User talk:198.108.222.3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by VoABot II (talk | contribs) at 20:17, 9 April 2008 (BOT - Notifying user of reverted changes to Leopold I, Holy Roman Emperor.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Book. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.


Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Derex 19:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Psychiatry was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --Benon 13:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Battle of Normandy was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Battle of Normandy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --RobertGtalk 14:23, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Amber, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Friendly Neighbour 16:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Cold War on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Budgiekiller 17:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saddam Hussein

Thank you for your contributions to this article, but in the future, please cite your sources. The assertion you made has been reverted for the moment, but if you can cite a source, please go to the discussion page to suggest re-editing the article. Fascistkokomo 15:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ Arjun 17:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]



March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Bambara. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Leafyplant 16:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Bambara has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 15:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Anlo Ewe constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Qxz 15:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Anlo Ewe. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing – Qxz 15:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Anlo Ewe. – Qxz 15:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Eostre, you will be blocked from editing. Leafyplant 17:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Eostre, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 17:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Eostre, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 17:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for vandalism of Wikipedia

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for an extended period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Voodoo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 18:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 3 days as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. WjBscribe 18:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

WjBscribe 16:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Vandalism to Persian Empire

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Persian Empire, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your changes have been automatically reverted by CounterVandalismBot. If this is a mistake, please report it. Thank you. CounterVandalismBot 17:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Persian Empire. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Persian Empire was changed by 198.108.222.3 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-10-12T16:49:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 16:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Persian Empire, you will be blocked from editing. CIreland 16:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Political history of medieval Karnataka. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Triwbe 15:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:Monkey. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. – Gurch 19:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Weaving, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Weaving was changed by 198.108.222.3 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-08T17:23:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 17:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3 weeks from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Nihiltres(t.l) 19:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you wish to contribute to this encyclopedia, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), editing by anonymous users from your school, library or institution's IP address may be currently disabled. You continue to have full access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address is probably also disabled.

If accounts need to be created at school for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken.

Thank you.

Template:Do not delete

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Noh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Learning disability, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Learning disability was changed by 198.108.222.3 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-12-13T19:09:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Slime mold. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 19:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Slime mold, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 19:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gitlow v. New York. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. {{{2}}} --Oxymoron83 13:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hurricane Rita has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Addshore (talk) 18:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2008 Super Tuesday tornado outbreak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 18:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Henry Hudson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας discussion 15:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Twentieth century theatre do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bexample\.com' .
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.


Your recent edit to Leopold I, Holy Roman Emperor (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Leopold I, Holy Roman Emperor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Leopold I, Holy Roman Emperor was changed by 198.108.222.3 (u) (t) deleting 22021 characters on 2008-04-09T20:15:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]