User talk:Yamaguchi先生

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alexduncan1 (talk | contribs) at 23:54, 3 June 2007 (Im Cool). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Today's motto...

If you can "surf" the Web, Wikipedia is the Pacific Ocean.


Nominate one today!



Welcome!

Hello Yamaguchi先生, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --HappyCamper 00:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


thank you very much
You're welcome. Have a good day! :-) --HappyCamper 23:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Women

Yup, that was me.  :) That was originally a speedy delete due to lack of content and being little more than a placeholder for the IMDb link. It looks better, but it's still a bit stubby although certainly not a speedy at this point. Since you're still "trying things out" as you say, may I say "welcome to the club" and suggest that you look at other movie-related articles to get a feel for the style. For instance, you should have a cast and character list, more of a plot synopsis, perhaps a taxobox with basic info as well. The Wikipedia:Manual of style is a huge help. I'll be glad to help as well. Feel free to leave word on my talk page any time you'd like. I won't be near a computer this weekend, but I'll see any message you leave come Monday. Have a great weekend! - Lucky 6.9 14:03, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contribution at 29 October 2005 New Delhi bombings.
- P R A D E E P Somani (talk)
Feel free to send me e-mail.

Thanks from Pamri

Hi, Thanks a ton for voting at my RFA. I am now a wikipedia administrator and I hope I can keep your trust. Thanks again. --Pamri TalkReply 03:56, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you very much for supporting my rather contentious request for adminship, but now that I've been promoted, I'd like to do a little dance here *DANCES*. If you have any specific issues/problems with me, please feel free to state them on my talk page so that I can work to prevent them in the future, and thanks once again!  ALKIVAR 07:50, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yamaguchi先生

Thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was (96/2/0), so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any queries about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Again, thanks!

FireFox 18:23, 8 November 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Hi! This is not systematic bias. I am an Indian. I've nominated US lists for deletion as well. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newsweek’s List of Top High Schools (2003), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newsweek's List of the 1,000 Top U.S. Schools and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newsweek's List of the 1,000 Top U.S. Schools (2005). Could you please do a rethink on your vote. utcursch | talk 05:48, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contacting me but my vote still stands. If you can cite an existing precedent that shows Wikipedia excludes these type of lists I may be willing to reconsider. Yamaguchi先生 07:37, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AIV requests

Hi, I blocked the two IPs you recently listed. I have a request though: when you are leaving {{test}} notices on talk pages, could you please remember to sign your posts after each test warning, so that it's easy to confirm that an IP has continued to vandalize after having been warned? Thanks! MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip 08:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay if I just put the time instead? I do not want to give those type of people my name. Yamaguchi先生 08:25, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I think a five tilde ~~~~~ timestamp would be perfectly fine. Thanks! MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip 08:28, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I mean no offense toward Asians, but I really have to ask: How many vandals do you think would be able to type "Yamaguchi先生" on their keyboards? For many users, it appears as "Yamaguchi" followed by two squares anyway. It looks like you are a new user, so I will give you a suggestion if you are concerned about this: you might consider setting your signature to something like:
<span class="plainlinks">[{{SERVER}}{{Localurl:User_talk:Yamaguchi先生|action=edit&section=new}} Yamaguchi先生]</span>
which would appear like this when you use "~~~~":
Yamaguchi先生 22:21, 19 October 2024
Click on it to see the difference. This setting can be found in the "Nickname:" box of Special:Preferences. Doing this would at least force the unsophisticated vandals to create a new section on your talk page rather than giving them easy access to vandalize it, or your user page.
freak(talk) 08:22, May. 26, 2007 (UTC) 16:41, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warnings

A cabal toaster

Hi, thank you for trying to improve the Wikipedia by removing vandalism and warning vandals. :D Normally we should only start with a test, test2, or test2a template for the first warning on someone, depending on how blatant their vandalism is. It's sorta biting newbies to start with a test3 or higher, unless they're doing something *really* stupid. Most vandals are simply newbies who are all like "omg i can edit this site? wtf were they thinking?!?!?!11". They might not even realize other people could see their edits. Then, instead of simply banning them on the first offense, we generally give them numerous warnings, and they think "Hey, these people are pretty cool. I screwed up their site and they didn't even ban me!". And maybe they'll be new contributers. :D Anyway, have a cabal toaster for your hard work. --Phroziac(talk) 15:31, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the toaster and the advice. Yamaguchi先生 15:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks from myself as well for stopping the defacement at Patrick Henry College. I second Phroziac: I have reverted many edits by users such as those three and they usually stop after a couple of warnings. --DDerby-[[User talk:DDerby|<small>(talk)</small>]] 08:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


I see you're editting again. Maybe you can explain what "Yamaguchi" means... Thanx 68.39.174.238 01:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's a common Japanese family name, and it's a name of a Japanese town too. --Ichiro 01:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof application

Thanks for applying to use VandalProof. Unfortunately, our software is not particularly good at recognising non-ascii characters. We have had issues in the past with such users, and in this case I am going to have to politely request that you register an alternative account (visit Special:Userlogin while still logged in so the account is recorded as a subsidiary of this one, and we cna prove it belongs to you), it would be sensible to do it with a similar name, in order to use the tool. We will of course consider edits from both accounts for the purposes of verification and other processes such as WP:RFA should be directed to the presence of contributions from both accounts. My apologies for the problems, and I hope that we can get you up and running with VandalProof soon. Thanks. —Xyrael / 21:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although I have no problem myself with you striking out your name from the holds section, for technical reasons it's probably best if you ask a moderator to do it. I'm not sure if it applies to that page, but on another VP does some strange stuff to recognise who cna edit it. I'm not criticisng you though, just letting you know that there is a better option :) Thanks, I'll go approve your app now. —Xyrael / 19:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Xyrael, please remove my strikethrough if it might cause any technical problems. Yamaguchi先生 19:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pending deletion of Greg Bravo (Gary Scott)

*Articles for deletion. I invite you to review your vote for deletion on the Greg Bravo (Gary Scott) article again (proposed on 6/19), as official and reliable proof that can be actually be verified and not "talked about" has been provided. Apparently the user that calls himself Fortheloveofhampsters has a vendetta against the subject of the article and has been suspected of being a sockpupett according to the history tabs of article and its related talk page! He is now attacking the related article of Steam (band) in the same manner. Of course, everyone has the right to edit, but must also provide reliable and verifiable sources and maintain a Neutral Point of View according to official Wikipedia policy. Apparently, the user who may be one of more of those who are voting for deletion are definitely not neutral and do not play by all the rules. Does anyone enforce them even-handedly?

I would not like to see this site become a blog, as some have called it, and would like to continue my contributions. Is the only way to set the record straight to form coalitions and posses like America was run in the days of the "Wild West". Seems to me even then, there were at least some rules to abide by that were actually enforced and not totally ignored by those in charge.

Can you at least provide some guidance to me? So far, logical arguments and intelligence in accordance with the (sporadically enforced) rules of Wikipedia do not seem to be effective. --Countdewiki 04:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well as I have stated on the deletion page this article is in dire need of reliable sources to be kept, otherwise it is not verifiable and gives the appearance of being a hoax. Yamaguchi先生 18:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Armando Lloréns-Sar

Why are you restoring content designed to harrass and attack the subject? Whether the article should exist or not is a matter for AFD. But that is no justification for restoring attacking content. Most people who have not voted to delete have voted to merge. Why do you want to overturn the majority opinion, let alone restoring content meant to threaten the livelihood of the subject? Guettarda 03:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please allow the discussion to complete, as I have requested in my edit summary. The article content is completely neutral in tone, based upon facts from reliable sources, and is not even remotely an attack page. Your implication that a majority wants this to be redirected is unfounded, as the number of those who have expressed their will to keep it equals that of those who wish to see it merged somewhere else, while those who have requested it be deleted are in the minority. Thank you, Yamaguchi先生 06:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How is it not an attack page when it was created and used to out the subject and threaten his livelihood? Why do you believe that Wikipedia should be used for harrassment? And how does one version or another "allow for discussion"? People who don't know what a page history is probably aren't familar enough with Wikipedia to participate in policy discussions. Guettarda 13:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing within the text is of an attack-type nature, and I am not sure what policy discussion you are referring to. Can you try to explain this to me in a calm manner? For example, if the subject goes on National Public Radio's Morning Edition and other major radio broadcasts and identifies himself as attorney Armando Lloréns of Daily KOS, and then it is cited and written about at Wikipedia, how does this threaten the livelihood of that person? I honestly do not understand. Yamaguchi先生 17:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brendon Urie

The two most recent vandals have been blocked (one for vandalism after bv, the other for an inappropriate username plus vandalism). Thanks for the alerts, OhNoitsJamie Talk 07:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in my RfA!

Thanks for voting!
Hello Yamaguchi先生, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

If you have a moment, I'd appreciate your reviewing my comment at the bottom of this AfD. Thanks. Ste4k 16:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not reviewing this in time, I was on a short wikibreak. Yamaguchi先生 04:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you for your vote in my RFA, which succeeded with a final tally of 66-0-4. If there's anything I can help you with now that I'm an admin, please let me know on my talk page. Again, thanks! Mangojuicetalk 21:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schoonmaker again

You may be interested in this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Craig Schoonmaker (3rd nomination). Ground Zero | t 19:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

myg0t

Hi, I noticed you had some history reguarding the myg0t article. Well, the article is up for DrV, and I ask that you post your thoughts on whether or not it should be undeleted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#myg0t - thanks, cacophony 23:28, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That does not ring a bell but I will take a look. Yamaguchi先生 09:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

honeybee dance language AFD

Good evening. There have been some new facts and evidence presented in the discussion since your last edit. When you have a minute, would you mind taking the time to revisit the discussion? Thanks. Rossami (talk) 22:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IFD

I have updated the discussion at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 August 1 if you care to respond. Thanks. Megapixie 08:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent AfD

Hello. You recently participated in an AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taco Bell menu. The article was deleted but is up for deletion review here. I thought you may be interested in participating in that discussion. Ifnord 03:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know, since you edited it at least once, that it is now nominated as a featured article. It might not make it since it still needs some more work. Thanks. Steve Dufour 18:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delayed response, it will be my pleasure to help where I can. Yamaguchi先生 20:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I made some additions to this and wondered what you thought. There seems to be an interesting article in here. --Guinnog 01:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roy St. Clair

I already argued to keep in the AfD - but I'd like to hear a little more about your argument for undeletion before I really say whether it's worthwhile. I suspect you'd need to dig up some high quality sources before you stood a chance. WilyD 19:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Username suggestion

I think your username is inappropriate in that it contains non-Latin characters. Please consider changing it. Thanks. J Ditalk 20:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concern, but this is my name and I have no intentions of changing it. You will find that many long term contributors to Wikipedia have names which contain non-Latin characters. Yamaguchi先生 20:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Power Glove

On the Power Glove article you entered an unreferenced tag. Could you please be more specific over what part you wish to have referenced? The Powerglove is a pop-culture icon and as such; statements in the article may be difficult to source because they are considered verifyable popular/common knowledge - Wikipedia:Common knowledge. So please specify the segment you think is needing of referencing. - Roidroid 06:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most of what is contained in the article is not common knowledge at all. The Power Glove may not have been as large a commercial failure as the R.O.B., but simply attaining pop-culture status does not excuse us from citing sources within any given article. Since you disagree with a general {{unreferenced}} template, I will be providing citation needed tags where it is appropriate. Yamaguchi先生 22:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, the individual citation tags are much more helpful Roidroid 07:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getwiki

You voted keep on the deletion vote. Cyde deleted it when the votes for either opinion were equal which is quiet bbizarre. If it is ok with you then let's take it to deletion review? Hope to here from you asap. Unitedroad 06:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is acceptable thank you for notification. Yamaguchi先生 22:00, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cue-dependent forgetting

Thanks for the help reverting those bogus edits. I've protected the page for now, to prevent it continuing. Am also looking at blocking those users. --Oscarthecat 21:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Oscar, I am glad to have helped. Yamaguchi先生 21:18, 24 September 2006

Thanks! re: Johnny Rebel (singer) vandalism

Dear Yamaguchi,

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on Johnny Rebel (singer). I've been dealing with this anonymous AOL user for a couple weeks or so, and he checks in just about daily to delete an external link, and on occasion to leave racist graffiti. Your help is much appreciated!

Sincerely,

--Skb8721 16:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nishkid64's RfA thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RfA, which closed successfully earlier today with a result of (60/9/4). Although, I encountered a few problems in my RfA, I have peacefully resolved my conflicts and made amends with the people involved. If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free talk to me. I hope I will live up to your expectations. --Nishkid64 22:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation

I have solemnly acknowledged this message and have abided by the procedures of redemption. This will never happen again. Thank you for your support Bgmag88 22:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine, thank you. Yamaguchi先生 22:48, 30 September 2006

RfB With A Smile :)

      

Thanks for your help

Thanks for your help with the Charla Sedacca article, that really means a lot -- Philly BB 00:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

You are welcome, it is my pleasure. Yamaguchi先生 01:28, 18 October 2006

My RfA

Announcement: It's an administrator!

Yamaguchi先生, thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was a robust 62/1/1, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any questions about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks again, Chris Griswold
Congratulations to you on your new promotion. Yamaguchi先生 01:28, 18 October 2006

Username

Hello Yamaguchi. I saw you reverting vandalism while on RC patrol. You do quite a good job. However, your username is against Wikipedia's official policy of usernames. Kindly review the policy and consider changing your username. WP:USERNAME states as follows —

Names with non-Latin characters: Unfortunately, most of your fellow editors will be unable to read a name written in Cyrillic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, or other scripts. Many of them will also be additionally burdened, as such names may be displayed for them only as question marks ("??? ??"), squares ("□□□ □□"), replacement characters ("??? ??") or worse, nonsense or mojibake ("Ã!%ôs*"). If your name is usually written in a non-Latin script, please consider transliterating it to avoid confusion, and allow easier access to your talk page by typing your name in the search field or URL bar.

My suggestion is that you could remove the non-latin characters. Visit WP:CHU for changing your username. — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 12:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Headless Nick, but I am not interesting in changing, this is my name. Yamaguchi先生 12:26, 16 October 2006
I do not contend whether it is your name or not. But the thing is that it is an official policy on Wikipedia. Non-Latin characters cause trouble to users. Please keep an open mind on this issue and comply. — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 12:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that this message was removed by some other user, probably by mistake so I took the liberty of restoring it. I have seen you around and skimmed through your contributions. In my opinion you have a good potential to become a future administrator. This would be sadly hampered if you continued with a username with non-latin characters in it. Please assume good faith with me, and get your username changed. You can also get an anonymous username so that when you warn the vandals, they will not come to know about your name. Best regards, — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 15:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I will have to agree with Nearly Headless Nick on this one. We cannot force you to change your username, but please seriously consider it or many editors will start off against you if you were to pursue something like an RFA. Thanks. —Mets501 (talk) 01:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is this not a global project? I understand that for some it may appear as two boxes or question marks, but fail to see how this has any impact on what we are doing here — working together to to make a better encyclopedia. There are many editors who already have account names that use non-ASCII characters in addition in addition to mine, and I politely ask that you please respect my wishes to use my name to edit. Thank you for your understanding in this matter. Yamaguchi先生 01:51, 22 October 2006
Seriously WTF Nick... This isnt an IMAGE. This is a valid acceptable username that was made long before WP:SIG said stuff about no non-english characters. This isnt a drain on server resources, in fact forcing him to change names WOULD be a drain on server resources as the server would have to redirect all of his previous edits to a new username. Let this one drop dude...  ALKIVAR 03:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please, I do not want people to argue over this here, that is not my intent. If it would help, I am willing to submit this to the scrutiny of the username talk page or village pump for wider discussion. This should not be a big deal. Yamaguchi先生 03:32, 22 October 2006
Hi Yamaguchi: it's not the signature that's the problem: you can feel free to keep the (japanese?) characters in your signature; it's the actual username itself, as it's impossible for a user like me to type your username into the search box and find your userpage without finding one of your contributions and clicking on it. —Mets501 (talk) 11:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As has been said several times, your username is in violation of Wikipedia's username policy because it uses non-Latin characters. Please head over to WP:CHU as soon as possible to request that your username be changed. Failure to do so in a timely manner will result in you being blocked. -- tariqabjotu 03:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not threaten me, that is highly uncalled for. It has been explained above why changing my name is not necessary and I have put in place redirects like requested. Futhermore, my account was created many months before this policy was enacted. Thanks for understanding, Yamaguchi先生 03:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Where does it say that? -- tariqabjotu 03:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Up above. If you believe my username is violating please feel free to discuss it on WP:CHU. Thanks, Yamaguchi先生 03:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I raised the question at the administrators' noticeboard. However, note that users who repeatedly ignore requests to change usernames due to inappropriateness can be blocked. That was not highly uncalled for; if the compromise does not work, my warning will stand. -- tariqabjotu 03:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the above it was an uncalled for threat in my opinion. If it comes down to it, I'll leave voluntarily. I was here long before such a Euro-centric policy was put in place. Yamaguchi先生 03:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You must be referring to Mets' comprimise. That's interesting... not sure if that works. I'll get back to you. -- tariqabjotu 03:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As you can see, there's little or no support for a block over this matter. You should register User:Yamaguchi, though, to make sure no one else does. Chick Bowen 04:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An inquiry.

Yamaguchi xiang sheng, Do you mind explaining as to why I will be banned if I continue to revert to the version of the International School of Kuala Lumpur article that includes the Student Opinions? I'm much confused by your actions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yetieater (talkcontribs) 12:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not place for your personal opinion, stop adding nonsense. Yamaguchi先生 12:36, 16 October 2006
Are not personal opinions useful in themselves? I see no purpose for the deletion of such opinions. Perhaps other students have a more favorable account of their experience at the institution. I myself see no reason for such behavior against the posting of personal opinions. Yetieater 12:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hey Yamaguchi,

I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed unanimously with a final tally of 38/0/0. I appreciate your trust, and will do my best to uphold it. Don't hesitate to let me know if you ever need anything. — TKD::Talk 05:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA!

               Yamaguchi先生, thank you so much for your support for my RfA. I passed with a vote tally of 61/0/1. I am honored that the consensus was to allow me the added privilege of the admin mop. I appreciate your support and kind words on my RFA! --plange 15:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Yamaguchi先生,

I see looking at the WikiProject user warnings page, that you have recently become a participant in this project. To bring you up to speed, I have recently started an undertaking to harmonise all user page warnings and templates. For this I would like your assistance. I have listed a number of ideas on the project template page here as a first draft. I fully appreciate that as with most editors and admins, that you are fairly busy. Therefore I am not looking for anyone to carry out the actual work, I am willing to do that myself, with help from a number of other RC Patrollers who have come forward. But what I am looking for is your invaluable input, on the draft ideas and also to suggest other ways you believe we may improve the templates. I do however require the services of a couple of administrators to put into effect some of the new templates, as they are currently protected. Please take 5 mins to look through the new templates page, and both the project and templates talk pages and leave any ideas or suggestions that you may have. Best regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 10:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your lovely barnstar

Hey Yamaguchi, I honestly don't know what I did to deserve such a wonderfully unexpected surprise, but I feel truly honoured by your barnstar and the lovely words you wrote. Thankyou so much, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 15:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cooler heads prevail

Look, I are from your comments that you hate anons, but realize that we're not all evil trolls and that, for whatever multitude of possible reasons --good, bad or paranoid, qe choose to use the website in the same way its always been intended. Peace. --216.9.250.61 03:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost delivery

Since RAL315's userpage says he will be out I'll answer. You sign up here: Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist -Ravedave (help name my baby) 05:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your support in my RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. I do however very much appreciate your comments, and found them encouraging. Please rest assured that I am still in support of the Wikipedia project, and will continue to contribute without interruption. Thanks again! --Elonka 09:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Agoni

You're right. Sorry for editing the article. As childish as this may sound, it wasn't me who started it :D But yea, I should've deleted the innacurate information they put up and left it at that, but I didnt. Sorry, and it wont happen again :)

Btw, do I know you, in real life (as opposed to through the internet)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agoni (talkcontribs) 23:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Flinders

Thanks for your revert - I didnt put that stuff in -someone is doing something sneaky! SatuSuro 06:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!!

Sorry for the delay, I have been/am away on vacation... my first ever wikiSmile!!! Appreciated! :) Glen 11:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 6th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 45 6 November 2006 About the Signpost

Arbitration election campaigns begin Blogger studies Wikipedia appearance in search results
Intelligence wiki receives media attention Report from the German Wikipedia
News and notes: Foundation donation, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Reference added to Powerglove article

I added the references you requested to the Powerglove article. Devil Master 16:26, 7 November 2006 (MET)

RfA thanks!

My brand-spankin' new mop!
My brand-spankin' new mop!

My RfA done
I hope to wield my mop well
(Her name is Vera)

I appreciate
The support you have shown me
(I hope I don't suck)

Anyway, I just
wanted to drop you a line
(damn, haikus are hard)

EVula // talk // // 16:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Todd Grisham - KOLD-TV.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Todd Grisham - KOLD-TV.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok 22:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this image if you believe it fails fair use criteria. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 22:21, 14 November 2006

Signpost updated for November 13th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 46 13 November 2006 About the Signpost

Full accessibility, dramatic growth reported for Chinese Wikipedia ArbCom elections: Information on Elections
Report identifies Wikipedia as a leader in non-US traffic News and notes: Board passes four resolutions, milestones
Wikipedia in the News Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 23:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Your username

Hi Yamaguchi先生. How about this for a compromise: you register the name "Yamaguchi", and create the pages User:Yamaguchi, which would redirect to User:Yamaguchi先生, and User talk:Yamaguchi, which would redirect to User talk:Yamaguchi先生. Therefore other editors could reach your user and user talk pages easily. :-) —Mets501 (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


RFA Thanks

Thanks!
Thanks for your input on my (nearly recent) Request for adminship, which regretfully achived no consensus, with votes of 68/28/2. I am grateful for the input received, both positive and in opposition, and I'd like to thank you for your participation.
Georgewilliamherbert 05:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 20th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 47 20 November 2006 About the Signpost

One week later, Wikipedia reblocked in mainland China Military history dominates writing contest
News and notes: Wikibooks donation, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for November 27th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 48 27 November 2006 About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections: Candidate profiles Steward elections begin
Group apologizes for using Wikipedia name in online arts fundraiser News and notes: 1.5 million articles, milestones
Wikipedia in the News Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]


Health Wiki Research

A colleague and I are conducting a study on health wikis. We are looking at how wikis co-construct health information and create communities. We noticed that you are a frequent contributor to Wikipedia on health topics.

Please consider taking our survey here.

This research will help wikipedia and other wikis understand how health information is co-created and used.

We are from James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The project was approved by our university research committee and members of the Wikipedia Foundation.

Thanks, --Sharlene Thompson 18:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not participate on any health-related wiki sites. May I ask why you selected me for this survey and where I can confirm this project approval? Yamaguchi先生 02:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for December 4th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 49 4 December 2006 About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections open The Seigenthaler incident: One year later
Wikimedia celebrates Commons milestone, plans fundraiser Wikipedia wins award in one country, reported blocked in another
News and notes: Steward elections continue, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for December 11th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 50 11 December 2006 About the Signpost

From the editor: New feature
Board of Trustees expanded as three new members are appointed Wikimedia Foundation releases financial audit
Arbitration Committee elections continue, extra seat available Female-only wiki mailing list draws fire
Trolling organization's article deleted WikiWorld comic: "Redshirt"
News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Youtube

Please can you vote on the renetto article. Thanks FrummerThanThou 04:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

para Todo la nina y ninos


yo Ken-y gustas la chicas de puerto rico.

Hi,

You have put yourself as interested in helping out at WikiProject on user warnings. We are now at a stage where we are creating the new templates and are wondering if you are still interested? If so please visit the overview page and choose a warning type you wish to work on. There is a base template available here, which you can copy and use to get you started. Have a look through the redirects and see what old templates are affected and incorporate them into the the new system. Anyway, any questions please don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 09:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for December 18th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 51 18 December 2006 About the Signpost

From the editor: Holiday publication
Elections conclude, arbitrators to be chosen Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser opens
WikiWorld comic: "Dr. Seuss" News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Username discussions

There has been a proposal made by Bastique over the issues of non-latin characters and unified issues on WT:U. As you have already been involved in discussions regarding this, I invite you to participate in the discussions. Regards, — Nearly Headless Nick {C} {L} 17:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Sir Nicholas, I appreciate this notification. Yamaguchi先生 02:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UW future?

Hi Yamaguchi先生,

Sorry for the blatant spam, but you have yourself down as interested at WikiProject user warnings WP:UW. There is a discussion on going here that might be of interest to you about the future of this project. There are two strawpolls on the talk pages and the second one is about the future of the WP:UW project. Now we have the end in sight we are looking at wrapping up the project and merging it with Template messages/User talk namespace WP:UTM and creating a one stop shop for all userspace templates. As you have yourself down as interested in this project we thought you may have some input on this issue, and would like you to visit the discussion and give any thoughts you may have on the matter. Cheers Khukri 10:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 12 20 March 2007 About the Signpost

WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" News and notes: Bad sin, milestones
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 13 26 March 2007 About the Signpost

From the editor: Tardiness, volunteers, RSS
Patrick and Wool resign in office shakeup WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
News and notes: Board resolutions, milestones Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Invitation to discussion on notability

Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 17:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what are you talking about??

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 14 2 April 2007 About the Signpost

Poll finds people think Wikipedia "somewhat reliable" Wikipedia biographical errors attract more attention
Association of Members' Advocates nominated for deletion Reference desk work leads to New York Times correction
WikiWorld comic: "Charles Lane" News and notes: Alexa, Version 0.5, attribution poll
Wikipedia in the news Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 15 9 April 2007 About the Signpost

Danny Wool regains adminship in controversial RFA Leak last year likely to produce changes for handling next board election
Association of Members' Advocates' deletion debate yields no consensus WikiWorld comic: "Fake shemp"
News and notes: Donation, Version 0.5, milestones Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smiling

I am glad I brought a smile to you, but what is so funny about it? Is it the implications about fixing the vote? :) RogueNinjatalk 02:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 16 16 April 2007 About the Signpost

Encyclopædia Britannica promoted to featured article Wikipedia continues to get mixed reactions in education
WikiWorld comic: "Hodag" News and notes: Wikipedia television mention makes news, milestones
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Staff_Sgt_George_T_Alexander_Jr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Staff_Sgt_George_T_Alexander_Jr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Todd_Grisham_-_KOLD-TV.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Todd_Grisham_-_KOLD-TV.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 19:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 17 23 April 2007 About the Signpost

Administrator goes rogue, is blocked Wales unblocks Brandt, then reverses himself
Historian detained after his Wikipedia article is vandalized Efforts to reform Requests for Adminship spark animated discussion
Canadian politician the subject of an edit war Virginia Tech massacre articles rise to prominence
Wikipedia enters China one disc at a time WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"
News and notes: Unreferenced biographies, user studies, milestones Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dat Phan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dat Phan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 19:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 18 30 April 2007 About the Signpost

Students in Western Civilization course find editing Wikipedia frustrating, rewarding Statistics indicate breadth of Wikipedia's appeal
Featured lists reaches a milestone Backlogs continue to grow
WikiWorld comic: "Calvin and Hobbes" News and notes: Board resolutions, user studies, milestones
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 19 7 May 2007 About the Signpost

Four administrator accounts desysopped after hijacking, vandalism Digg revolt over DVD key spills over to Wikipedia
Debate over non-free images heats up Update on Wikimania 2007
Norwegian Wikipedian awarded scholarship WikiWorld comic: "Friday the 13th"
News and notes: Election volunteers, admin contest, milestones Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 20 14 May 2007 About the Signpost

Administrator status restored to five accounts after emergency desysopping User committed identities provide protection against account hijacking
Academic journals multiply their analyses of Wikipedia WikiWorld comic: "Ubbi dubbi"
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 21 21 May 2007 About the Signpost

Corporate editing lands in Dutch media Spoiler warnings may be tweaked
WikiWorld comic: "Disruptive technology" News and notes: LGBT project mention, milestones
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul McCarthy

I read your comment in the Paul McCarthy deletion discussion. I do hope you will take the time to find the sources that you mention. The AfD discussion seemed terribly one-sided (and very quick) given the lack of sources. --Bejnar 19:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If by one-sided you mean unanimous, then yes. There are sources now so I believe this matter can be closed. Yamaguchi先生 03:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for your help!

Thanks for your help on the Chinese American Food Society article. You will happy to know that the article was saved from deletion. I really appreciated your help on this. Chris 18:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wat am i doing wrong? i am just trying to contribute valuable information to this great organisation!- Bold text'Bold text' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexduncan1 (talkcontribs) 18:21, May 30, 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 22 28 May 2007 About the Signpost

Controversy over biographies compounded when leading participant blocked Norwegian Wikipedian, journalist dies at 59
WikiWorld comic: "Five-second rule" News and notes: Wikipedian dies, Alexa rank, Jimbo/Colbert, milestones
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Cummings AfD

Yamaguchi??, You participated in the first AfD discussion for the Rebecca Cummings article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Cummings. The decision was keep but it has been nominated for deletion a second time. I thought you may be interested in participating in the discussion that is going on at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rebecca_Cummings_%282nd_nomination%29. Thanks in advance. --HeartThrobs 01:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

You supported my candidacy in my recently completed request for adminship. The debated ended 40/4/1 and I'm now an administrator. I'd just like to say thanks for taking the time to consider me, and thanks for the confidence in me. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified.

Regards, WilyD

Im Cool

Im Cool