User:Arsenalcrazy8/Goal-line Technology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(94 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In the football (soccer) world, '''goal-line technology''' is a controversial magnetic tracking system of devices, which signals the referee when a ball has crossed the goal-line, thus indicating a goal has been scored. Usually in soccer, the use of any type of virtual replay or the use of a “freeze frame” for the referee is strictly prohibited, so goal-line technology has been an issue of advocacy.
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
|1. History
a. [[FIFA]] Explores With Testing
b. [[FIFA]] Stops Tests
c. Controversy
d. Urge to Continue
|2. Mechanics
a. Short Description
|3. Famous Advocators
|4. Reasons Against/For
|5. Sources
|}
Goal-line technology is a controversial device in the football (soccer) world, consisting of a microchip and sensor, which signals the referee when a ball has closed the goal-line, thus indicating a goal has been scored. Usually in soccer, the use of any type of virtual replay or the use of a “freeze frame” for the referee is strictly prohibited, so goal-line technology has been an issue of advocacy.


== Mechanics/Components ==
“Goal-line technology” consists of a few things.

1.) A microchip inside the soccer ball -

The microchip sends a signal to a computer that stores the information on where the ball is located on the field, and that redirects the message to the referee, so he can make a decision. According to Adidas, makers of the 'Intelligent ball', the microchip will not have any effect on the overall weight or flight of the ball.<ref>The Goal-Line Technology. (FIFA. December 13, 2007). <http://www.fifa.com/tournaments/archive/clubworldcup/japan2007/photogallery/gallery=659444.html#659402> October 15, 2008</ref>

2.) Referee’s signal unit -
The unit receives the message from the central computer and indicates when a goal has been scored. The unit is a watch that the referee wears around his wrist. Either a beep or a vibration alerts the referee that the ball has fully crossed the line, no matter what obstruction may lie in either the referee's, or the ball's way.

3.) Wired magnetic goal field -
Thin wired are put around the goal to create the magnetized field that the microchip in the ball reacts with to send signals to the main computer. Because of the "robust and stabilized" aspects of the ball and the wired magnetic field, the system is not affected by any weather changes throughout the match.<ref>Adidas and Cairos Test New Goal Line Technology During FIFA Club World Cup™ in Japan. (Adidas. December 13, 2007). <http://www.press.adidas.com/DesktopDefault.aspx/tabid-16/94_read-8534/>, October 18, 2008.</ref>


== History ==
== History ==


=== Controversy ===

Goal-line technology has been presented to [[FIFA]] because of certain instances that have caused the footballing world to look at a way to improve the quality of the game.


The first real call on goal-line technology came on January 4th, 2005:
The first real call on goal-line technology came on January 4th, 2005:
In a game in the [[Premier League|Barclay’s English Premiership]] between [[Tottenham Hotspur]] and [[Manchester United]], [[Pedro Mendes]] hit last minute 50-yard shot in an attempt to win the game. [[Roy Carroll]], the United goalkeeper fumbled the shot into his own net; the ball crossed the line by a clear foot. However, the goal was not given because neither the referee, nor the linesman saw the ball cross the line (BBC, match).


In a game in the [[Premier League|Barclay’s English Premiership]] between [[Tottenham Hotspur]] and [[Manchester United]], [[Pedro Mendes]] hit a last minute shot from the half-way line of the field in an attempt to win the game. [[Roy Carroll]], the United goalkeeper fumbled the shot into his own net; the ball crossed the line by a clear foot. However, the goal was not given because neither the referee, nor the linesman saw the ball cross the line. <ref>Manchester United 0-0 Tottenham. (BBC. January 4, 2005.)
Immediately the next day, the [[English Football Association]], responded by saying that it would “support any move for goal-line technology.”(BBC,FA.) The [[FA]] explained the difference between goal-line technology and video replay technology, insisting they would not support the latter, but would support the former.
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/4130167.stm>, October 15, 2008 </ref>
[[FIFA]] then responded by :

- Using a form of goal-line technology in the U-17 Peru championships.
On September 20, 2008, in a game between [[Reading FC]] and [[Watford FC]] in the [[Football League Championship|Coca-Cola English Championship]], The referee strangely decided to award a goal that went wide of the target. The shot, which really went out for a goal-kick, was called to be a goal by the linesman, who later claimed he thought he had seen the ball go in the net. This is the most recent incident that brought up the great debate on goal-line technology.<ref>Watford 2-2 Reading. (BBC. September 20, 2008.)
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_div_1/7614022.stm>, October 15, 2008. </ref> After the match, [[Watford FC]] manager, [[Adrian Boothroyd]], was absolutely furious, and he called for a change in the game of soccer with the introduction of goal-line technology.<ref>Solhekol Kaveh, Watford Manager Adrian Boothroyd Calls for Goal-line Technology. (Times. September 26, 2008.)
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/football_league/article4828422.ece>, October 15, 2008. </ref>


=== Development/FIFA's Stances ===

As controversial circumstances began to occur more and more frequently, many soccer federations, including [[FIFA]] were called to take stances on the possibility of introducing goal-line technology into the game; however, pressure from the public caused the responses to be delayed and for an organization to 'flip-flop' on the issue was not a strange occurance.

After the [[Tottenham Hotspur]] incident, the [[English Football Association]], responded by saying that it would “support any move for goal-line technology." <ref>FA Considers Goal-line Technology. (BBC. January 5, 2005).
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/4148155.stm>, October 15, 2008.</ref> The [[English Football Association|FA]] explained the difference between goal-line technology and video replay technology, insisting they would not support the latter, but would support the former.

[[FIFA]] then responded by <ref> Cary, Tom. New Trial For Goal-Line Technology. (Telegraph. November 23, 2006). <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/international/2350844/New-trial-for-goal-line-technology.html>, October 15, 2008.</ref> :

- Using a form of goal-line technology in the U-17 Peru Championships.

- Using another form of goal-line technology in “junior matches in 2007.”
- Using another form of goal-line technology in “junior matches in 2007.”
- Also using goal-line technology in the 2007 [[FIFA Club World Cup|World Club Championships]].(Cary,Telegraph)
The [[FA]] then, again, sported their stance on the use of goal-line technology; they once again declared their intention to fully support goal-line technology after an incident in a game between Middlesborough and Fulham of England, in which [[David Healy]] scored a goal that was not given, because, once again, the linesman, did not see the ball cross the line. (ESPN)
All of a sudden, on March 8, 2008, [[FIFA]] declared that they would no longer run tests on goal-line technology and the subject would be rejected “until further notice”(FIFA, goal-ice). In response to FIFA’s decision, many clubs around the world, along with a majority from the Premier League, voiced their concern at the outcome of no goal-line technology.
On September 20, 2008, in a game between [[Reading FC]] and [[Watford FC]] in the [[Football League Championship|Coca-Cola English Championship]], The referee strangely decided to award a goal that went wide of the target. The shot, which really went out for a goal-kick, was called to be a goal by the linesman, who later claimed he thought he had seen the ball go in the net. This incident has once again, brought up the great debate on goal-line technology.


- Also using goal-line technology in the 2007 [[FIFA Club World Cup|World Club Championships]].
== Mechanics ==
“Goal-line technology” consists of a few things. (FIFA goal-line)
- A microchip inside the soccer ball, which sends a signal to a computer that stores the information on where the ball is located on the field, and that redirects the message to the referee, so he can make a decision. (FIFA, goal-line)
- Referee’s watch, which receives the message from the central computer and indicates when a goal has been scored.
- Wired magnetic goal field – thin wires are put around the goal to create the magnetized field that the microchip in the ball reacts with to send signals to the main computer.




On March 8, 2008, however, [[FIFA]] declared that they would no longer run tests on goal-line technology and the subject would be rejected “until further notice.” Instead, they decided to add two more referees into the game, one behind each goal, to better read if a ball truly crosses the goal-line. <ref>Goal-Line Technology Put on Ice. (FIFA, March 8, 2008).
== Famous Advocators== (Warshaw, Telegraph)
<http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federation/bodies/media/newsid=707751.html>, October 15, 2008.</ref> In response to FIFA’s decision, many clubs around the world, along with a majority from the [[Premier League|English Premiership]], voiced their concern at the outcome of no goal-line technology. <ref name="Warshaw">Warshaw, Andrew. Clubs Dismiss Uefa and Fifa Goal-line Decision. (Daily Telegraph, 22 Mar 2008).
The following clubs/people are famous advocators on goal-line technology.
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/2295110/Clubs-dismiss-Uefa-and-Fifa-goal-line-decision.html>, October 15, 2008.</ref>

== Famous Advocators==

The following people are famous advocators either for or against goal-line technology.<ref name="Warshaw"/>

===For===

- [[Arsene Wenger]]/[[Arsenal FC]]
- [[Arsene Wenger]]/[[Arsenal FC]]

- [[David Gold]]/ [[Birmingham City FC]]
- [[David Gold]]/ [[Birmingham City FC]]

- [[Chris Evans]]/[[Bolton Wanderers FC]]
- [[John Williams]]/ [[Blackburn Rovers FC]]
- [[Chris Evans (footballer)| Chris Evans]]/[[Bolton Wanderers FC]]

- [[Chris Woods]]/ [[Chelsea FC]]
- John Wiliams/ [[Blackburn Rovers FC]]

- [[Chris Woods]]/ [[Everton FC]]

- [[Rafael Benitez]]/ [[Liverpool FC]]
- [[Rafael Benitez]]/ [[Liverpool FC]]

- [[Gareth Southgate]]/ [[Middlesbrough F.C.]]
- [[Gareth Southgate]]/ [[Middlesbrough F.C.]]

- [[Kevin Keegan]]/ [[Newcastle United FC]]
- [[Kevin Keegan]]/ [[Newcastle United FC]]

- [[Peter Storrie]]/ [[Portsmouth FC]]
- [[Peter Storrie]]/ [[Portsmouth FC]]

- [[Steve Bruce]]/ [[Wigan Athletic FC]]
- [[Steve Bruce]]/ [[Wigan Athletic FC]]

===Against===
- [[Sepp Blatter]]/ [[FIFA]]

- [[Michel Platini]]/ [[UEFA]]




== Reasons For/Against ==
== Reasons For/Against ==
The following have been mentioned to be the pros/cons of Goal-line Technology.
The following have been mentioned to be the pros/cons of goal-line technology.
- Con – the time it takes for the goal-line may take away from time from the actual game plays. (Aka slows down the game).
- Pro – It would make decisions accurate and eliminate the variable of human error.
- Con – The fear of glitches in the system could instead make decisions even more controversial. (aka computers are not perfect)
- Pro – The other team cannot complain on a decision because it is final.


===Pros===
- The introduction of goal-line technology would make decisions accurate and eliminate the variable of human error.


- Because a result is based on physics and has scientific evidence, the other team cannot complain on a decision.
== Sources ==


===Cons===
Espn. FIFA ‘Keen to explore’ Goal-line Technology. August 29, 2007.

<http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=454676&&cc=5901>
- The time it takes for the goal-line decision may take away from time from the actual game plays. The referee must wait for the message and this slows down the game.
Solhekol Kaveh, Watford Manager Adrian Boothroyd Calls for Goal-line technology. Times. September 26, 2008.
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/football_league/article4828422.ece>
- Computers are not perfect and the fear of glitches in the system could instead make decisions even more controversial.
FIFA, The Goal-Line Technology. FIFA, December 13, 2007.<http://www.fifa.com/tournaments/archive/clubworldcup/japan2007/photogallery/gallery=659444.html#659402>

FIFA. Goal-Line technology Put on Ice. FIFA, March 8, 2008.
- Soccer is a very old game played with almost exactly the same rules that it was invented with. The more change in soccer, the more the danger that the game will become warped, or something it is not.
<http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federation/bodies/media/newsid=707751.html>

Warshaw, Andrew. Clubs Dismiss Uefa and Fifa Goal-line Decision. 22 Mar 2008. Daily Telegraph.

<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/2295110/Clubs-dismiss-Uefa-and-Fifa-goal-line-decision.html>

BBC. Manchester United 0-0 Tottenham. January 4, 2005.
== Sources ==
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/4130167.stm
<references />
Cary, Tom. New Trial For Goal-Line Technology. November 23, 2006.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/international/2350844/New-trial-for-goal-line-technology.html
BBC. FA considers goal-line technology. January 5, 2005
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/4148155.stm
BBC. Watford 2-2 Reading. September 20, 2008.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_div_1/7614022.stm

Latest revision as of 19:00, 27 October 2008

In the football (soccer) world, goal-line technology is a controversial magnetic tracking system of devices, which signals the referee when a ball has crossed the goal-line, thus indicating a goal has been scored. Usually in soccer, the use of any type of virtual replay or the use of a “freeze frame” for the referee is strictly prohibited, so goal-line technology has been an issue of advocacy.

Mechanics/Components

[edit]

“Goal-line technology” consists of a few things.

1.) A microchip inside the soccer ball -

The microchip sends a signal to a computer that stores the information on where the ball is located on the field, and that redirects the message to the referee, so he can make a decision. According to Adidas, makers of the 'Intelligent ball', the microchip will not have any effect on the overall weight or flight of the ball.[1]

2.) Referee’s signal unit -

The unit receives the message from the central computer and indicates when a goal has been scored. The unit is a watch that the referee wears around his wrist. Either a beep or a vibration alerts the referee that the ball has fully crossed the line, no matter what obstruction may lie in either the referee's, or the ball's way.

3.) Wired magnetic goal field -

Thin wired are put around the goal to create the magnetized field that the microchip in the ball reacts with to send signals to the main computer. Because of the "robust and stabilized" aspects of the ball and the wired magnetic field, the system is not affected by any weather changes throughout the match.[2]

History

[edit]

Controversy

[edit]

Goal-line technology has been presented to FIFA because of certain instances that have caused the footballing world to look at a way to improve the quality of the game.

The first real call on goal-line technology came on January 4th, 2005:

In a game in the Barclay’s English Premiership between Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United, Pedro Mendes hit a last minute shot from the half-way line of the field in an attempt to win the game. Roy Carroll, the United goalkeeper fumbled the shot into his own net; the ball crossed the line by a clear foot. However, the goal was not given because neither the referee, nor the linesman saw the ball cross the line. [3]

On September 20, 2008, in a game between Reading FC and Watford FC in the Coca-Cola English Championship, The referee strangely decided to award a goal that went wide of the target. The shot, which really went out for a goal-kick, was called to be a goal by the linesman, who later claimed he thought he had seen the ball go in the net. This is the most recent incident that brought up the great debate on goal-line technology.[4] After the match, Watford FC manager, Adrian Boothroyd, was absolutely furious, and he called for a change in the game of soccer with the introduction of goal-line technology.[5]


Development/FIFA's Stances

[edit]

As controversial circumstances began to occur more and more frequently, many soccer federations, including FIFA were called to take stances on the possibility of introducing goal-line technology into the game; however, pressure from the public caused the responses to be delayed and for an organization to 'flip-flop' on the issue was not a strange occurance.

After the Tottenham Hotspur incident, the English Football Association, responded by saying that it would “support any move for goal-line technology." [6] The FA explained the difference between goal-line technology and video replay technology, insisting they would not support the latter, but would support the former.

FIFA then responded by [7] :

- Using a form of goal-line technology in the U-17 Peru Championships.

- Using another form of goal-line technology in “junior matches in 2007.”

- Also using goal-line technology in the 2007 World Club Championships.


On March 8, 2008, however, FIFA declared that they would no longer run tests on goal-line technology and the subject would be rejected “until further notice.” Instead, they decided to add two more referees into the game, one behind each goal, to better read if a ball truly crosses the goal-line. [8] In response to FIFA’s decision, many clubs around the world, along with a majority from the English Premiership, voiced their concern at the outcome of no goal-line technology. [9]

Famous Advocators

[edit]

The following people are famous advocators either for or against goal-line technology.[9]

For

[edit]

- Arsene Wenger/Arsenal FC

- David Gold/ Birmingham City FC

- Chris Evans/Bolton Wanderers FC

- John Wiliams/ Blackburn Rovers FC

- Chris Woods/ Everton FC

- Rafael Benitez/ Liverpool FC

- Gareth Southgate/ Middlesbrough F.C.

- Kevin Keegan/ Newcastle United FC

- Peter Storrie/ Portsmouth FC

- Steve Bruce/ Wigan Athletic FC

Against

[edit]

- Sepp Blatter/ FIFA

- Michel Platini/ UEFA


Reasons For/Against

[edit]

The following have been mentioned to be the pros/cons of goal-line technology.

Pros

[edit]

- The introduction of goal-line technology would make decisions accurate and eliminate the variable of human error.

- Because a result is based on physics and has scientific evidence, the other team cannot complain on a decision.

Cons

[edit]

- The time it takes for the goal-line decision may take away from time from the actual game plays. The referee must wait for the message and this slows down the game.

- Computers are not perfect and the fear of glitches in the system could instead make decisions even more controversial.

- Soccer is a very old game played with almost exactly the same rules that it was invented with. The more change in soccer, the more the danger that the game will become warped, or something it is not.


Sources

[edit]
  1. ^ The Goal-Line Technology. (FIFA. December 13, 2007). <http://www.fifa.com/tournaments/archive/clubworldcup/japan2007/photogallery/gallery=659444.html#659402> October 15, 2008
  2. ^ Adidas and Cairos Test New Goal Line Technology During FIFA Club World Cup™ in Japan. (Adidas. December 13, 2007). <http://www.press.adidas.com/DesktopDefault.aspx/tabid-16/94_read-8534/>, October 18, 2008.
  3. ^ Manchester United 0-0 Tottenham. (BBC. January 4, 2005.) <http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/4130167.stm>, October 15, 2008
  4. ^ Watford 2-2 Reading. (BBC. September 20, 2008.) <http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_div_1/7614022.stm>, October 15, 2008.
  5. ^ Solhekol Kaveh, Watford Manager Adrian Boothroyd Calls for Goal-line Technology. (Times. September 26, 2008.) <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/football_league/article4828422.ece>, October 15, 2008.
  6. ^ FA Considers Goal-line Technology. (BBC. January 5, 2005). <http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/4148155.stm>, October 15, 2008.
  7. ^ Cary, Tom. New Trial For Goal-Line Technology. (Telegraph. November 23, 2006). <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/international/2350844/New-trial-for-goal-line-technology.html>, October 15, 2008.
  8. ^ Goal-Line Technology Put on Ice. (FIFA, March 8, 2008). <http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federation/bodies/media/newsid=707751.html>, October 15, 2008.
  9. ^ a b Warshaw, Andrew. Clubs Dismiss Uefa and Fifa Goal-line Decision. (Daily Telegraph, 22 Mar 2008). <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/2295110/Clubs-dismiss-Uefa-and-Fifa-goal-line-decision.html>, October 15, 2008.