Settlement Amount

I have heard from a not-so-informed friend that Monica Lewinsky obtained $43,000,000 from the civil lawsuit against William J. Clinton? Was my friend inventing facts or is this correct? Can someone explain the pecuniary relief and if she and her lawyers obtained any money, what would the legal basis for it have been? He did not harass or rape her; it was consensual.

--66.81.192.18 04:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your friend is out to lunch on this one. There was no suit between Clinton and Lewinsky. There was one between Clinton and Paula Jones, which was later settled for $850,000. Lewinisky was on the witness list for the Jones case. My thinking is that your friend got confused. - Thanks, Hoshie | Grand Union Flag 11:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article

It seems this article has to do more with Clinton than it does with Monica...

deletion of probably false claim

I took out the raunchier than usual claim because it has appeared nowhere but in this article. If the person who added it can prove it is in the Start report, that will be news to everyone. Skywriter 21:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Sources for allegations

Shouldn't there be sources for claims such as monica having more than a passing interest in married faculty while in school?

-tamman2000 07/07/2006

Also, are there sources for the idea that people called it Monicagate? I know the -gate thing has been beaten past death, but did any credible sources apply it to this scandal? --BDD 03:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No impeachment

I removed a part of the article that claimed Clinton was impeached because, of course, he wasn't. There was an impeachment trial but he wasn't impeached.Lobot72 02:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Impeachment does not mean removal from office. If you go through the "impeachment trial" and remain in office you have still been impeached. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment --Ryan Wise 07:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]