User talk:Helixweb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Littlealien182 (talk | contribs) at 00:13, 20 October 2008 (→‎Aaron Gillespie: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

santa rita jail rules

whats edit warring ? Sickero (talk) 09:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sickero, edit warring is what you and 74.228.158.68 were doing, reverting each other's edits repeatedly without discussing on the talk page or working towards consensus. If you guys both do that, the article suffers and consensus is never reached. In regards to the santa rita rules, if you have a source for it, I would definitely recommend putting it in, but I would summarize it, instead of just pasting the whole thing into the article. Thanks and please let me know if you have any other questions.Helixweb (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, i didn't know it had a name. Sickero (talk) 11:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance

Thanks for the quick overview. Regards, Rudget. 11:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xlibris (2nd nomination)

The page on Xlibris has been totally rewritten. You might want to reconsider your !vote here, especially given that I've withdrawn. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 18:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, the article looks better.Helixweb (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Did you email me about the Maria auxiliadora article? Tan | 39 05:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, not me, sorry. Didn't even know you could email editors off-wikipedia?Helixweb (talk) 03:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the toolbox box on the left panel of your wikipedia browser window, when looking at a user page or a user talk page, there should be link for 'E-mail this user' if that user has e-mail enabled. Narson (talk) 12:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.Helixweb (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ronan O'Rahilly and Condom edits (objections)

Dear Helixweb, I have responded to your objections on my My Talk page. I would greatly appreciate if you would consider them and respond.

Aimulti (talk) 09:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response, but I believe the consensus is that most of what you have contributed is faulty information sourced from old or inaccurate or unsubstantial sources. I do like your edits on Soho, however. Helixweb (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Gillespie

Can you please explain your rationale? I'm not sure how this article qualifies as "blatant advertising." — ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 00:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]