User talk:Richss
Feel free to say something.
Order of prog lang sample implementations in algorithm articles
Hi, Richss. The articleis about the algorithm not about prog langs, thus the reason why the shortest implementations first. Alphabetical order is good when political correctness or the like are in order. This is not the case. It is not a matter of giving preference to one or another prog lang, it is a matter of keeping the interests of the reader of the article as the main guide. With some of the longest samples among the first, an alphabetical ordering makes it very hard for the article reader to realize that there are vastly different ways of expressing the quicksort algorithm in different prog langs. Just imagine if someone comes with an assembler implementation that takes 200 lines... — danakil 23:38, Sep 7, 2004 (UTC)