User talk:Bart133

Archive 1

Archive 2

Mrs Claus

Heya, a word of advice: Stuff like Mrs. Claus doesn't need to go through vfd. Just put a {{del}} or a {{db|Deletion reason here}} on it and it'll get speedy deleted without all the hassle of a VfD. --fvw* 17:01, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)

Fixing duplicate words

Hi, I notice you've been fixing up a bunch of articles with duplicate words. I assume you've been finding these from User:R3m0t/Reports? If so, please could you remove the entries from the lists when you've done them? I've just tried to fix quite a few entries from User:R3m0t/Reports/and only to find they've already been done! Which is great, but if you could mark them off as done it would save others wasting time looking for the errors... thanks! munt fish 12:06, 2005 Feb 9 (UTC)

Re:1000 edits

According to the standards for Adminship, a user must have made at least 1000 edits. Each time you click the 'save page' bar at the bottom of the edit window counts as an edit. When you have clicked that bar 1000 times, you meet one standard of qualification for adminship. →Iñgōlemo← ^talk donate 06:49, 2005 Feb 13 (UTC)

New policy

A policy idea, called Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship, has recently been proposed. The straw poll shows that people are against it 2-to-1, but it has come under fire because most of those polled in the oppose section are admins. Care to vote? →Iñgōlemo← ^talk 19:30, 2005 Mar 25 (UTC)

Curonian language reference?

I have read for years that Curonian was not only long-extinct, but poorly attested. Is there any reference you could add to the article about the surviving community you have mentioned? --Theodore Kloba 14:57, August 3, 2005 (UTC) Sorry, wrong user talk. --Theodore Kloba 20:59, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

RfA thank you

Bart133, I wish to say thanks for your support in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 82 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to your expectations. I would especially like to thank Rlevse for nominating me and Wizardman for co-nominating me.
                                                  — JGHowes ^talk - 19 August 2008

Recent edit

Spider-man's grand daughter's name in the Old Man Logan Storyline is Spider-bitch, not Spider-girl. Continuing to post it as Spider-girl is giving false information. Read the series, or I'll scan it and post the scanned pages. It's not vandalism, because I'm correcting it. I don't like the name any more than you may, but we don't have the right to censor it. We didn't name the charecter.

Here's a quote from an interview with the writer referencing the charecter.

NRAMA: Who else will we be seeing in this story?

MM: Only a few Marvel Heroes are still alive and the story mainly focuses on their descendants. There's a new Kingpin for example and Spiderman's granddaughter, Spider-bitch, is a favorite but the characters I'm most excited about are the radiation sick sons and grandsons of the Hulk - and inbred, ugly, incestuous team of supervillains with a nod to The Hills Have Eyes.

http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=144471

Thanks/Huggle

Thanks for cleaning up my pages after that vandal and getting him blocked. I see you use Huggle: I have been thinking about trying it, but there is a lurid notice on its page at the moment saying "MEDIAWIKI CHANGES/BUGS HAVE BROKEN HUGGLE USE SOMETHING ELSE THANKS" - do you know that's about? Does it still work OK for you? The talk page doesn't shed much light, except that Gurch is trying to fix it. JohnCD (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks. I'm already "unified" so maybe I'll try it. JohnCD (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I think I figured it out...

With your messages on my talk page, I believe you mean to say "I AM AN ESTABLISHED USER, HENCE, MY TRANSLATION OF THE NPOV IS CORRECT, YOURS IS WRONG. HAVE A NICE DAY." By refusing to respond on the Armageddon talk page, I have more than casually assumed you have given up and admitted that Catholocism is just as much based on myths as every other religion. Just to note, I have my stopwatch running to see how long it takes you to remove this message. Have a nice day living in your own little world (and a question, in all honesty, how do you make so many edits in such a short period of time?) 129.3.173.156 (talk) 17:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I make so many edits so quickly because I use an automated tool for reverting vandalism. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 17:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, you answered that question, congratulations. Do you care to answer the remaining one on the Armageddon talk page? 129.3.173.156 (talk) 17:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I guess not. It is plain and obvious to me that you are not too particually fond of being told that you are wrong, and only having one argument to (fail) to stick to. Catholocism, just like every other religion, relies on myths, hence, I will be re-adding "myth" to the armageddon article. If you wish to continue pushing your POV that a belief makes it right, see you at the talk page. 129.3.173.156 (talk) 17:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello Bart, and hello IP. Unless there is some angle that I'm unaware of, I don't think either of your edits are 3 revert rule exempt. I've protected the page, because of your edit war. Stating the obvious, I'm not in any way endorsing the protected version. PhilKnight (talk) 17:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

This guy is a super cool internet tough guy

PEOPLE WITH NUMBERS AFTER THEIR NAME ARE UNORIGINAL AND HAVE MENTAL SHORT COMMINGS.