Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B2C Jewels
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- B2C Jewels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am skeptical as to the notability of this online jewelry retail store. The only references, outside of business directories, are short mentions or vignettes in articles which are not about the B2C Jewels, but rather about online retailing in general. Psychonaut (talk) 14:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - Self-promotional, reads like a conversation. Not notable enough. RanJayJay (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC) — RanJayJay (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep - The company is notable, just that the article *could be* not to the mark. Someone should rather concentrate adding healthy content to the article. Google WebSearch [1] 63,600 Hits, Please refer all the Press Releases, Television, and Magazine coverage across US [2]. The article looks to be a good candidate for wiki. The article contains references about the company, which a neutral article should normally have. BalanceΩrestored Talk 10:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)