User talk:Hind ji

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hind ji, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Hind ji! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


December 2020

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iglas. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change "town" to "city" in settlement articles that have population below 100,000. Indian government considers urban areas below 1 lakh as 'towns'. Check this link and this Wikipedia link. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand, thanks for this Hind ji (talk) 09:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, can you provide a different version that links to the exact page? This one is unviewable. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I try to find Hind ji (talk) 15:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Please do. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Sansi people. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Template:Z175 Ahmetlii (talk) 15:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts remove

Controversial topic area alert

Alert was not substituted as required. Reissued below. — Newslinger talk 23:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. —  Vengeance 01 (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z33

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 23:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z33

List of Jat states and clans

How long have the rulers been states or clans themselves rather than being rulers of? If they are not then they are not relevant and should be removed. noq (talk) 13:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reference & source is correct information. Please check source and references Hind ji (talk) 03:28, 16 May 2021 (UT If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soomra dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sindhi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keken clan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keken clan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keken clan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 13:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021: "Fixed typo" is not a catch-all edit summary

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
P.S.: be sure to cite a source for your content edits.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sirHind ji (talk) 00:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to use this -- Hind ji (talk) 00:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Punjabi Jatt

A tag has been placed on Punjabi Jatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ToThAc (talk) 05:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gisara
added a link pointing to Mustard
Kumai (village)
added a link pointing to Nai
Sidhu
added a link pointing to Bhatti
Smriti Irani
added a link pointing to Aatish

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021: Please refrain from copy-pasting others' applications for yourself

Information icon Hello there, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm here to leave you a reminder that copy-pasting (known as plagiarism) is widely frowned upon among the Wikipedia community. Recently, you have created requests for Autopatrolled, File mover and Rollback permissions, all of which comprise identical wording to certain applications above yours. Please remember that these applications are for you to explain why you would be suited for the role in question, and copying someone else's request for yourself means nothing to administrators who grant these permissions.

Since you seem to be fairly new to Wikipedia, all is forgiven; however, please remember that further attempts at this may result in more severe implications to your ability to create applications. If you believe I made a mistake, do not hesitate to contact me at my talk page. Thanks. Liamyangll (talk) 08:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't have any bad intentions. I just want to give my good contribution to English Wikipedia. Hind ji (talk) 19:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's alright, I'm merely here to just let you know of the expected conduct here at Wikipedia. I am not implying that you did anything wrong, so no need to worry too much. Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 02:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir, 

I am trying to do well, please keep guiding me.

Hind ji (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maestro Fresh Wes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You reverted good edits, and restored a version that contained a grammar error and a couple of things that go against the manual of style. bonadea contributions talk 11:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi Hind ji! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 17:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir I am trying to do well, keep guiding me. Hind ji (talk) 19:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Community sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33--RegentsPark (comment) 18:14, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir I am trying to do well, keep guiding me. Hind ji (talk) 19:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anjana Chaudhari. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 14:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Anangpal Tomar, you may be blocked from editing. The sources need to identify the subject concerned. As Anangpal is not mentioned in any of the provided sources, they are no use to support the claims. noq (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jat people. Chariotrider555 (talk) 20:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not Administrative, I'm also Extended Confirmation user, You are Extended Confirmation user. You are not Administrative. Hind ji (talk) 20:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hind ji, any user is allowed to warn any other user based on negative actions that they make to Wikipedia. It doesn't matter if the warning user is a new user, extended-confirmed or an administrator, and it doesn't matter if the warned user is new, extended or even an administrator. Everyone can do with some guidance. People seem to have noticed a considerable amount of disruption (whether intentional or non-intentional) from your edits, so it's important to read some of our policies and guidelines on content and conduct before editing. Thanks! Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 23:15, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Tomar Ancestry" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tomar Ancestry. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 8#Tomar Ancestry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. noq (talk) 14:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove the RFD notice from this article while it is still in progress. If it survives, the notice will be removed automatically. Removing the notice does not stop the process but stops people finding out about it that may be able to save it. noq (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Action

@SpacemanSpiff: Can you deal with this? This user Removes well sourced content from academic sources with false edit summary "the references dont support the claims". When they got reverted for the inappropriate edit, then they reverted the change to their own version without an edit summary using twinkle roll back.[1] and [2] whenever they were reverted again by user:Noq they roll backed with the false edit summary "restore sourced content" although they only removed what was sourced and  reverted it again without edit summary.

With so many recent poor redirect creations, they are also censoring RfD of their creation.[3] With talk page full of warnings and lack of indication of any improvement and further lack of communication by this editor, I think an indef block is best suited. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 06:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 06:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hind ji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, give me last chance. Hind ji (talk) 10:11, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hind ji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me sir Hind ji (talk) 13:52, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are on a path to losing access to this page unless you address the reason for the block and tell what contributions to this encyclopedia you wish to make. Your unblock request should be placed in the larger edit window only, not the smaller section header window, and you only need one request. 331dot (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Hind ji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, there will be no mistake in future.Do give me a chance. So that I can contribute well to Wikipedia

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Please unblock me, there will be no mistake in future.Do give me a chance. So that I can contribute well to Wikipedia |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Please unblock me, there will be no mistake in future.Do give me a chance. So that I can contribute well to Wikipedia |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Please unblock me, there will be no mistake in future.Do give me a chance. So that I can contribute well to Wikipedia |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

.

18:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

==

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Hind ji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, there will be no mistake in future.Do give me a chance. So that I can contribute well to Wikipedia

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please unblock me, there will be no mistake in future.Do give me a chance. So that I can contribute well to Wikipedia |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please unblock me, there will be no mistake in future.Do give me a chance. So that I can contribute well to Wikipedia |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please unblock me, there will be no mistake in future.Do give me a chance. So that I can contribute well to Wikipedia |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

==

Please unblock me, there will be no mistake in future.Do give me a chance. So that I can contribute well to Wikipedia}}. Hind ji (talk) 18:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hind_ji&oldid=1038464316"