Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rollonfriday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 193.133.69.162 (talk) at 15:33, 13 July 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rollonfriday

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks).

You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!

Procedural nomination; someone tried to db-bio this, but it's a website and so doesn't fit. No vote. --ais523 14:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete I did try that, but you are correct. The article reads like a "behind the scenes" of the forums right now, and does not give any reason as to why it is notable. Wildthing61476 14:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems to be just another website. Alexa ranking 390,000. Delete. DJ Clayworth 15:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete as part of it is definitely an attack on one of the forum's admins. This otherwise reads as an advertisement for the fourms. Wikipedia is neither a web directory nor free ad space. --DarkAudit 15:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speediest Delete This wikipedia entry should be deleted as it's not nearly as funny as it used to be. Lollers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lord Shaftington (talk • contribs) 16:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete It clearly is not "just another website" but one with a cultural reach far beyond it's intended readership. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hannibal s (talk • contribs) 16:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • put the electrodes on its danglage and send the poor lil minge to heaven. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Flying Wang (talk • contribs) 16:14, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • maybe it should be saved but first describe looks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lord Shaftington (talk • contribs) 16:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Duplicate vote, then deleted by caster. --ais523 15:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
    • The editors of the above 4 votes have only edited the article and this AfD. --ais523 15:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete The entry itself is worthy of inclusion due to its growing significance and influence. It is widely referenced within the legal press, and represents a refreshing and rapidly developing new facade to the legal scene. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.170.25.137 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The page has now been blanked by the author. Wildthing61476 15:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete - this website is a unique insight into the closed comminity of lawyers. It provides topical and interesting information on current thinking in law and the culture of law offices in the uk _ Longtermlurker

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rollonfriday&oldid=63615403"