Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dacian words: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
create
 
Alex '05 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[List of Dacian words]]===
===[[List of Dacian words]]===
Hmm... Well I fear that there will be a lot of opposition, as this is a frequently edited article, but it had to be said sometime: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This is just a list of words and their translations into English. In fact, I think it's even a bad title, as it's really like, as RickK suggested, a "List of possible Dacian cognates to words in the Romanian language" or something like that. In any case, the editors work need not be lost, they shouldjust spend their time '''transwiki'''ing the article to wiktionary, so that it can be '''deleted'''. --[[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]] 07:10, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Hmm... Well I fear that there will be a lot of opposition, as this is a frequently edited article, but it had to be said sometime: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This is just a list of words and their translations into English. In fact, I think it's even a bad title, as it's really like, as RickK suggested, a "List of possible Dacian cognates to words in the Romanian language" or something like that. In any case, the editors work need not be lost, they shouldjust spend their time '''transwiki'''ing the article to wiktionary, so that it can be '''deleted'''. --[[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]] 07:10, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

'''Keep'''. Shorten the list, expand the text. It cannot be incorporated in the [[Dacian language]] article, because we can't just say 100% that all the words are Dacian. This article deals with words of substratum and probable substratum words in the [[Romanian language]], so it is an article on its own. The only problem is the long list, which can be shortened. [[User:Decius|Decius]] 07:21, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:21, 21 May 2005

Hmm... Well I fear that there will be a lot of opposition, as this is a frequently edited article, but it had to be said sometime: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This is just a list of words and their translations into English. In fact, I think it's even a bad title, as it's really like, as RickK suggested, a "List of possible Dacian cognates to words in the Romanian language" or something like that. In any case, the editors work need not be lost, they shouldjust spend their time transwikiing the article to wiktionary, so that it can be deleted. --Dmcdevit 07:10, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Shorten the list, expand the text. It cannot be incorporated in the Dacian language article, because we can't just say 100% that all the words are Dacian. This article deals with words of substratum and probable substratum words in the Romanian language, so it is an article on its own. The only problem is the long list, which can be shortened. Decius 07:21, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]