Maccabean Revolt: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

14 September 2024

5 September 2024

  • curprev 17:4617:46, 5 September 2024 SnowFire talk contribs 77,395 bytes −60 rvt. the term existed at the time. more generally, historians use the term to describe the historical region. (maybe less so recently due to modern Palestine being more in the public eye? but it's used all over 20th century literature, including by Israeli historians like Bar-Kochva.) undo Tag: Manual revert
  • curprev 17:3517:35, 5 September 2024 Aristonkle talk contribs 77,455 bytes +30 The map was previously labeled as a topographical map of Palestine. At this time, prior to Roman conquest and the designation of the territory as Syria-Palestina, the term Palestine would be inappropriate for usage here. It has instead be renamed to reflect the highlighted portions of the map which include Judea, Samaria, and the Galilee undo Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 17:3217:32, 5 September 2024 Aristonkle talk contribs 77,425 bytes +30 The map was previously labeled as a topographical map of Palestine. At this time, prior to Roman conquest and the designation of the territory as Syria-Palestina, the term Palestine would be inappropriate for usage here. It has instead be renamed to reflect the highlighted portions of the map which include Judea, Samaria, and the Galilee. undo Tag: Reverted

10 August 2024

  • curprev 18:2818:28, 10 August 2024 SnowFire talk contribs 77,395 bytes −1,035 revert - this doesn't really fit with the text? This is the background section, why are we flashing forward to a historiographical overview of the whole revolt from a non-specialized source? The article favors books on nothing but the topic as it stands, not a side comment in a book on the Crusades. undo Tag: Manual revert

9 August 2024

26 July 2024

18 July 2024

5 July 2024

3 July 2024

16 June 2024

29 May 2024

13 April 2024

31 March 2024

3 March 2024

2 March 2024

1 March 2024

29 February 2024

22 February 2024

14 February 2024

23 January 2024

22 January 2024

18 January 2024

17 December 2023

14 December 2023

13 December 2023

11 December 2023

  • curprev 00:5600:56, 11 December 2023 SnowFire talk contribs 76,648 bytes −68 is that the auto-citer? That's just the same name twice in a row. It's not co-authors, just two ways to write Bar-Kochva. I thought Rajak's hypothesis was interesting enough to mention in the cite, but I'm not sure it's bulletproof enough for the article itself. undo

10 December 2023

8 December 2023

7 December 2023

6 December 2023

  • curprev 18:5618:56, 6 December 2023 SnowFire talk contribs 76,393 bytes +386 Undid revision 1188632827 by Lenius Previcus (talk) - uh, no? Read Honigman. She's controversial, but that's what she says. 1 Maccabees is very, very open about the enemy being "traitorous" Jews. See 1Macc 2:45-46: "And Mattathias and his friends went around and tore down the altars; they forcibly circumcised all the uncircumcised boys that they found within the borders of Israel." undo Tag: Undo
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)