User talk:Sennen goroshi

To the alleged English teacher

• I'm not upset at you, it is very nice of you to struggle and try so hard with your English, so that you can get your point across. I really couldn't care what you say about whales, and I am still very curious as to why you are so interested in my origin, why is it so important for you to have to guess that I am Japanese/American? Why do you care, and what do you deduce about me, from the guess that I'm Japanese/American? Sennen goroshi 17:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Haha, you think your English is so good or way better than me? I paste the evident of what your "real" ability is. I already figured out your origin not only by your nickname but also by your English.

I am not neither agreeing that there is anti-Korean sentiment in Japan, neither am I denying it.

What a proud comment you made to attack me with your so called "good" English. There is no correct grammar in the above sentence. You should've written just "neither" or "not either" instead of "not neither" in the first passage. Moreover, "neither am I denying" in the latter passage should be replaced with "nor denying". The sentence show the wrong usages of inversion in English.

I have had a hard time to figure out what you try to say, so if you want to spare your dignity, behave yourself. FYI, I've got a perfect score in the reading section whenever I test TOEFL. Besides, do you have any qualification to teach English? If you really want so, study English so hard and get a license in advance. Of course at least bachelor degree majoring in English at a "good school" is required first. But judging by your writing, you seem to have nothing to do with it. If you dare to keep insulting me with your scorning comments, try me. --Appletrees 00:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Qualified?

please don't compare my English to yours...don't even start to comment on my English until you at least have the ability to converse, without making the readers head explode, whilst trying to understand your English. I made one minor grammatical error on a talk page. You are unable to write a single sentence without numerous glaring errors. Regarding my qualifications to comment on your English, I have a BA in English from a university in a native English speaking country. I have experience teaching experience in government schools, and have also taught PHD level scientists how to construct a scientific paper in English, I think I am more than qualified to comment on your level of English, when you are using English in English wikipedia.Sennen goroshi 06:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

You're the more qualified person on English than me? Who judges that? You with making major mistake? I only mentioned your flaws among the bunch you've made. That are not the minor mistakes. Even 5th grade students in Korea know that grammar. Somehow, I try to understand your struggles and excuses via the fact that Japanese get the lowest score on TOEFL exam in Asia. If you really were an English teacher, I concern about the future of your students. You're certainly not teaching English to native people, so "small mistakes" can possibly be understood. Besides the Ph.D students(candidates are more accurate) of yours doesn't mean that you have the degree.

Don't forget that you started insulting me with intention. You are full of yourself so never guess that I already figured out your origin from your "so-called qualified English" in my talk page. You are the first one to dare abjectly mocking me on the matter unlike "real" native English speakers. When I miss some word in my writing, they understand me fine unlike you unable to catch anything. That induces that you're not an English teacher at all.

If you don't have any plausible logics to persuade your opponents, don't take a wrong way to content your overrated self-esteem. I've seen the interesting comments by your visitors tell that what kind of people you are. And NOW, YOU ERASED A PILE OF BAD COMMNETS BY OTHERS, You haven't said any racist comment against me and any others? Oh, why did you apology to the user mad at you? And also why did your visitor pointed out that your comments are very offensive and have a racist viewpoint? Aside from "cute puppy meat", you scorned the great men of Korea praised by not only Korean but also outside world as "the unimportant Korean" comparing with Adolf Hitler. Sadly, historians and publics except Japan consider that the crimes done by Aolf Hitler is the very same as Hirohito. What a pity, you're digging your grave. I already informed you that I would follow the same way as did the other. I am just imitating your steps so if you want to blame, blame yourself. --Appletrees 18:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Your pathetic personality

I can' tolerate your impudence any more. You keep insulting me with your dirty mean tongue. Stupid? I think you can't see any context in my comments. You are the meanest and pathetic person in the world I've encountered in my life. I pity you. If you have graduated from any university in the US (I highly doubt you even graduated any college anywhere, because educated men can't be shallow just like you!), you would be required to take several humanistic and social science classes. Did you ever take any class in which Japanese war crimes would be understood among the international society? haha, even students from Japan said they felt shame of their ancestors because they didn't know and just learned with hugely edited textbooks. But you keep denying your origin and then that's making to look you stupid. You might be a Japanese-somewhere citizen. So what? You've produced offensive destructions on Korean-related articles and overly defended cruel Japanese war crime. In addition, you don't have any plausible arguments, then you choose to attack me with personal abuse that shows your true nature. Your English have been not near eloquence but close silliness and shallowness. So dream on! --Appletrees 09:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages

Hello, disambiguation pages exist solely to link to several Wikipedia articles, usually when a user searches for an ambiguous term. They should not contain encyclopedic content or dictionary definitions – see MoS:D for more info. If you want to add an article on "shart" the term, please do so at Shart (slang) and add a link to it from the disambiguation page, but please note that an article on shart has been deleted on multiple occasions for failing Wikipedia's guidelines regarding articles on neologisms (see WP:NEO). --Muchness 05:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

give me your personal opinion, is an article with citations and written in a mature manner, about shart, ever going to remain without being deleted? or will i just waste my time if i make it?Sennen goroshi 05:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

To avoid deletion, the article must cite reliable sources and must be encyclopedic, not just a dictionary definition. My personal opinion is that at this time an article on the term will be deleted, because there are not currently sufficient reliable sources, and the term is not currently in sufficiently widespread usage. I don't feel that the source you provided, [1], is by itself sufficient to establish the term's notability per WP:NEO. If you're concerned that an article on this term may be deleted, you can create a draft article in your personal sandbox and work on it with other interested editors. Also bear in mind that as the term gains popularity and more widespread usage, it may at some future point become sufficiently notable to warrant a Wikipedia article or a Wiktionary definition. --Muchness 05:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Your/one's

Like the use of most contractions, "your" (second person) really is considered amateurish/childish in scholarly writing contexts. Don't just take my word for it, though; you might ask around as well if you'd like to make sure of this. I'm not British and don't use British writing conventions, but it's this way in any English-language writing. Badagnani 06:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

48 hour block for edit-warring/3RR violation on Korean cuisine‎

Also, you may think you're being funny with comments like the one you made on the Talk:Rape page. I strongly urge you to rethink this, as this is not a place for silly nonsense. SirFozzie 17:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

hmmmmm does this mean I might be able to be a decent boyfriend for 48hrs, giving my girly some attention instead of editing pages on wikipedia? I feel for the users of wikipedia who will be deprived of my sharp wit, insight and skillful debating skills for 48 long long hours.Sennen goroshi 18:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Since you've promised not to edit war in the future, and cut out the "funny comments", I'll drop it to 24 hours, from now. SirFozzie 18:25, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

thanks. silly comments are easy to cut out, and regarding edit wars, I shall make my points with single edits and then discussion. it was nice for you to reply, i appreciated it. :)Sennen goroshi 18:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Your edit choices are atrocious and the worse POV editing I've ever come across on both the pro-Korean, pro-Japanese sides. While I appreciate and agree with your sentiments of trying to meet on middle ground, I look forward to seeing your future edits bear this out.melonbarmonster 04:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

To be honest, the choices were thought out and deliberate and I see nothing wrong in that. I made sense to me, because its obvious that these articles are going to be where the POV from both sides are. While I might admit that some of my edits were designed with the intention to piss people off, or at least with the knowledge that they will piss people off, a lot my edits seemed fair to me. For example someone with a pro-Korean POV might see my edits on the Korean-cuisine article as a way of insulting Koreans, someone with a pro-animal rights POV would see the edits of others, as a way of hiding the fact that there are some pretty nasty things going on re. dog-meat. The same with many other articles, articles that name someone as a Japanese racist, seem fair if you are Korean, however to me they seem a little too widespread - for example there seem to be less negative categories on Hitler's page, than on the pages of many Japanese. But whatever, I'm sure if people try, we might have a little more peace in wikipedia - but I'm also sure that stubborn people with a POV and an intention to piss people off will remain. Lets wait and see, if this improves 1%, then it will be a good thing.Sennen goroshi 04:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)