User talk:Faulknerck2: Difference between revisions

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mongolian death worm, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mongolian death worm was changed by Faulknerck2 (u) (t) deleting 11980 characters on 2010-06-16T21:59:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Bijjar.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bijjar.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 13:45, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Male Genital Mutilation (MGM)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Male Genital Mutilation (MGM). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Genital modification and mutilation. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Genital modification and mutilation – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Zad68 00:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Violence against men. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zad68 00:33, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Male Genital Mutilation (MGM). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Zad68 00:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

You have violated the Wikipedia Three Revert rule at Template:Violence against men

Hi Faulknerck2. You have now violated the Wikipedia three revert rule at Template:Violence against men. If you revert again I will report your edit-warring at the Edit-Warring noticeboard, and you will likely be blocked for it.

You do not have consensus for your edit at the page. You need to work with the other editors at the talk page to gain consensus. Zad68 00:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

You are now edit-warring at Genital modification and mutilation

You have now continued your edit warring at Genital modification and mutilation. You have now been told by several experienced editors that you must discuss your changes at the article talk pages instead of edit warring. Look, this is how it works: You make a change, it gets reverted, and then you discuss it and gain consensus before your change goes in. This is called WP:BRD. You do not keep adding your stuff back with out consensus. Doing what you are doing is called edit warring and it will get you blocked from editing. In a little while I will revert your change at Genital modification and mutilation. Discuss it on the talk page. If you put it back I will report it to the edit warring notice board. My patience is at an end, please start working collaboratively and stop edit warring. Zad68 01:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your edit at Genital modification and mutilation

Hi, I have reverted your edit at Genital modification and mutilation because the source you provided does not meet Wikipedia's standards for a reliable source. See the Talk page discussion about it here. I am assuming good faith and taking it that this is a 'new' edit not connected to your previous edit-warring. I trust that you will now discuss the edit at the article Talk page instead of reverting, because, given your history, if you start reverting this 'new' edit as you did the last one, we will be having a discussion about it at the edit warring noticeboard. Please discuss instead of edit-warring. Thank you. Zad68 04:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)