User talk:SuperDude115

Here are some old talk archives for SD115: User:SuperDude115/talk archive 1

Post discussion below this line:

Just a heads up that I responded to your comment at User talk:Bryan Derksen#reply about parent categories. You can delete this message when you see it. Bryan 23:41, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Category

Please do not knowingly create duplicate categories. If you have a problem with the size of Category:Controversial computer and video games, you should attempt to nominate it to be renamed at WP:CFD, although I can tell you for this specific one, you won't get much backing since spelling out "computer and video games" is a current format of numerous subcategories in the Category:Computer and video games hierarchy. K1Bond007 22:25, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

It doesn't appear so from the message you left on the category, but whatever. K1Bond007 00:46, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

hi

can you please help me on my Lisa Kushell article. I thiink you are super cool thanks.Wiki brah 05:20, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks...

Thanks for your help on the Lisa Kushell article. By the way do you think a template like this would help on it: Template:Hot_Jewish_Actress-stub. Do you think it should be on there? Wiki brah 08:26, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

List of eponymous albums (songwise)

Hiya. I stumbled across this article you just created when viewing recent changes this morning, but didn't have the time to do anything with it. Is this list really necessary? When you think about it, most albums have an eponymous song on it - from my own Winamp collection, 29 out of 52 (excluding collections) have an eponymous song. And when you consider the amount of albums there is, the list is going to be absolutely unmaintainable, not to mention that I don't think it brings together albums with anything in common apart from this. Sam Vimes 22:08, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Add to that the list of sports teams/automobile link thing. SD, please stop pulling these random associations out of your head. They are causing a huge drain on this site's editors and resources, OK? Your old pal, Lucky 6.9 07:27, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

You don't understand, SD. The odds are that no one will come here searching for such a list, let alone under the title you've given this. Please. You cannot use this as a sort of text dump for whatever idea pops into your mind. I repeat: No one will come here searching for information like this. I know you mean well, but this is a waste of time and resources. This is not Google, nor is it a dumping ground for every possible combination of ideas on the planet. Please do me a favor. Think of a subject you like and see if there's an article. Then, see if there's a way to improve it. If something truly notable is not represented, write something about it. I was shocked to discover a red link at Academy of Model Aeronautics just the other day. Now, we have an article of potential use to thousands of people. See what I mean? In fact, go to my user page. There are links to all of my original articles on it, including three which were brought to featured status. Almost all of those articles have thrived and grown because they are of general interest to lots of people. Take a look through them to see what I mean. - Lucky 6.9 19:51, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Detachable what?!?

Hi, SD! I gotta tell you...that title threw me for a loop. When I saw what it was really about, I couldn't help laughing. Very, very good work. Excellent song stub! Keep up the good edits!! - Lucky 6.9 04:11, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Re:Willy on Wheels/Whilly on Weels

No, I am not claiming to be Willy on Wheels. To the contrary, I stated that the user account User:Whilly on Weels has nothing to do with this vandal; I registered it just for fun. - Mike Rosoft 21:37, 5 September 2005 (UTC)