Talk:Automatic gain control
The discussion in the article, currently in the second paragraph, about the operation and effects of channel fading in AM radio, and how it can be repaired with an automatic gain control, is suspect.
- I don't clearly understand the AM radio example in this article. Is there maybe Automatic gain control (AGC), because the power the AM radio receives gets less and less the further we move away from the sending mast? Thus, the signal nets to be amplified (i.e. "normalized"), and that just is what AGC does?
- Thanks, --Abdull 18:14, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, you are correct - as you move away from the transmitter, the signal strength you receive on your radio gets weaker, and the AGC automatically increases the amplification of the signal so that you don't notice any difference when listening to the radio. The signal can also be affected by other factors, such as another transmitter operation nearby with a similar frequency, which interferes with the transmission you are trying to pick up. AGC will automatically adjust the gain to take care of this too. Obviously it also works in reverse - if you get closer to the transmitter, the signal will become stronger, and the AGC will reduce the amplification so that your radio doesn't get louder.
- Hope this helps -- Kim 8:00, 18 Jul 2005 (UTC)
It is usually [not] advantageous to reduce the gain of the front end of the receiver, which has benefits for both the amount of noise in the signal, and performance in the presence of strong signals, such as blocking rejection.
I removed the 'not' in the above. I believe it's incorrect to say that running the front end at full gain improves performance on strong signals - it does the opposite! The reason receivers block is that the front end gets totally saturated, pushed well into its non-linear region and effectively 'jammed'. If the gain is reduced, it can remain linear and handle the signal. Maintaining linear operation is also essential for reducing unwanted intermodulation distortion, and lower gain means lower noise too. This applies equally to AM and FM receivers - good FM designs will have AGC on the front end for exactly these reasons - it is a frequently mentioned fallacy that 'FM receivers don't need AGC'. Yes they do if they are to be any good! Cheap designs might omit it, but professional systems never do, especially for narrow band FM receivers. FM and AM receiver AGC design is different however - in FM, only the front end is usually adjusted, the IF stages are allowed to saturate to take maximum advantage of the capture effect, and these stages operate at full gain the whole time. This is OK since the front end and IF conversion keep out-of-band signals out of the IF chain (and the front-end AGC keeps the input signal level at a comfortable level that the IF chain can handle without blocking). AM receivers on the other hand must always be linear to preserve the modulation. Thus the two designs will differ considerably, with no AGC in the IF chain on FM, but AGC in the IF chain on AM. Both designs will benefit where AGC is applied to the front end.Graham 01:10, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- THis sounds like you are talking about gain compression--Light current 07:45, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Adaptive and automatic
Is adaptive gain control the same as automatic gain control? —ShaneCavanaugh 07:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Depends on how it adapts I suppose. 'Adaptive' sounds more intelligent to me than automatic. AGC is just designed to keep the output level constant with varying inpu. What does adaptive do?--Light current 20:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)