User:ClueBot/FalsePositives

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Od Mishehu (talk | contribs) at 10:23, 28 October 2008 (→‎False positive move: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is where false positives should be reported.
Reports not following these instructions will be deleted.

To report a false positive:
You need to get ClueBot's revert ID, there are two ways to do this:
From the article:
Click the history tab at the top of the article.
The revert ID is in parenthesis right after "Thanks, User:ClueBot".
From your talk page:
Click the "edit this page" tab at the top of the page.
The revert ID is in the text right after "MySQL ID:".
Now, click here and put the revert ID in the box when prompted.

False positives

I reported at false positive, reverting User:Chriszwolle (and placing a warning on user talk page) at Andorra. The report doesn't seem to have registered. __meco (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Evan List of Pacifc Hurriucanes

This was a false statement if you look at List of Atlantic hurricanes.--Yellow Evan (talk) 23:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Language Purification

Hi,

this was a false positive. I cant find a report on the talk page of the user, so I'll do it this way. effeietsanders 18:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion of multiple attestation

Hello,

I would like to report that revert 350003 is a false positive. I suspect that this accusation is being inappropriately assigned to all users of my school's LAN. I performed no such edits on any of the aforementioned subject, nor do I have any idea as to why these messages are showing up on my account. I would suggest the usage of unique tracking cookies to help differentiate IP's from the same network and to screen out ID hackers/clones.

Carl-Gorn (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Carl-Gorn[reply]

PIM

[1] does not appear to be vandalism in any possible sense. Could you explain to me whaty you marked it as such. Reply on my talk page, please 07:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC).

[2] Not exactly a false positive, it is a failure to revert far enough and consequently reverting to alternate vandalism. Revert ID: 315718. SpinningSpark 10:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

False positive move

The move of United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) (493805) see here seems to be a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:23, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]