User talk:Cjcollier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cjcollier (talk | contribs) at 23:00, 20 December 2005 (thanks. and indenting.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

FearÉIREANN: Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. FearÉIREANN\(caint)


cj:

Can you describe "advertisement"?
Are you referring to the creation of Bloggers_for_Peace and listing it as a better way to bring peace than by vandalising the George W. Bush wiki page? I do not see this as advertisement. I have also mentioned general Activism. If you wish to remove Blogers for Peace, please leave the link to Activism. It will likely greatly reduce vandalism of the George W. Bush wiki entry.

FearÉIREANN: Adding in links promoting links pushing an agenda is not the way to deal with vandalism. Your Bloggers for Peace has already been nominated for speedy deletion. Please stop using WP to push any political agenda. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 21:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

C.J.:

If this is the decision of the WM board, I agree with it. However, I believe that having such a wiki entry will reduce the vandalism done to the George W. Bush page and encourage a more healthy discussion.

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Never remove a deletion vote page from an article. It is seen as serious misbehaviour. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 22:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

C.J.:

My apologies. I did not intend to remove a deletion vote. What is it and when did I delete it? I'm somewhat new to Wikipedia content creation.
Please clarify your above comment: Adding in links promoting links pushing an agenda


Never:

Any deletion box that generates a vote has to remain in location until a decision is taken. If you see {some text} never delete it unless you know what it is and are deleting it for a reason (for example, an outdated link, etc). It was because I suspected it may have been an innocent error that I did not enforce the final notice warning and place a block. Just be careful.
BTW I don't doubt your sincerity but we cannot have a page like that as a list. As an encyclopaedia we have to follow certain standards of neutrality. You and I may both be anti-war, but we cannot use WP to promote that agenda. But links like that can be put on your user page. Blogs by their nature aren't neutral sources but personal opinions and cannot be used as links and references on WP. Slán FearÉIREANN\(caint) 22:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

cj:

Thank you for the clarification and for your understanding. I will move personal opinion content activism to my user page.