Pleistocene rewilding: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

8 October 2024

7 October 2024

26 July 2024

20 July 2024

1 July 2024

20 June 2024

30 March 2024

1 March 2024

27 December 2023

4 December 2023

22 November 2023

7 November 2023

25 October 2023

4 October 2023

27 September 2023

5 September 2023

15 August 2023

14 August 2023

12 July 2023

20 May 2023

12 May 2023

4 May 2023

3 May 2023

27 April 2023

17 April 2023

15 April 2023

14 April 2023

25 March 2023

27 February 2023

26 February 2023

16 January 2023

  • curprev 19:3319:33, 16 January 2023 PrimalMustelid talk contribs 53,460 bytes +39 Rereading the article, and this reads more like a shopping list for animals that have vaguely similar traits due to parallel or convergent evolution with not much sources listed in the process, especially the North America section. There is zero proof that African animals can be incorporated into North America without ecological consequences after 10,000 years of previous megafaunal extinction.
  • curprev 17:5917:59, 16 January 2023 PrimalMustelid talk contribs m 53,421 bytes −3 No edit summary
  • curprev 17:5117:51, 16 January 2023 PrimalMustelid talk contribs 53,424 bytes +54 Not nearly enough representation of criticisms against Pleistocene rewilding, largely operates on the overkill theory and assumes that large herbivores can immediately fill in previous empty niches without causing more faunal turnovers in the process similar to the Eocene and Miocene (also "When overkill is used as a cautionary tale and a means to rally support for environmentalism, it portrays humans as a destructive species." See: The overkill model and its impact on environmental research).
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)