Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego-Prosthesis

Lego-Prosthesis

Very close to patent nonsense, but perhaps not quite there yet. Tupsharru 21:54, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Does not seem to be verifiable. I have found some references to working models of human hands made out of Lego, but no indication that they are seriously considered as prosthesis. ManoaChild 23:23, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, but BJADON the talk page "These facts are facts about actual facts." Robert A West 23:31, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax, there is no such thing as a prosthesis made out of legos and certainly Vietnam Vets aren't getting ones that say "What are you looking at? Wanna fight?" Xaa 23:42, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Trying to think of a reason this can be speedied, as it's downright stupid to keep stuff like this for 5 days, but alas, I fear we must. Delete. -R. fiend 23:58, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Oh, and before anyone votes to BJAODN this, please keep in mind that at least one admin does not count such votes as deletes, so if even 25% of the votes are BJAODN, the article could fail to meet consensus and be kept. -R. fiend 00:00, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nonsense. --Etacar11 01:22, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It's nowhere near funny. -Splash 01:33, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. As a veteran of both Franco-Prussian wars, who relies on his Lego knees, I encourage this page's continuation. -FranzJoseph 01:33, 5 August 2005 (UTC) (Vote actually by 68.48.216.25 (talk · contribs))
• Keep. It's a keeper. BJADON!!! (Unsigned vote by 207.237.204.113 (talk · contribs), first edit)
• Keep.First off how would someone from the University of Bristol even know what funny is? I vote we speedily delete Senior Splahes Vote For Deletion. Plese see article---> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splash%27s_Vote_for_Deletion_on_the_Article_Lego-Prosthesis (Unsigned vote by 151.201.136.93 (talk · contribs))
• BAJDON this except for the Lego hand bit at the end which appears legitimate so Merge that with the main Lego article. 23skidoo 04:22, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
  • You understand that such a move will result in keeping this article as a redirect, per the rules of the GFDL? Also, if you plan to vote BJAODN, we have recently learnt that it is necessary to be explicit and indicate whether you mean "keep and copy to BJAODN" or "delete and copy to BJAODN". -Splash 04:39, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• delete and immediately not really funny. The fact that someone involved has been deleting votes on this page and adding anonymous votes pretty much proves that it isn't legitimate. should have a wikipedia page Don't Feed the Trolls. delete quick.--Darkfred 14:37, 5 August 2005 (UTC)