Wikipedia:Peer review/2005 WWE Draft/archive1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
{{subst:PR/arcive}} I've listed this article for peer review because I think this article has FL potential, and I would like it to be reviewed for any concerns or problems, so it can have a better chance at WP:FLC.
Thanks, SRX 16:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Nikki
- For the Draft Lottery, it might be a good idea to subdivide the Notes into Date, Show, Location, and Notes.
- I like the idea of an infobox. Maybe with information like total number of trades, date it started, date finished, and links to the previous and following year's trades (like the PPVs in the PPV infobox). Those are just random examples, but you get the idea. What do you think?
- In the lead: announcers and commentators shouldn't be cap; June shouldn't be linked; the "-" in June 6-30 should be changed to a "–"
- Background: don't start a sentence with however, don't link June; the draft is written as Draft Lottery and draft lottery (should it be cap or not? be consistent)
- All the dates in the table with day/month/year should be linked, even if they are already. That way if someone changes the order with the sort function, the top date is still linked.
Hope that helps! Nikki311 23:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)