User talk:Lipsticked Pig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lipsticked Pig (talk | contribs) at 03:49, 12 May 2007 (→‎External links). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Johntex welcomes you to Wikipedia

Hello Lipsticked Pig! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Johntex\talk 23:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TWA 800

Good work. --Guinnog 06:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get one of your spelling checks on this article? Much appreciated! Lipsticked Pig 19:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Happy to help out - I corrected what I found. Incidentally, I don't do anything too special when I'm typo fixing - I use WP:AWB for mass fixes when I'm going for speed (like trying to correct all instances of a single word). For this page I just copy and pasted the text into MS Word and let Microsoft's spell checker tell me what needed to be fixed. --Bachrach44 20:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of the Final Report

All NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports assign a "probable", not definite, cause. In the case of TWA 800, many of the investigative determinations were further qualified as being only "possible" or "very likely". Since the issuance of the report, most of the aspects of the investigation have been disputed.

Witnesses.

Wreckage recovery

Autopsies

Metallurgical

Sequencing

CWT explosion