User talk:New England

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by New England (talk | contribs) at 04:25, 20 June 2007 (rv vandalism). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search
To post a new message click here.
When you post here, please sign your post with four tildes ~~~~.
In General, I will respond to all comments left on this page on both my talk page and yours. However, there are times where I may just reply at one or the other.
I will remove abusive, bothersome, annoying, or inane comments. See Talk page guidelines & Wikiquette.
Sections will generally be archived by me if no new posts have been made in a week or so. To view my older discussions, go here. Just remember that if you wish to bring up a topic discussed in the archive please do so on this page, and link to the prior discussion to provide context.

Ck lostsword's RfA - Thanks

Thanks very much for your support in my recent RfA, which passed successfully at 40/2/1, making me Wikipedia's 1,250th administrator. Your comments were much appreciated, and I will endeavour to fulfil your expectations as an admin.


ck lostsword T C

File:Ck lostsword copy.png

ck lostsword T C 17:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page for more information. —AldeBaer 21:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I took at it, but it essentially just confirms what I thought the opposer meant. Black Harry (T|C) (Go Red Sox!) 04:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my RFA

Thank you for supporting my RFA. I hope I will live up to your expectation. Let me know if you need any help, or I make any mistake. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 23:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey no problem man. I feel you're very qualified to handle the mop and bucket. I might need help, but doubt you'll make many mistakes. Black Harry (T|C) (Go Red Sox!) 00:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that the somewhat annoying comments should stay, but that the racist and anti-gay stuff should not, but he seems to think otherwise. I don't know policy here, so I'll need to defer. I hope I didn't give the impression that someone had intentionally done something wrong. I really meant to keep what was useful. When he said that we should keep all, I was a bit surprised.

As far as the annoying talk page comments, that guy had a point. The article is somewhat Boston-centric and does not properly acknowledge that parts of New England are at this point less joined to the region than to New York. He doesn't, though, make his case particularly well. More patient editors will sort this stuff out over time. Jd2718 05:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There aren't any policies that necessarily dictate that the more offensive stuff should stay or go. but I believe that if you keep the trolling comments, you should keep the offensive ones, though a disclaimer should be given stating that "Some readers may find these statements offensive, but they are preserved for the record, and do not represent the opinions of Wikipedia".
The main reason why the article may seem Boston-centric is that historically New England was very much tied to Boston, and many areas, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and eastern Connecticut still have ties to Boston (not sure about Vermont, but I'd say they still look at Boston as their 'capital'). However, no reliable sources can be (or have been) found to suggest that part of Western CT (or anywhere else in New England) no longer think of themselves as part of New England. Black Harry (T|C) (Go Red Sox!) 18:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]