User talk:Sherurcij

Thanks

Questions/Comments

Image tags

Amusing people who complain about me

Melchoir not interested.

- Even if Melchoir won't, give me an IM. Yes I'm 15, and I'm a writer and a good student. So don't get all "Dumb kids" on me (Darktrix666@hotmail.com) MagneticUnderlay 13:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm not really in the habit of giving my eMail address out to people who I have to sit and argue with whether their "brand new religion" belongs in an encyclopaedia. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (bounties)} 13:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

I understand, honestly. I had a lot of coffee tonight, with a bunch of friends and got a bit stupid. At least do me the courtesy of looking at my DevArt page. Much of that reflects the person i really am. When i'm not high on Coffee & Atmosphere.MagneticUnderlay 13:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Out of random interest, since neither you nor your friends had any previous edits on Wikipedia...why stick that stuff here? Sherurcij ^{(talk) (bounties)} 13:51, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Something of a test, i guess, we've talked about it before. I'v edited once or twice before, but legitimate ones. and just as my IP address. And really, just send me a message, it's not like i'm always like this. Or just contact me on DevArt. Don't be so violently abhorrant. MagneticUnderlay 14:02, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Not at all violent, just not in the habit of talking to complete strangers with whom I have nothing in common, no offence meant of course Sherurcij ^{(talk) (bounties)} 14:11, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

-Suit yourself, i suppose. Certainly I'd like to talk to Melchoir, but he ignored me completely. For what it's worth. I sincerely apologise for any distress i may have caused. And really, i appreciate your role on Wiki. One last time, I'd really like to 'chat' with you. I think you'll find we have more in common than nothing, at the very least. MagneticUnderlay 14:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Read your...

...userpage and I think your reason for being on Wikipedia is admirable and interesting. Thought you might be interested in reading an article I recently started on another interesting but long-forgotten man, Paul Boyton. · Katefan0^(scribble)/mrp 23:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

you're welcome.

any time, good sir. it appears to be my niche.

Dlayiga 21:43, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Nosharia

Hi Sherurcij! Please take a look at this Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Nosharia Vs Wikipedia:Username and other possible infringements. Cheers -- Szvest 17:33, 28 December 2005 (UTC)  ^{Wiki me up™}

My reversion, your cleanup

I have responded on the talk page. I also reverted Cam's last edit, which was bizarre, to your last edit - maybe he is trying to quote the news outlet, but he is wrong. KI 04:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Response

We have already taken many photographs. I will start to upload them as soon as I am back here in the US. Wikizach 17:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Happy new year

Hi Sherurcij, it's your partner-in-crime for writing Rumours and conspiracy theories about the July 2005 London bombings; I saw you're on-line so I decided to stop by and say Happy New Year. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 08:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

wikiproject

Thanks for the invite.

Sorry, I should have replied to your earlier... I had a guy who was following me around, and nominating articles I started for deletion. It felt almost like he was stalking me. He accused me, a number of times, or having a "posse", who reversed his edits. I probably shouldn't have paid any attention to him. -- Geo Swan 02:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

1n4dl01d81c212547

I deleted the article as non-notable - the content seems to be about a lost car, and since it had been saved I assumed it was essentially ready as an article. Lost cars are clearly non-notable unless some reason is given for them being otherwise. Your comment on my talk page mentioned terrorism, and looking at the date and the fact that the article appears to be US-based, I assume that it's something to do with the 11 September attacks, but nothing in the article actually says that.

I now accept that the article may be significant, but the context should have been made clearer.

jimfbleak 09:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

IfD Noms

I was cleaning up some of the images you had listed for deletion [1]. Only two were deleted as they went through with no objections, the others were all Commons images and you would have to list for deletion there (some already were). Click on the description links for more info. --Wgfinley 07:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

SWC

Hello there. We have a mutual acquaintance, as you already known. --Matthew A. Lockhart 06:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Qur'an Picture Vote

You have expressed your views in the discussion of the Qur'an picture. However, you still have not voted in the straw poll. Please vote in the straw poll to make your position official. Thanks. joturner 18:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

October Surprise

Your recent edit inadvertently deleted this text and made the page a redirect to October surprise. It has been reverted. No damage done. --Wetman 15:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Criminals

Just one (very, very) minor correction. The category I'm mostly cleaning is Category:Criminals. My goal is to get most, if not all, of the specific people out of that category. A lot of them are already in subcats. The ones that are not already in subcats, the easiest subcats to put them in are generally the ones down Criminals by nationality, thus that's where they are ending up. As I do it, especially the actions where I'm dropping the more general cats, I've developed a number of other cateories besides Criminals that can also be dropped if the article is already in certain subcats. For example, if an article is in Fooian murderers, then Criminals, Murderers, and Fooian criminals can all go. So I am ending up cleaning up more than just the one cat. But, for now, the main Criminals cat is where I'm woking out of. - TexasAndroid 17:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Far.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Far.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gmaxwell 21:10, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

9/11 photo

Hello again Sherurcij. The image Image:28661 512.jpg has no source information, and will be deleted unless we can figure out its source. I was hoping you could save it. Do you happen to know where it comes from? – Quadell ^{(talk) (bounties)} 05:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Iraqi_girl_smiles_redux.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Iraqi_girl_smiles_redux.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 06:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

from user:jayanthv86

I was going through old pages and came accross a blocked user by the name Freedomoffighter. I saw his abusive comments.I really appreciate your patience,you unblocking him twice.Really,it was a superhuman task by you.--Jayanthv86 18:19, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:TerryRatzmann.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:TerryRatzmann.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Thanks for your help, perhaps further action

Thanks for your help in maintaining Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Ratzmann. I've left a message with User:Rx StrangeLove to see if we can get the sockpuppets blocked or have the page semi-protected or some other action. Thanks again for your help! EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 05:41, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

AfD

Go suck a fuck. MKBR3 05:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Okay, what the hell? How does one suck a fuck? Please, let me introduce you to a dictionary. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 05:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)