User talk:WarKosign

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yapperbot (talk | contribs) at 16:31, 24 June 2021 (Feedback Request Service notification on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment (1/4 this month). You can unsubscribe at WP:FRS.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Older entries

Please comment on Talk:Paul Stamets

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Stamets. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Super Audio CD

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Super Audio CD. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:BMW M3

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW M3. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Dennis Bonnen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dennis Bonnen. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Map projection

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Map projection. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Windows 98

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Windows 98. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Lebanon War

Your last edit there actually restored the non-consensus version, since Mr Editor 2020 had already reverted his change. Based on your edit summary, I think you meant to restore to the version I had edited. Here come the Suns (talk) 22:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Here come the Suns: The article was stable before this edit you made. I did not restore a citation that was not edit warred over, I presume there was some reason to leave it out, but I can restore it too. I don't know which one of you is correct, please figure it out on the talk page and then if needed we can update the article. “WarKosign

” 07:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I must have misunderstood you, then. But you have the timeline wrong. The article was not 'stable' before my edit - Mr User200 added that quite recently, and as soon as I saw it, I reverted it. Per WP:BRD, he needs to seek consensus for that edit. If you check the article history, you'll see he has attempted to add this info into the article on multiple occasions, dating back to last year, only to be oppose by multiple users (Avaya1, Icewhiz, Tritomex and יניב הורון). If you want to start reverting, you need to participate in the discussion on the talk page, as well. Here come the Suns (talk) 02:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, it was added in these edits by Mr.User200 over 7 months ago and nobody disputed them, so I'd say this can be considered a stable version. It may not be the correct version, let's discuss it on the article's talk page. Please explain there why in your opinion these accidents should not be considered part of material losses. “WarKosign” 08:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, the Infobox edits (which is what you reverted) were added two weeks ago - [1]. Here come the Suns (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the revert WarKosign. Reverted to avoid being banned for the 1RR, like Admin Ed said even if i´m right i should not have reverted Here comes the Suns. I recomend to protect the article further. Current article its "Ok" and stable.Mr.User200 (talk) 11:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Mobile Launcher Platform

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mobile Launcher Platform. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mirror for a Hero original research

The source in the article time loop doesn't mention Mirror for a Hero. The sentence starts with "This story was a precedent to". Since the source you provide doesn't mention anything about Doubled and Redoubled being a precedent to Mirror for a Hero, what you're doing is original research or a misrepresentation of the source. ForgotMyAccountName (talk) 09:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ForgotMyAccountName: the source talks about Mirror for a Hero, and says "There the two men live one day, then wake up to relive the same events over and over again". This proves that film had time loop as a major plot point. Indeed the source does not mention Doubled and Redoubled, but why should it? The article is about time loop, this paragraph lists notable works employing this plot device. Doubled and Redoubled is an earlier example, Mirror for a Hero or Ground Hog day are later examples. Doubled and Redoubled is mentioned as a precedent, which means "an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide". Nobody says that Doubled and Redoubled inspired the other works, it is entirely possible that some of the later authors invented the concept on their own. “WarKosign” 09:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"but why should it?" because you put it in a sentence that says that Doubled and Redoubled served as a precedent to the film. ForgotMyAccountName (talk) 12:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ForgotMyAccountName: The word precedent did not mean that one work influenced the other, it only meant that it used the same plot device and came before it. I removed the word in the last version of the article, seems like you haven't even looked at it before reverting. What about groundhog day? Are you sure that its source mentions Doubled and Redoubled ? Let's remove Groundhog Day as well. “WarKosign” 16:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the source specifically says that Doubled and Redoubled is the precedent to 12:01 and Groundhog Day. On Wikipedia, you can't synthesize information (as a policy) and you can't add popular culture examples without a source describing their significance (as the current consensus). ForgotMyAccountName (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Medical ultrasound on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2021 Israel–Palestine crisis

Kindly stop violating WP:NOTFORUM at Talk:2021 Israel–Palestine crisis, the talk page of an encyclopedia article is not the place for your unsourced opinions not related to the article content. If you insist on sharing your feelings on that page I may ask that you be restricted from doing so. Thank you. nableezy - 01:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nableezy: Yes, thank you for reminding me; I will make an effort to avoid foruming. I wonder, however, why didn't you give the same warning to Nishidani. They forumed about as much as I did in that thread and keeps at it. It couldn't possibly be because you agree with their opinions, can it? “WarKosign” 15:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly because a. that section was derailed because of your comment, and b. youve done it repeatedly across a number of sections. So no, not because of that. nableezy - 21:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Israel

Template:Largest cities of Israel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Snake oil on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WarKosign&oldid=1030220218"