Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hijacking Guild

Hijacking Guild

Admins will take into account if certain editors do not have many edits before voting on this AfD. So creating an account to vote or using multiple IPs will not help.

This is a page about a nn group of spammers. It seems similar to GNAA but less notable DeleteCastAStone 01:51, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete with extreme prejudice. I have more google hits than these guys. Why not delete the GNAA while you're at it? -- Vary | Talk 01:58, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete How bout no, what does it matter to you? We are spread over various sites so I really doubt that you have more "hits", not that it matters in any case. Way to kill freedom of speech...—the preceding unsigned comment is by 172.145.15.152 (talk • contribs) CleverScreenName (talk · contribs) later substituted his/her own signature in place of the {{unsigned}} notice; it was CleverScreenName's third edit, the first two being to his/her user page.

• Don't Delete because Vary and CastAStone need a life and need to learn to leave other people alone ScarfaceEvaStar
• Delete per nom. Cyberevil 03:19, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Wow - 43 whole google hits! [1] Delete. Blackcats 04:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete gren グレン 04:37, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete because we have much of a right to tell about ourselves as this group of software crackers Phrozen Crew does..way to hand out "liberty and justice for all"—the preceding unsigned comment is by 72.146.65.79 (talk • contribs)
• Don't Delete because this is supposed to be an impartial encyclapedia. They havent done any harm, so there is no reason to censor them. Freedom of speech dosent just imply freedom from government censorship, but also from censorship by a few offended individuals. —the preceding unsigned comment is by 205.188.117.70 (talk • contribs)
• Delete per nom. -- Antaeus Feldspar 05:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Dont Delete,Freedom of speech.This is not a dictatorship so let them stay — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.181.2.16 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nominator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, forumcruft. "Freedom of speech" does not mean complete anarchy. — JIP | Talk 09:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually yes it can, read the Bill of Rights sometime, or in fact go to elementary school - either one will work
• question couldnt care less one way or another whether this stays or not, but whats the difference between this group and the Phrozen Crew they talk about? IE why have one and not the other Jcuk 10:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Elementary. Phrozen Crew is/were (don't know if they're gone or not) famous. This lot isn't. --Agamemnon2 12:50, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Perhaps Elementary if you know about such things. I dont. Never heard of either of 'em. Jcuk 16:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-02 10:44Z
• Delete it reads like the braggings of a group of school children. Of no use or notability doktorb | words 11:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. And please, Meatpuppets, leave this alone. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:11, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete I have a better idea, nn groups meet CSD A7 =) Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete under the expanded CSD A7.  RasputinAXP  _{talk contribs} 14:10, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • In no way are we affilated with racist or any type of 'hate' groups, many people we know consist of different races, religions, and sexual preferences. We have our page up for a damn day and a big group of people jump to conclusions, we are not bad people at all...you are
• Delete, delete, delete, delete, delete. Tim Pierce 14:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per JIP. Dan 19:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Non notable hacker orginazation Deathawk 19:40, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete We are not hackers
    • That comment was made by: User:172.155.106.168 Dan 21:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)