User talk:Smuschiano215

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scientizzle (talk | contribs) at 16:11, 27 September 2007 (Reply: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hello Smuschiano215! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! YechielMan 20:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Creating non-existent articles and Capitalization

What you have now done in the article Environmental engineering law by the reverting the changes I made to Wikify the article is create a great number of non-existent articles, as for example Baseline Survey and Building Revaluation. That's why they are displayed in red. Existing articles like Environmental engineering law are displayed in blue. Unless you intend to create all those red, non-existent articles yourself ... it will be years before they are all created by others.

Also, Wiki policy is to only capitalize the first letter of an article, as for example in the Environmental engineering law article unless it is a proper name such U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. For another example, your Soil Contamination displays as red because it is non-existent but Soil contamination is blue because it already exists. The same policy applies to using excess capitalization in the text of an article.

I am not going to revert your incorrect usage again. I strongly urge you to study other Wikipedia articles as well as the Wikipedia editing tutorials and you will see that your are not following Wikipedia policy. Sooner or later an Administrator will admonish you for not doing so. Why not accept some good advice before that happens? - mbeychok 00:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asbestos

It isn't necessary for this picture to be full size. It can be seen well as a thumb next to the text, like every other picture in the article.

This edit does not reflect a neutral point of view, that's why it was modified the first time. Please make sure your edits do not re-break the same thing that someone else just fixed. Every one of your edits I looked at re-broke something that someone else had fixed not long ago.-Xpanzion 07:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

A tag has been placed on Stephen R. Muschiano, MSCEE, JD, P.E. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. shoy 18:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Tags

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. shoy 19:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Shoyrudude555, you will be blocked from editing.  — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 19:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

Reply

Regarding your email...The "vandalism" you claim was done to the article was actually standard improvements and upkeep. Talk:Environmental engineering law explained a lot, did you see it? Your seeming unwillingness to work with others and your subsequent tissy fit wherein you vandalized various articles & user pages was rather unbecoming and justifiably earned you a block. You do not own content placed in Wikipedia. If you're so desperate for "acknowledgment" that you "creat[ed] the topic/profession", provide a reliable source that says so. — Scientizzle 16:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]