Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massacres of civilian population by Israeli forces
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Propaganda piece. kingboyk 21:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to List of massacres as appropriate. --John Nagle 21:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep What about this article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anti-American_terrorist_incidents or this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_against_Israel?? Also propaganda? --Burgas00 21:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well, Violence_against_Israel starts off with "The neutrality of this article's title and/or subject matter is disputed." so, quite possibly it is, yes. --kingboyk 21:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- How about this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Hamas_suicide_attacks
- weak keep, and this is ONLY on the condition that the author goes back and documents the incident, numbers killed, with references. Otherwise, delete as unverified propoganda. Akradecki 22:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:POV and WP:OR. Any article that starts by defining the terms of its title has to be subjective. In the interests of balance you might want to list the others mentioned too (the Hamas one seems the best referenced but still quotes other Wikipedia articles as sources). Yomanganitalk 23:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:POV and WP:OR. Particularly with statements such as, Large scale civilian casualties resulting from airstrikes in urban areas are also considered massacres, which clearly states an opinion as a fact. --TheFarix (Talk) 01:16, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per TheFarix. WP is not a soapbox. Qana massacre for example is a redirect to 1996 shelling of Qana. The other linked pages are already covered by other massacre topics. Most of this subject matter is covered by Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. — RJH (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- You have clearly not read Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict properly. Practically none of these massacres are covered correctly in this article which happens to be extremely biased and POV. I still don't understand why there can be articles on violence against Israelis and not one on violence caused by the Israeli army.--83.33.226.192 15:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)