Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McChurch

Merge verifiable criticism to Megachurch and delete. —Hanuman Das 01:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems pretty well referenced, and I get 42,800 Google hits, so it's hardly a neologism by our standards. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a 16-year-old USA Today reference takes the 'neo' out of neologism here. --DarkAudit 02:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Andrew Lenahan - the term is notable. Kalani ^[talk] 02:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Andrew Lenahan. —C.Fred (talk) 04:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Andrew Lenahan. -- Gogo Dodo 06:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Andrew Lenahan. plus, use of Mc Church and Megachurch are differently connoted and not interchangeable, and the former is not just a subset of the latter, so a merge is not appropriate. --Svartalf 09:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, term is notable per the USA Today reference. Not a neologism. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 11:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu