User talk:68.174.124.232

There is an obvious similarity to the content of this episode of South Park and The frank Zappa song TOKEN OF MY EXTREME.

Scientology and being in the closet are both dealt with in these two works.

Please stop deleting this interesting and relevant (in terms of the subject of the work) point of fact.

thank you.

The trivia you keep inserting regarding Frank Zappa

First of all, no evidence has been presented that it is verifiable information from a reliable source. Even if it is -- what is it, besides trivia? Does it give us a reason to look at the episode differently? Not really. Secondly, please acquaint yourself with the three-revert rule. You haven't broken it yet, but I want to be sure that you have received adequate notice. -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I've got an idea...

Maybe you can stop blaming me for the fact that Wikipedia has policies which prevent you from posting in any article whatever random factoids appear to have great significance to you. Hunh? I mean, yes, I have been here on Wikipedia several years, but strangely enough, I did not write the policies Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Reliable sources], or Wikipedia:No original research. Hey! And here's another idea! You could stop loud petty public whining about the fact that you are being asked to follow the same policies as everyone else! oh, no, wait -- sorry, what was I thinking? Why on earth should such a giant among men as 68.174.124.232 be possibly ever asked to even regard himself as the same species as the lowly chumps who have been working on Wikipedia for years? I mean, it's not as if any of them could actually know anything to which the mighty 68.174.124.232 might want to listen. No, no, obviously if anyone says anything to 68.174.124.232 that he doesn't want to hear, the only possible answer is that he should publicly make a loud announcement about "a pissing contest", rather than the somewhat less bombastic "someone thinks the material I want to include doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards, and I don't see why not". No, no, clearly the only appropriate response is a self-pitying accusation of a "tenacious attack" upon your precious noting of the fact that someone, somewhere, previously used "in the closet" in a work that also mentioned Scientology, which clearly could never have been a coincidence! -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

---