Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collections for Research into Sudeten German Minority (2nd)

Collections for Research into Sudeten German Minority

Collections for Research into Sudeten German Minority (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Does not satisfy notability to be an encyclopedic entry, it is a local group studying in the library!

Twice speedied 1st nomination

Comment: please note that it was due to the fact that the article was in German and not in English, previous debate should not be impeached. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 20:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment: it is a list of self-published works. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 20:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per above. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 19:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Behalten Tulkolahtens Privatkrieg gegen unserer Sammlung aus rassistischen Gründen. Gefällt Dir unsere Yad Vashem und Diploma of the Conservation & Environmental Grants program nicht, lieber Tulkolahten? --Dr. Steller 20:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Ist es ein Zufall: "Tomuto uživateli je čeština mateřským jazykem."?

Comment: strongly beware of personal attacks. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 20:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Warum? Müssen wir noch einmal den Buchstabe N, oder gelbe Stern tragen? --Dr. Steller20:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Please read this good faith. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 20:19, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

By request, here is a translation of the German remarks: ‘Tulkolahten’s private war against our collection for racist reasons. Do you not like our Yad Vashem and Diploma […] programme, dear Tulkolahten? […] Is this by chance: “Czech is this user’s first language.”[referring to a userbox on Tulkolahten’s user page]? […] Why? Do we have to wear the letter N or a yellow star again?’ (Note: I do not endorse or dispute these statements or their implications.) —xyzzy_n 20:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

context: yellow star. ~ trialsanderrors 21:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletions. -- Agathoclea 20:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:N, no third-party coverage of this research group. Oh, and Dr. Steller, please cease your personal attacks immediately, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sandstein 20:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete after moving to user space. The German article looks like it might be keepable, but the parts current present here aren’t sufficient to establish notability. —xyzzy_n 20:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Ah, thanks, I didn't look at the German version of the article. Based on that, it looks like it might very well be notable, but the German article also features no third party coverage. Sandstein 20:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No outside sources establishing notability and WP:AUTO. -- Agathoclea 20:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment The first deletion refered to above was due to the fact that the article was in German. Agathoclea 20:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Note German version de:Sudetendeutsche Wissenschaftliche Sammlung, which has some claims to notability, but also WP:COI issues. No opinion on the article yet, but I warned Dr. Steller on her talk page. ~ trialsanderrors 20:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)