User talk:Chris is me

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chris is me (talk | contribs) at 22:24, 11 July 2006 (→‎Wikipedians against notability). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

I will respond to comments on this page unless requested.

Talk Archives

User talk:Ccool2ax/000000-042506

User:Ccool2ax/sig

test This is a subpage for examples 13:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

test 2 Chris Ccool2ax 13:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the heads up on the vandalism of my user page. And if you think that I'm being a dick, please just email me or let know on my talk page; I saw the message on Hobson's talk page, but I really didn't know what specifically it referred to. Cheers --BaronLarf 23:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I meant to say "I know you think he's being a dick", not that you were. ill fix that.

Lol. No problem, either way.  :^) --BaronLarf 23:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my rotated IP!

69.19.14.31 is the IP I was assigned for the next indefinite period of time. I do not vandalize, and this makes me mad that I can't edit. Help me!

please!

Yes you do.
Done.--BaronLarf 03:40, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to your talk page

Since I'm not an admin, I'm afraid I can't go too much further than I already have. If you still feel there is an issue with the AOL user, request mediation or follow another protection route. Sorry I can't be more helpful. Nrbelex (talk) 19:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guadalajara key attractions

Hi! You tagged this as a PROD, since it was copied from a website. Fortunately, there is a faster route: you can tag it as a COPYVIO or tag it for speedy deletion. Here are some more tips on copyvios. -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 20:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Oh darn, I hate it when that happens. Well, at least you know your page is watched. ;-) DGX 04:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy Prod

Why did you prod the Family Guy pages? I don't really understand why. Zig 03:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even if all these Family Guy pages are deleted (EXTREMELY unlikely), people (like me) are going to bring them back. Please do not prod any more Family Guy episodes.- JustPhil 23:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah im probably not going to prod any more summaries... I'll just put {{citation}}: Empty citation (help) on them.

Boxen for your page

NN This user hates notability and how it is used mercilessly on AfD as policy.

User No Notability

No! As someone who agrees with the position expressed by the userbox (my nomination was, then, contradictory to my personal beliefs), I'm disappointed in this display of injustice. Good luck in finding it, and I'll be stealing the userbox mentioned on that page. ;-)--Lkjhgfdsa 21:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I'm pretty sure no one broke policy to delete it. While I agree with the sentiment, I can see how that could be considered divisive. I think things seem to be going the way of eventually having userboxes out of the template space; I've made sure everything on my userpage has the code there. Also means nobody can change my boxes if they update the templates :) .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 07:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I'm really interested in getting to know more people who oppose notability - let me know how I can help! For great justice. 21:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I voted! For great justice. 21:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To VandalProof

To vandalproof moderators:

YOu may notice the unblock request on my talk page. allow me to explain. I am part of HughesNet, an intenet service that picks from a pool of IP addresses every time the router is unused for ten minutes (roughly). One night, an IP i received was banned due to another HughesNet user's vandalism. That is the purpose of the unblock request. I only intend to use VandalProof to stop vandalism, not cause it. Thank you for considering me to use your software. -- Chris Ccool2ax contrib. 04:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Ccool2ax,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that for security reasons, VandalProof's creator requires it's users to have made 250 edits to articles, which you have not. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Glen TC (Stollery) 10:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC) Bold text[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Awareness

You may like to show your involvment in this project with a userbox I've created and saved into my userspace for now. It's likely to change (and indeed you are most welcome to try and improve it), so it's probably best not to subst it for now. The code you need is {{User:Xyrael/Templates/User WikiProject Awareness}}; thanks for your continued interest in this project. --Xyrael T 21:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WP:1.0 Team!

Hi, and thank you for signing up for the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team! I wanted to find out what areas interest you. A few possibilies:

  • Right now we are busy trying to review Version 0.5 nominations, I'd like to get up to 500 articles approved for Version 0.5 by the end of the month. If you're interested, please sign up for the Review Team.
  • In parallel with this, the Work via WikiProjects group (WVWP) is contacting all of the projects for a second time. This necessitates a major revamp of our information organisation, including the creation of a new summary list to keep track of things. We're asking projects to provide us with a list of their most important articles. The group worked with Oleg Alexandrove to adapt Mathbot so it can produce worklist information for the projects, so we are encouraging them to use that system. In just a few weeks, we've reached a point where almost 12,000 articles have been assessed with our scheme and tracked by the bot! If you're interested in WVWP, let me know and I can explain the details.
  • If core topics are more your thing, we need someone to go through the Core Topics Supplement and assess the articles, as well as adding a template (to be written).

Although we have a lot of people signed up, there are only a handful of active people trying to do an immense amount of work, so I hope you can help. It is very worthwhile! Thanks, Walkerma 00:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. The review process for V0.5 is very simple, it is simply one reviewer checking at two criteria:- importance and quality. Regarding quality, we can only look at things like quality of English, layout, appropriate use of references and pictures, and completeness. Completeness is just as well as you can judge - e.g. a bio on a writer should have a "Life" and a "Works" section of some length, and probably also "influence" or "legacy". If the article is on a core topic like "Physics" or "Animal", or a country/global city we will accept a much lower standard, typically a decent B-Class. If the article is something less important like 1 Ceres, we expect it to be at least A-Class. You can find a more thorough description here. Hope you can help us out, many thanks, Walkerma 04:57, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To VandalProof mods (2)

You may notice that my Main edit count is just below 250. However, for the past year my ISP used a dynamic IP which caused many login problems and blocks (to my IP never this username). I made approximately 100 edits to the Main namespace then, bringing my edit count to 315. -- Chris is me (user/review/talk)

I added my name to the VandalProof Talk page. I forgot to log in. -- Chris Ccool2ax contrib. 13:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ccool2ax! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. —Xyrael / 06:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 06:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) —Xyrael / 18:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedians against notability

Hi, thanks for the suggestion! I won't be joining this cat, though, as I generally don't like factions at Wikipedia, even if I agree with their arguments. Regards, Ziggurat 21:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On a completely unrelated subject, I noticed your essay here and thought you might like to change "He attempted to bring down Seigenthaler by slandering him on a biography page he created". If I remember correctly, it was a joke edit that slipped through the cracks rather than a deliberate attempt at bringing Seigenthaler down. All the best! Ziggurat 21:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestion! I put it on Wikipedia as a gimmick for people in my class to read the essay. I might take it down later since WP:NOT a free web host, but i guess its only 10k at most. -- Chris Ccool2ax contrib. 22:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chris_is_me&oldid=63308228"