User talk:Alan De Smet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Werdnabot (talk | contribs) at 15:10, 31 January 2007 (Automated archival of 6 sections to User talk:Alan De Smet/Archive1). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 60 days are automatically archived to User talk:Alan De Smet/Archive1. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Why am I deleting links to the "Guardians of Order Fan Forums"? Want to discuss it? See User talk:Alan De Smet/GoOFF. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alan De Smet (talkcontribs) 16:39, August 31, 2006.

Thanks for letting me know

And you beat me to it, I was going to put a comment in too :) --frothT C 04:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meddling with Dementation's user page

Hi, thanks for your message... yeah I know I shouldn't have over-reacted (or even reacted) to his personal attack - I blame a combination of jetlag and coffee for that, I think I reverted his talk page first (see reasoning there) and then got carried away :) Yeah basically he doesn't sem too keen to (ever) come back to Wikipedia, at least under that alias, maybe we could place a {{speedy}} on his userpage so a sysop can delete his account? Otherwise we'd have to re-insert all the warnings in case he did come back and resume editing. Sfacets 04:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to NASCRAG

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Alan De Smet! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 02:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on my talk page. Cheers! (You could always upload the image as a Fair use image at the very least.) Please reply back on my talk page. —— Eagle 101 (Need help?) 03:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I replied again. Cheers! —— Eagle 101 (Need help?) 03:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I replied agian :D —— Eagle 101 (Need help?) 04:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have replied again :D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eagle 101 (talkcontribs) 05:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
And agian :P —— Eagle 101 (Need help?) 05:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC) (can't believe I forgot to sign above :D) Cheers![reply]

Thanks for letting me know about your concerns. I'm planning on revising its warnings soon, and I'll take your comment into consideration. Shadow1 (talk) 13:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam warning from Shadowbot

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 02:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect judgement on Shadowbot's part. — Alan De Smet | Talk 05:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: BJBot suggestion: merge multiple notices

It is a good idea and I could do it but I think it is unnecessary because it is running on large backlogs at the moment, soon it will be running weekly or daily so it will not be spamming warnings as it is now. BJTalk 05:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Above is in reply to this message I posted. — Alan De Smet | Talk 05:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]