Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot

Bot controls:

• HBC NameWatcherBot: Control panel - Whitelist - Blacklist

Bot-reported

• AdminDice (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

• Matches the literal pattern admin.

• The string admin has a comment associated with it: Name may imply a position of authority HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 23:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
• Being discussed with the user. Note: This user has requested a change of username after being notified by User:NuclearWarfare about the username problem. Please hold off blocking until the CHU request has been processed. Is he back? (talk) 00:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

• Lesstalker (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

• Matches the literal pattern stalker.

• The string stalker is prone to false positives, please take extra care ensuring this name is actually a violation before blocking. HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 03:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

• Could be false positive ("less talker") or disruptive ("Les stalker," "les(bian) stalker" and so on). Gwen Gale (talk) 09:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

So then, let's ...

Wait until the user edits. Daniel Case (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

• Krystalkkk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

• This user has edited at least one time.
• Matches the literal pattern kkk.

• This report was delayed until the user edited.
• The string kkk is prone to false positives, please take extra care ensuring this name is actually a violation before blocking. HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Being discussed with the user. Blueboy96 05:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

• This does not look like a vio' to me, I would not have made the kkk connection if it had not been pointed out and I doubt that is the intention. Based on the users first edits it is very clearly a sock and would bear watching but the username is not disruptive IMHO. Icewedge (talk) 07:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
• Following an Internet search I think this is likely a false positive. Could easily be an alternate account though. Gwen Gale (talk) 08:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)