User talk:RichardWeiss/Archivehistory: Difference between revisions

Talk archives: Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6

Boddhi is the best always and forever

File:Shitcat.jpg

Shakti the shit cat

XgustaX don't edit this page! Ya basta con tu asi, SqueakBox 21:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Political Correctness

I wanted to let you know that I reverted your blanking of 2/3 of the Political Correctness article. While I agree there are improvements to be made to the article, I don't think that erasing most of it is moving in the right direction. -- MicahMN | μ 20:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

It was a simple mistake, I didn't mean to delete anything and was trying to fix it when you did. I have now restored my intended edit, SqueakBox 20:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about that. -- MicahMN | μ 20:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

The map

The map doesnt state who speaks second or first lanuage as there is only ONE offical lanauge in Brazil all it clearly says is that there is a large minority of Spanish Speakers in Brazil which is true and clearly states on the Spanish Lanuage page.

Users 66.146.157.211 and XGustX

Hello! Thanks for replacing that block message. It was placed on User talk:66.146.157.211 by User talk:XGustaX - I think this is a new user who was blocked too harshly, but was fortunately unblocked. Perhaps XGustaX thought that the IP caused him to be blocked? The block log is [1]. I've left some messages for the user here, but I think there is not much else to do too. --HappyCamper 18:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

sTOP[ HARRASSING ME NOW, XGustaX, SqueakBox 21:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Three-revert rule

You have been blocked for 24 hours for a violation of the three revert rule on Costa Rica. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Izehar 21:30, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

No i didn't. This is anunjust block. Proviide diffs, and not the mess XGustaX, who is still editing, provided. i contend |I did not break the rule, SqueakBox 21:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Either reply top me or, unless you can prove I reverted anything 4 times, I will place an rfc against you for abuse of admin powers, SqueakBox 21:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

This is wikipedia where admins who can't count block people. Please unblock me now, SqueakBox 21:40, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 - You reverted almost every edits XGustaX made! Anyway, I have blocked 24.60.161.63 for 24 hours (I'm assuming it's XGustaX evading his 24 hour block as he signed using the name "XGustaX"). I'll be watching this page if you want to tell me anything. Izehar 21:40, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

I never reverted to the sanm version 3 times. The others were compromises. THAT IS THE OPPOSITE OF 3RR. I deliberately avoided 3RR trying to make compromises and you have no right to block me for not doing 3RR, SqueakBox 21:47, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

I've unblocked everyone involved, and instead protected Costa Rica. I cannot work infinitely fast, so please, please, please everyone calm down and check back in a little bit when I have finished writing up everything. I will do this extremely thoroughly on Talk:Costa Rica. --HappyCamper 21:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Well I am still blocked but I agree that protecting the page was the right thing to do. As I have clearly stated I did not break the 3RR rule, nor did I tell XGustaX to shove everything up my mouth, etc, SqueakBox 21:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Nope - read Wikipedia:Revert:

A revert is to undo all changes made after a certain time in the past. The result will be that the page becomes identical to how it used to be at some previous time.

You certainly did that more than three times within the same 24 hour period. Also, according to Wikipedia:Three-revert rule:

Reverting doesn't only mean taking a previous version from history and editing that. It means undoing the actions of another editor, and may include edits that mostly undo a previous edit and also add something new, page moving, admin actions such as protection, etc. Use common sense.

You see - there is no requirement to revert to te same version - what you have to do is revert more than three times. Izehar 21:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

I'll go to the block list and see if I can unblock your IP. Izehar 21:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Try editing now - if you still can't, e-mail me your IP or list it here. Izehar 21:56, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes I am. You have a Happy New Year also. =) User:XGustaX