User talk:Beckjord

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Martial Law (talk | contribs) at 23:25, 29 December 2005 (→DanielCD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello Beckjord, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 22:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe

Zoe. What is happening on the Bigfoot page is that a skeptic is trying to stop good edits from a professional in that field.

DreamGuy is that ****.

beckjordBeckjord 19:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe is not always right

Zoe.

She says

We have a couple of editors who claim to have seen Bigfoot, and are unable to accept the possibility that other people don't believe them.

Wrong. I can accept that lots of people do not believe. This is America. beckjordBeckjord 19:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply] 

When skeptical information and references to skeptics are included in the article, they insist on deleting it.

Wrong. I delete a libellous reference, (50 items, resulting in lawsuit)and I CORRECT skeptical errors and altered bad info from uninormed skeptics who __do no research__ beckjordBeckjord 19:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply] 

Beckjord thinks they're transdimensional beings who can move between dimensions.

Wrong. I say they could be, and we have proof. beckjordBeckjord 19:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply] 

User:Zoe|(talk) 19:16, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I keep getting people adding their comments to the talk of the page and I have to hunt through the whole thing to find them, I thought stealing your message link might help.

If he has reverted again, after my warning, I'll have to block him. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:20, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

I was never warned. I saw something, AFTER I was blocked. You thinkl people read messages instantly?

beckjordBeckjord 19:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, like we're supposed to believe somebody who scorns consensus with "amateurs". User:Zoe|(talk) 19:25, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I DO scorn "concensus" with people who have no experience in the field, do not read the lit and who often can be just high school drop outs with a computer. In science, "concensus" is done with QUALIFIED PEOPLE. Usually, with advanced degrees in the topic. In Wiki, you can be a total nobody and then edit. As for belief, I have photos that some professionals do like. Also, how ya gonna prove interdimensionsal travel? It will take 1000 years to get the tools. Zoe- I do not care if you personally believe, but if you work witrh DreamGuy, you are on the dark side. You guys seem to feel that the skeptical side is worth 50% when they do only 1% research. What they do, (sit) is not worth two sec of reading.

More disgusted with Wiki each day.

beckjordBeckjord 19:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]





"Consensus" with three editors who do not know the topic is meaningless.

beckjordBeckjord 19:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What is happening is that you and Martial Law are trying to rule the page, and nobody can claim ownership of a page. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:53, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

endless edits

I see this all over Wiki, in all topics.

Makes me not respect Wiki. Neither does NY Times.

beckjordBeckjord 20:05, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe

No. It is DreamGuy the skeptic who is trying to rule the page.

Think about this --- he keeps deleting back to where it says that Bigfoot has SMALL eyes

and a SMALL head. This is obvious foolishness, not backed by any reference, and all the authors say the opposite.

And do not tell me to "work it out" with dg. He does not respond. He is a vandal.

beckjordBeckjord 19:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See Bigfoot page edited better, outside of Wiki

See ongoing edits trying to make this page real, go to http://www.beckjord.com/bigfoot/wikipage.html There at least, fools, idiots,skeptics, and morons (nobody is named here) cannot do endless reverts and edits.

beckjordBeckjord 20:04, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Remember:....

Keep things civil, NO more personal attacks on anyone, no more inflamatory material at all, not even in the slightest. A Admin has threatened to have you blocked to end this dispute, thus is why I am offering you and other disputants the use of MY user page, so I can mediate this matter without disturbing others.

I'll see what THE BOSS has said. If he favors you, I'll tell you. If he has NOT,I'll tell you. He is the boss. This is the equivalent of going before The King, a person who can have you summarily tossed out. Martial Law 22:19, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re Jimbo

I blush -- I went on his page, discussed the situation, and am not sure he replied to my page, because I screwed up and erased lots of the page because there was a big overload, and maybe I erased what he may have said, if he said anything. I guess I'll go back to his page and see if he said anything there.

beckjordBeckjord 07:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So far, nothing at this time.

By the way, a User:Cyde Weys says that Bigfoot has died in 11-26-2002, and that you are incorrect about photographing him 17 times. Bigfoot was the nickname of a Ray Wallace, who appearantly had BIG feet.

CydeWeys or Cyde Weys

Please show me proof Bigfoot died in 11-16-02 Please tell me why my photos are not true, or rather, why you do not like them. BTW, I knew Ray Wallce, in person, and his feet were normal. His fake feet could not make a mark in most dirt because the user never had much weight. Also his fake feet never moved, and left the same mark, if any, a dead giveaway. No flexibilty, as any 10 yr old could see.

Reply here.

Martial Law - contact me on email and use a free email account that you can get at http://www.yahoo.com -- I have lots of info for you, on a personal basis. My email is rudy(at) stealthaccess.net A number of Wiki people have gone to my email.

beckjordBeckjord 07:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Will have my E-mail examined real shortly. Hopefully, it'll be fixed. Martial Law 08:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Buggy E-mail: Another User accuses You of criminal action User Beckjord

Another User told me that you had allegedly sent him some bugs in his E-mail. Am investigating, since sending viruses is a Federal Offense/Criminal offense, may also be classed as terrorisim, and this can have the Feds after you. This is no insult, accusation,etc. at all. Again, will investigate. Is this what you are referring to when you say that people are out to, as you say, to "get you" ? The 9-11 attacks has made this sort of crime worse.Martial Law 08:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC) Martial Law 08:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

let him prove it

no fear.

I do not know __how__ to send viruses.

Let him report me. He will have to use his REAL NAME ! :-)

beckjordBeckjord 09:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Remember, keep this civil, thus NO

  • Profanity
  • Inflamatory remarks
  • Uncivil behavior.
  • Personal Attacks

None of this @ any time @ all. This is Wikipedia policy. As stated, a Admin. has stated that he will block you, maybe have you tossed for being disruptive.

Another reason to be real civil: This User is a woman, and if you're "Old School", you do NOT use any bad language/ uncivil language around women at all.

Of course, she may be just joking. Wikipedians often do this. Do NOT take offense. Martial Law 04:12, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seen you post to the Boss. You're progressing well. One other thing, lose that other account before someone gets the idea you're using sockpuppets, and that can be used against you. YUCK !

stop this

Sometimes people forget to log in, and this makes you think they are a sock puppet (big Wiki paranoia) when they really just forgot to log in. Besides, I always sign my name. Remember, Wiki is a big joke and mishmash with 524 people, it is said, doing 50% of all edits, and imho, the main "trip" jhere is not information, but disrupting other people's article pages with edits and reverts. DreamGuy himself, with a Wiki-warning label saying "This site is not considered accurate, (etc)" on his Mythology page, had dozens of users editing and reverting on that page of his. All over, on almost all pages, people with no knowledge, or just a little knowledge (worse) are editing, editing, reverting, reverting, thousands of times a day or more. Click,click, punch,punch, over and over. Revert, re-re-revert, re-re-re-revert, and so on. An endless mess. I'm not sure if one's own name-page, or name-article page, like my own, is sacred and untouchable, butr if it is, I may have to add sections in it, if allowed, to describe what Bigfoot is or is not, since the Bigfoot official page is always a mess, with reverts, and re-reverts, etc, all the time, that eliminate often good changes. Each article is a roiling sea, a soup boiling, always changing, and not always for the better.

End of rant.

beckjordBeckjord 07:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As new verified ( WP:V ) info is discovered, the old info. is tossed as being out of date and obsolete. When you Edit the Bigfoot article, for instance, you need at least four (4) verifiable sources of info. This reduces the chances of your edit being tossed. Martial Law 09:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, DreamGuy will toss it anyway

got it?

beckjordBeckjord 09:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Go to my User page and see WP:SOCK protocol. I am NOT insulting, accusing you of anything @ all, just stating a major concern. Martial Law 04:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In Wikipedia, a sockpuppet is like a really servere case of the Shingles. Martial Law 04:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

explain this in detail

do not get it.

beckjordBeckjord 08:07, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ask David Letterman about the Shingles. Martial Law 04:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ask david

Sure, next time we have lunch.

-)

BeckjordBeckjord 07:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cyde Weys

Sideways -- good movie.

Well, only gullible people accept newspaper reports about "Bigfoot exposed as hoax!"

Ray Wallace (I knew him) was a genial old fraud who made one lousy Bigfoot hoax movie with perhaps his wife in a monkey suit. I watched it in his home and laughed. Too funny to get upset over.

Bigfoot has been seen in Florida, and in Ohio, (by me) and in Hawaii. I doubt old Ray could get there. There are 18,000 or so sightings since 1811. I doubt Ray was there in 1811, nor in the other places. Do not believe all you read in the papers. I also doubt Ray could jump over my head from a tree, disappear, and then leave 16 inch tracks in mud and grass, that led to a fence, and then jumped, (say two witnesses) and NEVER COME DOWN. No tracks in next 200 ft of mud. Pure mud.

Nope, not ol' Ray....

---gotcha!!!!!

All wikians who want private talk, email me at rudy(at)stealthaccess.net

Now, Cyde Ways or is it Cyde ?

You, say,"Aha, so we have a Bigfoot person here..."

well, then get DreamGuy off my a**. OK? He is the "Revert King of Bigfoot Page"

has a nice ring to it--- 'The Revert King".

-)

beckjordBeckjord 08:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

$1M Bounty on Bigfoot withdrawn / Bigfoot Sources on Google / Beckjord on Google

You have to see this link:

$1,000,000 Bigfoot Bounty Withdrawn

For you, persuant to Wikipedia Civility deal: On Google, found:

Bigfoot-Creature: 332,000 websites and data sites.
Bigfoot:Cryptid: 12,300 websites and data sites.

Go to www.boingboing.net, then go to the archives page if the incl. link is malfunctioning. Martial Law 09:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

this is old

but thanks.

BeckjordBeckjord 09:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Total found: 354,300 websites and data sites concerning the Bigfoot creature found using the Google Search Engine Martial Law 09:28, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedians want verifiable sources ? You have them. Some of these sources believe it is a ape, some believe it is a myth or mental illness, some believe it is a paranormal entity. Martial Law 09:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Google Search on subject: User:Beckjord: 18,100 websites, data sites. @ least 1/2 are hostile to this subject, the other 1/2 are friendly towards this subject. Martial Law 09:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

your search

18,000 sites on Beckjord or Bigfoot?

I would think Bigfoot.

Only a few sites are worth a damn.

beckjordBeckjord 09:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

bf sites dedicated or mentioned?

most just mention. Far less are dedicated to topic. \ Less than ten are worth a damn.

Most started by anonymous teens.

BTW, Cyde Ways impressed I am here, for good or for evil.

beckjordBeckjord 10:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RE.: Your Search

18,100 websites and data sites on YOU. Martial Law 09:42, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly 354,300 websites and data sites on Bigfoot as creature and cryptid. Enjoy. Martial Law 09:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also RE.: $1,000,000 Bounty on Bigfoot link. Pixes of a real Bigfoot is around $90,000. Cheers. Martial Law 09:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

-at the time the news was announced, in 2005, on the indicated link. Martial Law 09:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

$90,000

post details and source.

beckjordBeckjord 09:59, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Martial Law

call me now, this second, 510-633-2526

fear not.

beckjordBeckjord 09:58, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

REVERT TRAP

User:Cyde has accused you of this: Original Research in the Bigfoot article.

DO NOT FALL INTO IT. IF YOU DO, YOU WILL BE BLOCKED. They want you to REVERT them. DON'T DO THIS !!!!

They know you'll revert this matter, thus is the trap, to get you blocked. Martial Law 10:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RE.: Source: / RE.: $90,000

www.boingboing.net/2005/10/18/1_million_cryptid_bo.html - Both the now withdrawn $1,000,000 and the $90,000 for a pix. Was a promo for a RPG - Role Playing Game, such as Magic, The Gathering.Martial Law 10:37, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

editing bigfoot page

if I cannot edit this page, there is no point in being part of Wikipedia.

Also, my past edits did contain references and sources.

Also, Martial Law , when will you call me (show courage most Wiki people do-not-have-

and call me.)? I have hot news!


beckjordBeckjord 19:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

reverting items that were put in by DreamGuy on his judgement

Now DG is saying that it is wrong to list websites for reporting a sighting, because he says it is silly, and not something a pedia should be doing. Yet, in WIKI there are three sites that do allow this type of thing for those topics.

NOw if I restore the item, can he get me blocked? I am GETTING SO SICK OF WIKI.

I am beginning to not care. There are things I am learning about Wiki from former members that make me disgusted. Things other wiki members do know, but ignore. Cannot discuss it here, sorry, Wiki police.... Entire place smacks of the book "1984" by George Orwell. Beware "Big Brother".....always watching YOU!

So, how do I edit out the b*ll Sh*t that DG puts in and how do I restore items I put in that he deleled without getting blocked? Hey, all you spies? All you folks who listen in?Tell me. Because what DG is doing is flat wrong. Much of Wiki is flat wrong. The entire concept is wrong. PEOPLE WHO DO NOT READ THE LIT, SHOULD NOT EDIT.

beckjordBeckjord 19:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Coast To Coast AM

If you got news, take it to the radio show Coast To Coast AM. Found some Wikipedians who actually listen to the show. Just keep me out of it., and don't rant and lose your temper on the show either. I've seen evidence that Art Bell and George Noory have tossed guests out for less.

By the way, when do you go on the show again ? Martial Law 19:43, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

c to c

they are capricious and put on hoaxers and thieves more often than me.

My news is for you, personally. Wiki police are listening to this page.

call.

beckjordBeckjord 19:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If and when I get the chance. Martial Law 20:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shockers

Want to buy a Bigfoot suit ? Go to Rent/Buy Bigfoot Costumes http://www.mcavendesigns.com to rent or buy a Bigfoot suit. THAT IS THE MOST STUPID THING I HAVE EVER SEEN. WHAT ARE THESE IDIOTS ON ? GOOD WAY TO GET SHOT BY SOMEONE ! Martial Law 20:37, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to access this one off Wikipedia. Martial Law 20:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

More bigfoot links:

More to follow. Martial Law 20:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You out there ? You rent or buy one of these things, then you go stomping out there in the woods, etc. Then you get your rear end shot off. You need to talk to George Noory, Art Bell about this. Their E-mails is on http//:www.coasttocoastam.com. Someone could get killed wearing a suit of this type. What are these people thinking ? Martial Law 20:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

why?

why keep repeating this? We got the point a week ago.

beckjordBeckjord 05:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bigfoot Suit ?

Yes, the store link is on this link: Unexplainable Homepage Martial Law 20:56, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Type in http//:www,unexplainable.net/bigfoot to access the place selling these apalling suits.Martial Law 21:00, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

repeat

You are obsessed with bigfoot suits. Time to move on.

beckjordBeckjord 21:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This proves that there are idiots who will hoax a bigfoot. Martial Law 22:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Beckjord, I would like to help you, but I simply don't know how. The only way I can help you is if your edits are defensible. You need to learn some writing/research and debateing skills, as well as some tact.

No- I am dealing with deliberate vandalism

my opponents are SET on keeping negative info, even if they have to fabricate it or make false changes to good info. There is NO "good faith". These are not good people. You are naive, DanielCD.

beckjordBeckjord 05:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply] 

I don't know how you can learn this, but I know I don't have time anymore to help you. Your views are not scientifically backed up,

you do not get it

there is no scientific funding for Bigfoot research. All the real work is done by laymen.

I show you the best there is, as it is, and you need to view that and not expect Professor X to get out there and find the same things, because nobody will PAY him to go.NO FUNDING. There is no science in Bigfoot, DanielCD. No grants, no funding. And the scientists do not know where to start anyway. We do. Did you EVER think this was a scientific subject? Proof of my claims -- visit me, and see the Brian Smith video of disappearing tracks IN PERSON. Buy a plane ticket, fly out. dDid you expect us to place the video on Wiki to please UNKNOWN people??? Reallllllllyyy.

beckjordBeckjord 06:04, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply] 

and they have no backing other than you or someone else's say so.  There are rules to scholarship and debate that simply cannot be bypassed without throwing out credibility as well.

repeat

science is NOT involved in Bigfoot. Our say-so? What about multible witnesses? Are we chopped liver? Do we all need a PhD? THERE IS NO DEAD BODY TO EXAMINE, DANIELCD. It is paranormal.

beckjordBeckjord 06:04, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of it is not the content of your edits anyway, it's the way you format them. They have to be in harmony with the entire article. You can't just throw sections in on this and that.

Judge the entries on their merits. Not style. \ beckjordBeckjord 05:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, good luck. --DanielCD 21:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

defensible edits and DanielCD

I DO make good references, and then the Bad Guys delete them, ANYWAY.

There seems to be no rule that makes a good reference keep an item. Bad people, and they DO exist in Wiki, (some) will delete or revert, regardless of the references quoted. This makes them vandals.


" Wickipedia, where the Vandals are in charge". -- Jon-Erik Beckjord

beckjordBeckjord 05:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RE.:Zoe

Will investigate. also go to Wikipedia:Administrators and click on "List of Administrators". Martial Law 23:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This individual is not listed as one, so it is likely this individual is not a Admin @ all. Martial Law 23:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe is #616 (heh) on the Active admins list.

I have seen the list. Must be a recent addition. Martial Law 04:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bigfoot info....

In 1996, in the form of what is known as the "Daily Activity Report", an internal National Park Service report that is not in any way confidential, but is not circulated through the newspapers...a report was filed by employees and visitors of an apparent sighting. The creature was witnessed by no less than 7 individuals and it ocurred in Idaho, I believe near Nez Perce National Historical Park. One of the witnesses was a wildlife biologist apparently. It may have made the press. I saw the report as I am a former employee of ther National Park Service and was stationed in Grand Teton at the time. It might be worth your while to seek this report out.

I am curious why the Bigfoot article doesn't go into the issue of sustainability of population. I know that mountain lions exist in large part due to sightings which are about 50 times more frequent than Bigfoot sightings. But few people ever see a mountain lion because they are predominantly nocturnal and they have tremendous vision, hearing and can smell people long before they get near. I have seen 3 mountain lions in my lifetime of working for the NPS and growing up in Montana. Reports by the NPS estimates at least 300 mountain lions in the Yellowstone ecosystem...a region of almost 20 million acres. The NPS maintains that if the population were to drop below 70, it would have limited chances of maintaining themselves due to possible inbreeding, and related issues...just finding a mate would be difficult at times. As with most higher mammals, the mountain lion does not produce a signicant number of offspring. Most primates (of which Bigfoot is supposedly one) produce few offspring and do not reproduce every year. Now forgive me for not providing all the necessary external linking for this argument, but how many bigfoots do you estimate exist, and is this number a sufficient number to maintain themselves?--MONGO 03:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Mongo for report

Bigfoot creatures cannot sustain themselves on a normal biological system. They __would need__ 16,000 calories a day and this cannot be obtained from the habitat, and they would leave huge piles of poop, and lots of it, and they do not.

Hence, they are outside the normal system.

Now go to the Bigfoot page, which is beset by die-hard skeptix, and revert to my last good version. Delete their biased and stupid junk. If I do it too much, I violate the 3RRR rule.

beckjordBeckjord 05:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I advise you do a read on no original research and verifiability. You can't just upload info that is not cited by reputable sources.--MONGO 09:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

You know that I will not lie to you.

Call off this Edit war @ once before things REALLY get out of hand. I have seen what happens in these wars. They're not beutiful at all. This will only cause massive disruptions on Wikipedia, and once Jimbo Wales sees your declaration of war( Its posted all over the place, like a 1,000' billboard), he will remove you. I'm imploring you to call off this war. There are ways of resolving these disputes. Call this war off, and I'll see what I can find on the Bigfoot websites. Martial Law 04:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

declaration of war is removed

I love everybody. Let there be peace. Zoe, DreamGuy, Cyde, DanielCD. Martial Law.


beckjordBeckjord 05:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good Faith Gesture

Here are 2 websites and data sites that you may find useful. What is your opinion of these ?



More to follow IF and when this war is called off, and there is no more mess of this nature. This is evidence of the Interdimensional Bigfoot that is independent evidence, not on your site, yet agree with you. Martial Law 05:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Same applies to anything that can disrupt Wikipedia. As stated, I will NOT lie to you.

If something disrupts Wiki policies, I will let you know. My User page has a list of Wikipedia resources on it. It would be a good idea to use them. I have not lied to you, I will not lie to you now either. Martial Law 06:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance to the above, see WP:V. You say these things are interdimensional, Wikipedia wants you to verify your info.


No,no,no

I never said they *are* interdimensional. I said this is a Bold textTHEORY. Ae wiki people st*pid? Ever hear of the word "maybe" ? I said Bigfoot might be interdimensional, and we Bold textdo have a possible form of proof. Now Zoe, Cyde, DreamGuy and othres, read this. Bonk!

beckjordBeckjord 06:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

edit war?

there is no war. I will simply win and delete BAD info, lies, or I will leave,and if so, reveal truth about certain people ....to the outside world, which DOES exist outside of wiki.

beckjordBeckjord 06:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Use @ least 4 or 6 other websites, data sites, such as these two given here. Martial Law 06:19, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bitter Pills, Urrp

This is a bitter pill to swallow: Leave out your website - for now - out of the Bigfoot article. Martial Law 06:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Had to take one the size of Bigfoot myself. Martial Law 06:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Have another one: You have to remove your war declaration OFF of all of the Wiki pages, or someone may get the wrong idea, and I've seen where that leads. Martial Law 06:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

things going on we are not told of

what is going on?

What pill?

beckjordBeckjord 06:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

War ?

You'll have to remove your war declaration off of your website. If a bunch of skeptics see this and "go to war" on Wikipedia, guess who gets the blame. Seen this happen before on other places. Martial Law 07:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the bad guys rule Wiki.

I am not declaring war on wiki. I am simply against deliberately false and lying info.

The skeptics? They are already here. Wikians.

beckjordBeckjord 07:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Block

When I warn you not to engage in personal attacks, you are not permitted to respond with a personal attack (in the form of vandalism and politically-motivated threats & insults). You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours. You may edit this talk page if you can keep it civil. El_C 07:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Customizing User page

As long it is NOT offensive, vindictive,indecent, obscene, inflamatory( rants, attacks, that sort of thing),profane at all - in a nutshell -IF there is nothing in the slightest that can offend anyone at all on your User page, you can customize it. To be on the SAFE side, I'd contact a Admin. once the 48 hr. block has expired, about this matter. As for the article Bigfoot itself, I'll keep a eye on it. Martial Law 08:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just got the news of this block. I was examining your question about your User page. Martial Law 08:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You'll be back on 1-1-06, or 1-2-06. Martial Law 08:55, 29 December 2005

The unfairness continues

there are 1000 ways to p*ss someone off in Wiki.

beckjordBeckjord 18:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Google Search: Erick Beckjord

Google Search Results on subject: User:Beckjord:19,000

Some support him, some oppose him. Martial Law 09:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mongo

Mongo, all my sources are reputable. Bigfoot and the paranormal have very little journal entries, so we must rely on websites and Wiki IS a website, and newsletters, personal letters as are OK in journal citations (I've seen them listed). Attn Zoe, Cyde,DanielCD.

WIKIANS AFTER FAIR EDITING

WAFE is now forming, to assist newbies in getting important edits into pages that will stick.

Contact me if you want to join.

beckjordBeckjord 18:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ombudsman

is there for for Wiki?

beckjordBeckjord 18:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe

Be aware please that learning all the ins and outs of Wiki, is a formiddable task.

Takes hours, and one soon forgets.

Few have the time nor dedication to do it. Also many of the rules are unpleasant and against common sense for a web-based pedia. This is not print, it is online.

I ask you, and others to join Wikians After Fair Edits, WAFE, and please assist me and others to insert legit edits that correct grossly wrong text in articles. Such as black is white, left is right,, down is up, etc.

Also DanielCD.

I note that edits tend to stick if an admin does it. We need your help.

Happy New Year to all,

beckjordBeckjord 18:56, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Martial Law

can you find out how many hits a day go to various pages? Such as Bigfoot, Nessie, CZ, UFOs, Crop Circles and my name page. ????

Please help.

beckjordBeckjord 18:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know that one: it's not possible, unfortunately. Bishonen | talk 20:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Proper way to list a reference for a change

How is it done? In text of change? In the notes block? Is this read BEFORE someone hits revert? Are they ALLOWED to revert a legit referenced change?

beckjordBeckjord 19:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DanielCD

can you edit the word "coarse" personality out of the Beckjord article and put in "aggressive"?

That is more accurate. The former is insulting and not appropriate for Wikipedia.

Thanks

beckjordBeckjord 19:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've changed it. Bishonen | talk 20:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

?!

You know a Mr. Krantz ? He is the one who told people to shoot at Bigfoot. Found other websites and data sites that tell of people shooting at this thing, and in one case blood has been found after someone shot one. Do a Google search on these:

  • Killing Bigfoot/Bigfoot
  • Shooting Bigfoot/Bigfoot

I've done this myself, and found this other guy who says people should shoot these things, as well as websites reporting people shooting at these things. Martial Law 23:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beckjord&oldid=33180690"