User talk:Bignole

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Want to learn how to properly archive? 10 March 2006 - 7 July 2006 10 July 2006 - 30 September 2006 1 October 2006 - 30 October 2006 31 October 2006 - 14 December 2006 15 December 2006 - 28 February 2007 24 February 2007 - 30 March 2007 1 April 2007 - 5 May 2007 6 May 2007 - 14 June 2007

I reserve the right to archive talk discussions at my leisure, but will make sure the discussions are closed before I do. Thank you. See also: Wikipedia:Talk_pages § Etiquette

Re

Yeah I saw your discussion with Maitch, anyway I tend not to use the ratings in my episode articles. For example my FA doesn't include them, and the same goes for some of my GAs. I don;t know what anyone else plans to do, but I won't be using them much, if at all again, but certainly not in an FA. Gran² 06:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Some Help

Know that the TV episode debate is over I would like to ask to know the what to type to specify that lack of nobility of a TV episode, because right now I am finding a lack of nobility with the episode pages of the current Ninja Turtles series due to both lack of plot summary on a lot of the pages and the creation of a very similar style of characters that are in the episode from the official TMNT website. If you go to those episode and look for an external link in that episode then you should know what I am talking about. -Adv193 19:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Charley Davidson

User:Mare-Silverus keeps moving this page to Charley Davidson (Biker Mice from Mars) when it's redundant, as there is only one character/person with this name. Could you please try to stop him? The Prince of Darkness 12:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Future film

There's a film called 'Repossession Mambo' that has all the criteria in place, but there doesn't seem to be any development history. Do you think it's appropriate to create a film article with one citation? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 03:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Bah, answer faster, will ya? :) I was waiting a while for your response and decided to go ahead and create it. Meh, Nottingham redux, huh? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 03:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Satisfied customers

Check this out. Congratulations. :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Careful 'bout 3RR. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 01:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Transformers

You are incorrect in stating that I am deleting information from this article. I am simply restroring the correct information to the article.

There is basis for the claim that Keith David is no longer voicing barricade. The only source for this claim is message board which is not reliable. IMDB and all the other outlets still list David as Barricade.

Had you bothered to actually investigate this instead of just automatically reverting me you would have found this out for yourself. annoynmous 01:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

So wait I'm confused, IMDB isn't reliable but a message board is. Wikipedia is also user contributed. I assumed that to make a claim one had to have hard evidence. IMDB is a much more reliable source than a Message board and if you ask me until it is confirmed, the more credible source should be shown. annoynmous 01:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

The source that is listed is not a website, it's a message board. If erik has a link to an official cast list than let him post it, but I don't we should just take his word for it that the cast list is right.

Yes IMDB makes errors, but as the release date for a film gets nearer those errors pretty much dissapear. Usually when the film gets out of the post-production phase you can pretty much assume that casting has been locked down.

I reiterate my point that IMDB is much more reliable than a message board which has no independent confirmation. Until some hard evidence comes along to contradict David being in the movie the article should list him as the voice of Barricade. User:annoynmous:annoynmous 01:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Where are the sources for this. You have not provided one bit of evidence to support your claims. As far as I know David has always been Barricade and was only until Alientraveller decided to change it based on some posting on a message board.

If your not going to head my concerns than I suggest that as a compromise the voice of Barricade be left blank until it is officially confirmed annoynmous 02:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Bumblebee does not talk.Stop being a fucking retard.HE DOES NOT TALK.EVERYBODY KNOWS BUT U.BAY EVEN SAID HIMSELF.

Will then dont say Mark is voiceing bb.Next time say that the songs in his radio r Mark

sorry i was lieing.But i know he does not talk cause in interviews,prequels and everything.He cant talk so put mark ryan as radio voice and not voice.besides its confusing cause u put he cant talk but mark is voice him.

u list your evedence that he does talk.Cause everywhere u look,not 1 source says he talks.everybody knows.also,it says on the toy specs

so u dont have a source?

1.where is your source.2.more than 4 people have sources on this link http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070622131739AALXpCG u r the only one who thinks otherwise

http://www.angelfire.com/wizard2/markryan/films.html that is mark ryans site.do u see transformers,NO U BEEPING DONT

u sourc is not releable either cause it a forum site

I swear, it's like he's drunk while wiki-editing. Anyway, this is an update about his actual involvement. So now it's basically needed to ensure that this is his official site. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry,I was wrong.I AM SOOOOOOOOO SORRY.

Casino Royale

Even you must be thinking the whole FA nomination has been too long now. Its a disaster ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 15:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Can't you see how the first nomination was a clear majority and even second time there appears to be more support than oppose. The whole thing was manipulated by Mr. featured article master himself who has the power to choose which articles he wants promoted or not. I thought we had "referencing problems" sorted? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 15:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Its a shame though. Anyway all the film articles are gradually getting better!!! Hope you are well ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 15:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I haven't checked the Bond articles for severla weeks as I am very busy with other tasks but they are starting to take shape. For me the weakest film article now is Diamonds Are Forever (film). ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 15:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I've now expanded Diamonds Are Forever (film). Later I'll try to add a full reaction/reception . Then it can all be copy edited and whatever at a later date -the info is there it just needs putting in proper order and re sentencing- I'm sure you'll agree it is looking better than earlier though ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 16:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Sopranos AFD

Well, the Afd got closed as "No consensus/keep" you mentioned going for the WP:CV if it wasn't closed as "Delete". Let me know if you need any help on it. The Filmaker 18:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

deleted scenes from Superman movies.

Yeah i could use some help from you not only recovering info on the deleted scenes from the Superman movies, but also i thought we can add them to the articles as well to make them as accurate as possible. Some of these deleted scenes dont seem to be mentioned such as the scene in Superman 4 where he visits the cemetary to see both parents graves.It's worth mentioning since these scenes are not included in the deleted scnes section of the delux edition.[1]

I dont know how to go aobut this but seeing your a good Superman contributer I think you're the best editor to consult.

Look forward to hearing from you on this.Regards-Vmrgrsergr 02:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

---

I agree with most of what you have said.No I am not discouraged as I think what you say is right.And yes adding minor/extra details is indeed unecnyclopediac.The reason i brought up un-mentioned scenes like the cemetary scene in Superman 4 is they were never shown in the DVD or theatrical release (btw i saw Superman 4 in the theatre in 1989 i think in my country as kid and it included some of the deleted scenes as seen in the DVD). However going to the Star Wars articles like you mentioned there is mention of change.maybe we can add in the article of Superman four section of deleted scenes that not all scenes made it to the deleted scenes section of the Delux edition DVD and use the cemetary scene as an example (btw I saw it on mentioned on many forums by fans;gone unfortunately but there was lots of talk on the cemetary scene.).In the meantime I will take a look at the featured articles examples you provided. But I would like to discuss how we can approach this in an encyclopediac way.I brought it up on the talkpage of Superman 4.let's discuss it further there.

Regards.-Vmrgrsergr 06:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

PS-oh yes I own the delux edition of Superman 4 on DVD.I had 3 as well but traded that one at blockbuster.The delux editions were released in the boxed set and also indivudually, which is how I bought it as.I checked the deleted scnes hoping to find the cemetary scene but found nothing on it except on some forums and the link i provided you with.-Vmrgrsergr 06:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Writers and original research

I sent an e-mail to one of the writers of the Chainsaw comic asking a question and he sent me a response. I'd like to include the information in one of the articles but I'm not sure if that counts as original research. Is there any way to cite e-mails like that?--CyberGhostface 15:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Would making a screenshot of the e-mail be suitable enough?--CyberGhostface 15:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Alright, I'll try doing that. Thanks.--CyberGhostface 15:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Well I was told by another user that it wasn't a reliable source, that it counted as original research and that he "STRONGLY" reccomended I keep it off the article. Its a shame, as it was the answer to whether or not Hoyt was alive in the comics.--CyberGhostface 22:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I might send another message to the writer later asking him if he can publish it somehow but I don't want to do it now because I've already sent him a couple of messages.--CyberGhostface 02:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Paper

How did that paper of yours go? I'm taskless at the moment... —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't get me wrong; I was busy two days ago. Activity has tapered off since... I'm feeling like a cubicle drone these days. Might need to re-evaluate my life goals, haha. (Though I don't mind this internship too much; it'll boost my credentials so I can do whatever I like with my life down the road -- hopefully.) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Well, one crippling effect of the gig is that I don't have access to Google services. Thus, I can't access RSS feeds on Google Reader or Google Alerts in Gmail. So I can't be productive or contribute to Wikipedia as much. Any other extracurricular pursuits would be too obvious, like vacation plans strewn across my desk where there should be spreadsheets of data. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Wouldn't it be funny if Nolan staged something like this Scarecrow scene to weed out scoopers? I think it would be ridiculously awesome and nicely destroy any credibility that people may think scoopers have. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Atrocity1313 21:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)==Mind helping me?== hey Bignole, if your knowledge of HALO 2 is vast, mind helping me? Contact me on my talk pageAtrocity1313 19:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Join the Dark side, we have cookies!

Im trying to solve 2 mysteries.The mystery of the gate, and the IWHBYD (I Would Have Been Your Daddy) skull. look for both on youtube.Join the Dark side, we have cookies!

Highlander stuff

Dear God, i did not know there was that much uncited fancruft inthe Highlander articles. Gah! - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 19:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Hannibal Lecter

Sorry for bothering you again (I know I do it a lot but you seem to be the most knowledgeable about these affairs) but a user is attempting to add a death list of Lecter's victims to Hannibal's article. I removed it per Wikipedia's rules about indiscriminate information and he's accusing me of vandalism now.--CyberGhostface 21:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

(Removed warning, by Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 22:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC))

Oh, I'm so sorry! You are quite right, I clicked the wrong name and didn't take enough care. My most humble apologies. I've removed the above warning. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 22:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I must have made a real mess of that particular pair of warnings, then! Thanks for reporting him — I reported a user before but ended up somehow not filling out a full report (so no action was taken against the user, but the page was protected at least). Hopefully there are no bad feelings over this. :-) Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 22:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

RE:Hannibal

Nope. WP:PPOL states that when protecting a page, administrators should not revert to any prior state. « ANIMUM » 22:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Spider Man 4

Meh, protecting looks like a bit of an over-reaction and there's no evidence that there are constant problems with people forking the content. I'll keep the page on my watchlist though. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 22:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

RE:Hannibal Lector

Sure, go ahead. (I've also been using those templates more frequently now. :) ) « ANIMUM » 22:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm not saying to unblock him ( a 3rr is a 3rr and he's guilty of that), but user:CyberGhostface did back right off when I warned him. HalfShadow 22:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't think blocking Cyber is best now. He was already given a warning, and upon that ceased to even edit the article in the time that CJK proceded to revert with another editor and it was finally protected. I don'tk now, it just comes off like we slapped his wrists once, and then decided he needed the belt instead.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 23:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I've unblocked him. At issue here is (from WP:3RR) In the cases where multiple editors violate the rule, administrators should treat all sides equally. However, CJK has been disruptive in other ways (and violated 3RR on another article), so this is not really unbalanced. In fact, since CJK got a twenty-four hour block as well, the unblock here probably makes things more fair. -- tariqabjotu 01:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, Bignole. I'll keep in mind the 1RR rule in the future.--CyberGhostface 02:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Batman

Sorry, didn't mean to provoke anyone. Didn't think it would since your original content for the article was focussed on the Burton/Schumacher series which I gave its own article. I'm sure everyone will agree to the change anyway. A gx7 04:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Doh, when I looked at the article for Return of the Joker, I had only glanced at who voiced Terry McGinnis. Kind of slipped my mind about the older Bruce Wayne that was in the series/film. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Indiana Jones

I got the films on DVD a few weeks ago, so I'm pretty familiar with them. I've never seen anything else in the franchise, though. ColdFusion650 13:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

The last plea for help

How much do you know about House of the dead 3? And im speaking to every1 here!  ATROCITY1313 

Can u recommend any1?P|0X  ATROCITY1313 

thanks anywho.  ATROCITY1313 

RE: Matthew Fenton

Hey, just wanted to warn you that fighting with Matthew Fenton may be hazardous to your health. The admins around here tend to take his side, especially when he's in the wrong, simply because he's only 14 or 15 years old. He's also been known to have good Wikians blocked permanently because they refuse to jump whenever he or his pal Will "Sceptre" Nobel yell "frog". I suggest checking out the history of Sixty Six's talk page - you have to look at the history and see the last few changes, as Scepter and one of his other admin buddies purged and locked the pages out of spite. I'm not saying you should give up the fight, but make sure you've got admins that will back you up when the time comes. Nobody knows why they keep defending them as if they've done nothing wrong, but if you go through their talk page archives, it's pretty obvious they're causing far more harm to Wikipedia than they should be allowed to. Good luck! 24.173.10.197 23:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Who on earth is Matthew Fenton? I see to recall a User:Matthew reverting a alteration I tried to make with the main actor template and was quite rude about it but I am certianly not fighting with anyone -I'd forgotten about it - I couldn't care less about arguing with somebody/ Who is he and why on earth would anyone ever think of blocking me? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 23:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: Batman

Sorry about the add. I was under the impression that this was the official released poster for "The Dark Knight". Hope no one was offended.

Re: Batman

Thats what I had thought at first, but i did see the poster on Heath Ledger's website. I also saw it used on multiple websites as the poster for "The Dark Knight". The website for "The Dark Knight" doesn't give much of anything anyway.

IFD

Whoops, I didn't notice that. However, I'm going to leave his block in effect, as he was being disruptive on the IFD. --Coredesat 19:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Oops, I blocked Hornet, sorry. I forgot to specify that. --Coredesat 19:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

That's fine, it's a somewhat hectic situation. Hopefully it's sorted out now. :P --Coredesat 19:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Photobucket

Just when I decided to revert info on Nick Fury/Scarecrow on other articles, I had a look at the ET info you supplied and problem is, I don't have your password. Ooops.

I saw Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer by the way, fun, I loved Surfer's depiction and the banter between Johnny and Ben. But Galactus dissapointed, even if I swore I saw a face in there. Alientraveller 12:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Smallville

Per the black-letter policy Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, articles that have been discussed at AFD are not eligible to be prodded. This article, as you are aware as you noted the AFD on my talk page, was AFDed here. If you disagree with the outcome, you may discuss it with the closing admin or take it to deletion review. Otto4711 14:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)