Russell Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Imran (talk | contribs) at 12:44, 2 March 2004. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Russell Group of Universities is a self-selected group of large research-led British universities; 18 of its 19 members are in the top 20 in terms of research funding. The group is often presented in the media as a kind of British Ivy League, representing the interests of Britain's prestigious universities. However, unlike the Ivy League, all of the Russell Group universities are state-funded. The confusion of 'large' with 'prestigious' has also sometimes led to assumptions that some smaller universities, such as York, Durham and St Andrews are members, when they are not.

The group's purpose is to represent the views of their institutions (especially in lobbying government and parliament) and to commission reports to support their case. Their concerns are to lead the UK's research effort; to maximise income; to attract the best staff and students; to reduce government interference; and to exploit their collaborative advantage.

Although not directly related to it's purpose, the Russell Group is often taken in studies to be representative of prestigous universities. An example of this is the study done by the Centre for the Economics of Education that found that graduates from Russell Group universities earn more on average than those from other universities.

The group has been prominent in recent years in the debate over the introduction of tuition fees, a measure which it has strongly supported - much to the dismay of the universities' Students' Unions. Indeed, members of the group argued that even the fees proposed by the contraversial Higher Education Bill would not be enough, and argued for the right to charge much higher so-called top-up fees. In response to this and other issues, the Student Unions of the Russell Group universities have formed the Aldwych Group.


The Russel group is so named because meetings take place at the Russell Hotel in Russell Square, London, generally shortly before Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals (CVCP) meetings in Tavistock Square. The group is chaired by Professor Michael Sterling, the Vice-Chancellor of Birmingham.


In terms of total research funding in 1998/9, the top 17 are Russell Group institutions. Cardiff comes in 19th, with non-Russell Group institutions Leicester in 18th and Queen Mary in 20th, Overall, the Russell Group had over 60% of the total research income of HE institutions in the UK. From the examples above, York comes in 24th, Durham 28th, and St Andrews 36th. LSE - which, though very elite, is very much out of place in the Russell Group in terms of its size - is down in 37th with less than half the research income of Cardiff, and the only Russell Group member not to make the top 20. However LSE does no science, technology and medicine, and in its area of social science receives the most research income of any social science institution. In the government ratings it is usually ranked in the top two or three for quality. However the gap between the largest and smallest institutions in the Russell Group is huge. The so-called 'Golden Triangle' of institutions (Oxford, Cambridge, UCL, and Imperial College - the London institutions of UCL and Imperial forming a single point on the triangle) have 40% of the research income of the Russell Group, while Cardiff has less than a quarter of the income of fourth-placed Cambridge.


The figures depend on factors other than solely quality, especially institutional size and subject spread (i.e. science, technology and medicine tend to attract more money).


More recently a sub group of 'super-elite' universities, with strong international standing, has emerged within the Russell constellation: the 'G5', comprising LSE, Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial and UCL. These, according to press reports, have begun to make separate representations to government in search of additional funding, and for instance the vice-chancellors of these institutions sent a celebrated letter to the Times, in late 2003, on the subject of university finance.


The members

See also