Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluoride poisoning
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article is currently two sentences long, and any content here would be a duplicate of the information already in Fluoride and Water fluoridation. Tried changing to redirect, a user insists on reverting. Rhobite 02:59, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
- No vote. Someone else's noncompleted nomination. Mikkalai 02:57, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- KEEP. I JUST created this article and will include relevant information about the issue. I require a few days to work on this article. Then, you can decide if to keep or delete.--AAAAA 03:02, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Why keep it around as a stub then? You could always change it from a redirect at the same time that you added significant information to it. Right now it's a substub, and we delete substubs or turn them into redirects until they grow up. I still think that there is no possible information that could go in this article but be off-topic in one of the other two. Rhobite 03:20, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Valid topic of great public interest. The initial article was basically a disputed and controversial claim presented as fact, and there's now been an edit war featuring the same player, but that's not grounds for deletion. The debate over the redirect belongs in the user page, not here. Andrewa 03:37, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Given that Water fluoridation includes a section on the controversy, information that might go into this article would be more useful there. AAAAA, if you think the opposition to fluoridation is slighted on Water fluoridation, it would help if you'd add your material there. JamesMLane 03:38, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)