Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panty waste

Panty waste

I had speedied it but the creator politely asked me to restore it. It's un-encyclopedic, maybe it could be moved to wiktionary. Mushroom 15:00, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Mushroom 15:14, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete...or transwiki if someone can confirm this to be a widely-used term. I've never heard of it, but I've also (thanking God right now for this) never had to deal with vaginal smegma. *Shudder*... JHMM13 (T | C) 15:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I would state that a quick google of the term shows that it IS a widely used term (when spelled as it is here)Pickelbarrel 17:35, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• delete, it's a dict def at best, and already at Wiktionary. I suggest future expansion takes place to the article there. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 15:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• As UkPaolo points out, the word is actually pantywaist, which has nothing to do with vaginas. The creator of the article is arguing (on my talk page) that the fact that the word has been used in a movie, showing its occurrence in popular culture, makes it encyclopaedia-worthy. That is a patently flawed argument, as there are lots of words that one can find used in movie dialogue. A word being used in a well-known work doesn't make an encyclopaedia article. Quotations make dictionary articles, not encyclopaedia articles. A quotation, showing a word in use in context in a well-known work, is straightforward dictionary article content. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Delete. Uncle G 16:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, with venom and prejudice too. This is vile, badly written trash. It is, at best, a dictionary definition (not that we generally go about defining slang words here... *cough*Wiktionary*cough*). A vulgar attempt at humour. Dan 18:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: an article entitled Pantywaist (spelt correctly) exists on here too. As nothing more than a one line dict def already in wiktionary, I have (temporarily) made it a redirect to Panty waste. Should this article be deleted, the redirect Pantywaist should go as well. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 19:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; first of all; the proper "word" is pantywaist and has nothing to do with what the article panty waste refers to. [1]. At any rate, delete pantywaist as a dicdef/slang and delete panty waste as someone hearing the word "pantywaist", spelling it wrong and inventing their own meaning for it. Peyna 19:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete'. This stuff belongs on Wiktionary. enochlau (talk) 21:57, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As has been mentioned, the redirect from pantywaist is going in the wrong direction. The first definition given on this page is competely bogus. The second is a bit more accurate. Pantywaist can stay in Wiktionary with its correct definition. Crunch 01:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)